Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,333 posts, read 54,445,037 times
Reputation: 40736
Advertisements
Quote:
Originally Posted by BucsLose
These long huge bills are disgusting. We all know they dont read them, they know they dont read them. They admit they dont read them yet vote yes for them anyways.
You know what happens when you get huge bills like that? You get crap that is as screwed up as our tax code.
Our government has become a complete sick joke.
Maybe those who write them should be required to explain them in detail, that might cut down the length.
Ridiculous. Laws are complicated. Senators don't have time for reading every word of a bill. Rand Paul just wants to stop the government from doing anything.
Ridiculous. Laws are complicated. Senators don't have time for reading every word of a bill. Rand Paul just wants to stop the government from doing anything.
Rand Paul is the a-hole who tried to hold up funding to make sure Federal flood insurance can payout on claims b/c he wanted the bill to include a personhood amendment.
And this has exactly what to do with a great idea??
Ridiculous. Laws are complicated. Senators don't have time for reading every word of a bill. Rand Paul just wants to stop the government from doing anything.
Is it acceptable to add a 300 page amendment to "The most profound piece of legislation to come to this floor in 100 years" at 3AM the day of the vote?
Rand Paul is the a-hole who tried to hold up funding to make sure Federal flood insurance can payout on claims b/c he wanted the bill to include a personhood amendment.
Nice deflection.
Now, shouldn't law makers actually READ bills before they vote on them?
I fully understand that the CBC won't, because of illiteracy, but everyone else should!
He's fighting the BAU. Good for him but there's no enough of his type in Congress.
Really sad that they have to pass a law requiring bills be read before they are passed.
I wonder if anyone will read his bill about reading bills .....
I betcha Pelosi won't ! She doesn't read them until after they are passed.
Ridiculous. Laws are complicated. Senators don't have time for reading every word of a bill. Rand Paul just wants to stop the government from doing anything.
You really expect people to want these clowns voting on bills that they have no clue as to what is in them?
You really want this kind of leadership?
And this has exactly what to do with a great idea??
Quote:
Originally Posted by alphamale
Nice deflection.
Now, shouldn't law makers actually READ bills before they vote on them?
I fully understand that the CBC won't, because of illiteracy, but everyone else should!
My point is that I don't trust anything coming out of this crackpot's mouth.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
