Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
What are you talking about? An executive order can be unconstitutional no less than any law can be unconstitutional.
So let me get this right. Your beef isn't that a law wasn't implemented by Congress but that law is unconstitutional? I don't get it. So what is it with the dictator talk?
I'm fine with them, as long as a legislative body such as Congress has substantial oversight. I don't trust one person being able to issue laws that affect the entirety of the population on their own accord. That one man can be running the country horribly - in 1969-1974 we had a TERRIBLE president.
So let me get this right. Your beef isn't that a law wasn't implemented by Congress but that law is unconstitutional? I don't get it. So what is it with the dictator talk?
Are you making the claim that Obama has not defied the Constitution? Because I'm aware he has. Even his own legal advisors and Office of General Council advised his actions were breaking the law. And he did it anyway. Congress didn't do anything about because the majority are as corrupt as he is.
Is this your definition of Constitutional? If the President does it and Congress lets him get away with it?
Congress didn't do anything about because the majority are as corrupt as he is.
Case in point: the national debt. Obama supporters cry "Bush started it! Bush started it!" when referring to how quickly the debt's been rocketing up since 2007. Actually, it was a Congress that was aligned with much of Obama's political ideology TWO YEARS before he ever set foot in the presidency.
I'm fine with them, as long as a legislative body such as Congress has substantial oversight. I don't trust one person being able to issue laws that affect the entirety of the population on their own accord. That one man can be running the country horribly - in 1969-1974 we had a TERRIBLE president.
Well there is plenty he does with no Legislative or Judicial oversight.
He claims he can kill a US citizen on his authority alone.
Are you making the claim that Obama has not defied the Constitution? Because I'm aware he has. Even his own legal advisors and Office of General Council advised his actions were breaking the law. And he did it anyway. Congress didn't do anything about because the majority are as corrupt as he is.
Is this your definition of Constitutional? If the President does it and Congress lets him get away with it?
The Libya debacle?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
