Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-21-2012, 06:45 PM
 
4,428 posts, read 4,482,659 times
Reputation: 1356

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
Not really, but if it gets shot down, Obama did put any plans of a national healthcare on hold for 20+ years.

A national healthcare plan could be constitutional because the federal government would pay the bills, and not require the citizens to pay individually. No different than another welfare plan.
Yeah,

But the damn thing about that is that we just can't trust our Federal Government to process anything having to do with money properly.

Whatever they estimate the cost to be - you can expect it to double or triple.

But the plan will be passed based on their original figure.


Then look out. A decade or two out we're screwed.

How can we justify borrowing from China for our own Healthcare?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-21-2012, 06:50 PM
 
Location: Midwest
38,496 posts, read 25,820,712 times
Reputation: 10789
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yooperkat View Post
Yeah,

But the damn thing about that is that we just can't trust our Federal Government to process anything having to do with money properly.

Whatever they estimate the cost to be - you can expect it to double or triple.

But the plan will be passed based on their original figure.


Then look out. A decade or two out we're screwed.

How can we justify borrowing from China for our own Healthcare?
Interesting that other countries do quite well, in fact-even better, with a National Healthcare system. We are paying health insurance company CEOs billions to distribute our healthcare as they see fit. Why pay a middle man a huge profit that only increases our costs?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2012, 06:51 PM
 
4,428 posts, read 4,482,659 times
Reputation: 1356
Quote:
Originally Posted by jojajn View Post
Is this the system your are in support of?

Most Americans are in no mood to have the Government force them to buy health insurance. And it probably is unconstitutional.

If it is found constitutional, where will it end?



There has to be a better way. The Democrats just did it the wrong way.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2012, 06:54 PM
 
Location: Midwest
38,496 posts, read 25,820,712 times
Reputation: 10789
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yooperkat View Post
Most Americans are in no mood to have the Government force them to buy health insurance. And it probably is unconstitutional.

If it is found constitutional, where will it end?



There has to be a better way. The Democrats just did it the wrong way.
Then lets do it right and put everyone into one big risk pool........National Healthcare.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2012, 06:57 PM
 
4,428 posts, read 4,482,659 times
Reputation: 1356
Quote:
Originally Posted by jojajn View Post
Interesting that other countries do quite well, in fact-even better, with a National Healthcare system. We are paying health insurance company CEOs billions to distribute our healthcare as they see fit. Why pay a middle man a huge profit that only increases our costs?
We're not other countries.

Have you seen what our national debt is? Seen the deficits lately?



Insurance companies have a right to exist. (even for profit)

And insurance is sold as a buffer to soften the financial blow - for a health issue that may arise in the future. That's how it works and why it works.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2012, 06:59 PM
 
4,428 posts, read 4,482,659 times
Reputation: 1356
Quote:
Originally Posted by jojajn View Post
Then lets do it right and put everyone into one big risk pool........National Healthcare.
There are programs that already exist for most kinds of preventative care.

People just have to use them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2012, 07:00 PM
 
Location: Berwick, Penna.
16,216 posts, read 11,338,692 times
Reputation: 20828
Quote:
Originally Posted by jojajn View Post
This is nothing new. Also, these high risk pools have extremely expensive policies because everyone in these pools, are high risk. However, you are right. It is a start. Now we need to put healthy people in these pools to bring the cost down .............. National Healthcare!
The highlighted part of your post is the part that scares a lot of conservatives away; I don't see it as that simple, but if we are agreed as to the need for a stronger "safety net", I believe that local oversight is a better enhancement.

To hear the most extreme posters on boh sides tell it, the present system keeps staunch Republican grandparents alive to vote GOP at the age of 96, while potenetial Democratic loyalists miss critical tests or bleed to death in emergency rooms ... or you can turn the argument around the other way if you're of the opposite viewpoint.

But the fact remains .... medical care is already rationed de facto via the HMO system; how often you get a mammogram, a PSA or a colonoscopy is determined by your age and modified according to your personal and family health history. Beyond that, a personal pysician who knows you as an infividual is more adept at fine-tuning things than an insulated bureaucrat,

Finally, I believe that a larger component of the generation now entering retirement, and of those to follow, is able to discern the difference between common-sense heath care and unrealistic expectations of health preservation beyond our time. We as individuals have to determine, for ourselves, the point at whch a little bit more not-so-good time is not worth the effort.

But that is, literally, the last decision which I would want turned over to some anonymous functionary.

Last edited by 2nd trick op; 05-21-2012 at 07:20 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2012, 07:08 PM
 
Location: Midwest
38,496 posts, read 25,820,712 times
Reputation: 10789
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2nd trick op View Post
The highlighted part of your post is the part that scares a lot of conservatives away; I dot't see it as that simple, but if we are agreed as to the need for a stronger "safety net", I believe that local oversight is a better enhancement.
Insurance companies don't want the elderly. This led to Medicare. Insurance companies don't want the ill. They cherry pick, mostly through employment plans, those who are healthy enough to work. Insurance companies have the youngest and healthiest in their risk pool for huge profits while throwing the elderly and sick to the government to take care of. If one becomes seriously ill, they cannot work. Therefore, after their expensive 18 month COBRA policy runs out, they are out of insurance. They must then claim disability in order to collect Medicare. Insurance companies have it made and we healthy working people are all paying double as a result- our own insurance premium and tax to cover the elderly and sick.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2012, 10:25 PM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,643 posts, read 26,384,037 times
Reputation: 12648
Quote:
Originally Posted by jojajn View Post
Of course the public supports Obamacare!!! That is why it is politically wise for the Republicans to jump on board before an election.
I haven't heard Obama mention Obamacare. In fact, I haven't heard a Democrat mention it unless asked a question about it. Even then, all I've heard is promises we know are false. Given that it is the centerpiece accomplishment of this administration, I'm surprised. Aren't you?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2012, 10:37 PM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,643 posts, read 26,384,037 times
Reputation: 12648
Quote:
Originally Posted by jojajn View Post
I guarantee you that these popular provisions will not work without the mandate. The insurance companies will give the GOP their marching orders soon. The GOP will back pedal on supporting "1 part" of it. Perhaps the GOP should educated themselves as to why an individual mandate is necessary in order to cover preexisting conditions.


Good point jojajn....and liberals should read the Constitution to learn why the federal government cannot impose an individual mandate without amending the Constitution to give Congress authority to do so.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:56 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top