Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 06-29-2012, 07:48 AM
 
14,292 posts, read 9,690,732 times
Reputation: 4254

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by florida.bob View Post
For three years now, Obama has been telling us that his health care mandate is not a tax. Obama's lawyers went to argue ObamaCare "was not a tax" before the SCOTUS, and now we are all supposed to celebrate because Obama says it is a tax?

Sept 2009 - "George... it's not a tax"

June 2012 - ObamaCare is a tax, and it's "a victory for people all over this country."

Last edited by OICU812; 06-29-2012 at 07:57 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-29-2012, 07:51 AM
 
Location: Hoboken
19,890 posts, read 18,771,243 times
Reputation: 3146
Quote:
Originally Posted by OICU812 View Post
For three years now, Obama has been telling us that his health care mandate is not a tax. Obama's lawyers went to argue ObamaCare "was not a tax" before the SCOTUS, and now we are all supposed to celebrate because Obama says it is a tax?
"George... it's not a tax"
Gasp!! You mean Obama is a liar??!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2012, 07:53 AM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,969,783 times
Reputation: 5661
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
The Supreme Court has ruled that Congress can now tax you for something you didn't buy.
I'll let Benjamin Franklin, Founding Father, American diplomat, statesman, and scientist address this:
Quote:
Letter to Robert Morris, December 25, 1783:

"All the property that is necessary to a Man, for the Conservation of the Individual and the Propagation of the Species, is his natural Right, which none can justly deprive him of: But all Property superfluous to such purposes is the Property of the Publick, who, by their Laws, have created it, and who may therefore by other laws dispose of it, whenever the Welfare of the Publick shall demand such Disposition. He that does not like civil Society on these Terms, let him retire and live among Savages. He can have no right to the benefits of Society, who will not pay his Club towards the Support of it."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2012, 07:58 AM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,969,783 times
Reputation: 5661
Quote:
Originally Posted by OICU812 View Post
For three years now, Obama has been telling us that his health care mandate is not a tax. Obama's lawyers went to argue ObamaCare "was not a tax" before the SCOTUS, and now we are all supposed to celebrate because Obama says it is a tax?
So? Obama didn't consider it a tax. Justice Roberts disagreed and his opinion matters more. The fact that Obama's signature legislation benefited does not make Obama's opinion a lie -- no matter how much you want it to.

But the end result is President Obama will not lose one vote he otherwise would have had because you think he's a liar.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2012, 07:58 AM
 
Location: Tampa Florida
22,229 posts, read 17,876,854 times
Reputation: 4585
Quote:
Originally Posted by shorebaby View Post
Gasp!! You mean Obama is a liar??!!

Err, Verrilli argued before the SC that if the penalty could not be justified via Interstate Commerce, it could be via Congress's Tax authority. But hey, don't let the facts get in your way.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2012, 08:03 AM
 
3,398 posts, read 5,110,342 times
Reputation: 2422
Quote:
Originally Posted by southbel View Post
As a realtor, you should know the implication on real estate gains though. That new 3.8% tax on gains.
Ya real neat.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2012, 08:04 AM
 
Location: Hoboken
19,890 posts, read 18,771,243 times
Reputation: 3146
Quote:
Originally Posted by florida.bob View Post
Err, Verrilli argued before the SC that if the penalty could not be justified via Interstate Commerce, it could be via Congress's Tax authority. But hey, don't let the facts get in your way.
Well thanks for supporting the notion Obama is a liar. He repeatedly claimed the mandate is not a tax yet HIS solicitor general argued it is!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2012, 08:05 AM
 
14,292 posts, read 9,690,732 times
Reputation: 4254
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrapperJohn View Post
No. Because its thousands of pages of government gibberish. It is one of the reasons I opposed it. They don't even know what's in it or the implications.

They signed it into law without reading it. They had to amend it the same day it signed because it did not cover children with preexisting conditions. It's an Obamanation of a law.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2012, 08:07 AM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,847,398 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by parfleche View Post
Wish I could ask obama. this is his theft I dont live in Romney's state
Why would you want to ask Obama about why Romney said what he did. You should be asking Romney. He is someone you support and believe in, no?

Quote:
Originally Posted by OICU812 View Post
Health care cannot be handled the same way as the stimulus and cap-and-trade bills. With those, the president stuck to the old style of lawmaking: He threw in every special favor imaginable, ground it up and crammed it through a partisan Democratic Congress.

Which is why ObamaCare should be repealed, its flat out - a bad law, passed in a dishonest, irresponsible, and corrupt manner.
And all the while making a point against Public Option and pushing for Mandate. Your comprehension issues continue.

Quote:
Originally Posted by southbel View Post
I don't think you would like the reform I would choose. Mine would be eliminate the mandate to treat everyone that walks through the ER. Also, no more employer provided health insurance for comprehensive plans; only thing eligible would be a catastrophic plan. Since there's no more comprehensive plans, you can get something like a supplemental (something like AFLAC) but it won't have that tax advantage of being offered pre-tax income. All cash payments for service and no more doctors checking with the insurance company and filing for you. You want money back? Get it from the insurance company yourself. No more insurance and doctor or hospital agreements on costs. This eliminates which doctors and/or hospitals cover you or not. Now, it's about covering you and not about an agreement with the hospitals and/or doctors. You have to shop doctors yourself to make a determination of cost.

Make it like car insurance, be able to buy across state lines. Tort reform that guts the ambulance chasing lawyers; make it near draconian.
I am sure that not only would I dislike your ideas, but also know that your ideas are utopian. So instead of deflecting, why not answer questions about two of the proposals you spoke of, that I hear often from the right wingers?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2012, 08:09 AM
 
14,292 posts, read 9,690,732 times
Reputation: 4254
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post
So? Obama didn't consider it a tax. Justice Roberts disagreed and his opinion matters more. The fact that Obama's signature legislation benefited does not make Obama's opinion a lie -- no matter how much you want it to.

But the end result is President Obama will not lose one vote he otherwise would have had because you think he's a liar.
Sorry, we all new it was a tax, the SCOTUS knew it was a tax, Obama's own lawyers kept slipping up and calling it a tax during oral arguments. Obama lied, by saying that is was not a tax. That's what a lie is, fool, it's claiming something is different from what it really is. Why else was the IRS involved in collecting it, if it was not a tax?!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top