Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-12-2013, 03:29 PM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
10,581 posts, read 9,785,325 times
Reputation: 4174

Advertisements

As I mentioned, the President is supposed to use Executive Orders to implement something passed by Congress.


Recall that everything in the Constitution itself, HAS been passed by Congress (a 2/3 majority of each house, or better). Also ratified by 3/4 of the states, or better. That goes for the body of the Constitution itself, as well as every amendment it has so far.


Let's see. The 2nd amendment was passed by 2/3 of each house of Congress, and then ratified by 3/4 of the states. Just as the rest of the Bill of Rights was.


And the second said that for certain reasons, the people's right to own and carry guns can't be restricted or taken away.


Would there be anything illegal in the President issuing an Executive Order declaring that all Federal so-called "gun control" laws are hereby struck down and invalidated?

He would be doing nothing more than implementing what has already been passed by Congress. Isn't this exactly what Executive Orders are supposed to do?

What, exactly, would be illegal about the President issuing that particular Executive Order?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-12-2013, 05:01 PM
 
2,836 posts, read 3,496,479 times
Reputation: 1406
The Second Amendment proscription of "infringement" does not preclude "regulation". Thanks to the NRA and the Supreme Court, gun owners will soon find themselves the more "well regulated".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2013, 05:02 PM
 
Location: somewhere in the woods
16,880 posts, read 15,201,197 times
Reputation: 5240
but we the people who are armed shall never allow ourselves to be registered our confiscated. no matter what the dolts in dc think. all they will want to happen is to cause a war, one they shall lose.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2013, 05:06 PM
 
374 posts, read 236,228 times
Reputation: 46
Good.......maybe he can pass an EO to prevent Chuck E. Cheese from spitting in his pizza.

Maybe the little 4 year old missed his mark on Powerball and hit him in the balls with the ball.

You gonna have a little 4 year old gunned down by Secret Service because of that?

Of course you will/would.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2013, 05:10 PM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
10,581 posts, read 9,785,325 times
Reputation: 4174
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wendell Phillips View Post
The Second Amendment proscription of "infringement" does not preclude "regulation".
In fact, that's exactly what it precludes.

Why do you keep coming up with these bald lies, Herr Goebbels?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2013, 05:11 PM
 
374 posts, read 236,228 times
Reputation: 46
What did I mean by that? ^

He's a creep....he does everything backwards of what he should do.

He can cry his eyes on camera about kids.

Off camera...he's wasting them because he has to walk sideways for a few minutes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2013, 05:13 PM
 
374 posts, read 236,228 times
Reputation: 46
As I was saying......



Barack Obama Oath of Office - YouTube




He's a fraud!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2013, 05:14 PM
 
374 posts, read 236,228 times
Reputation: 46
Quote:
Originally Posted by Little-Acorn View Post
In fact, that's exactly what it precludes.

Why do you keep coming up with these bald lies, Herr Goebbels?
20,000 Firearm regulations on the books isn't enough....right?

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2013, 05:16 PM
 
Location: somewhere in the woods
16,880 posts, read 15,201,197 times
Reputation: 5240
Quote:
Originally Posted by VikingTactics45 View Post
As I was saying......



Barack Obama Oath of Office - YouTube




He's a fraud!


not many politicians actually support and defend the Constitution of the USA, really only the military takes that oath seriously, that is why they cant stand politicians.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2013, 05:23 PM
 
2,836 posts, read 3,496,479 times
Reputation: 1406
Quote:
Originally Posted by Little-Acorn View Post
In fact, that's exactly what it precludes.

Why do you keep coming up with these bald lies, Herr Goebbels?
Look at your own State of California: Can you buy any handgun you want?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:15 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top