Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Except that it is Congress that is responsible for the deficit/debt, not the President. Presidents also have no control over the economy, although they can destroy one fast enough by opening their stupid mouths.
Presidents rise and fall based on the economy as it was during their tenure, regardless of how little direct control they have over it. That's the pickle Obama needs to be kicked in, not birther crap or photos of Muslim outer space.
Obama's spent his whole term blaming Bush for the economy, that ship sailed a long time ago, now it's time to blame Obama, what being good for the goose and all that.
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,330 posts, read 54,400,252 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dale Cooper
What on earth are you talking about? Presidents doing photo shoots for someone else's death? Of course not. Most people don't use pictures of themselves, period, old or new. Which, of course, is the point of the thread.
And just WHERE was the picture allegedly used? Have something like a government site actjually using it?
Yes, we real American's hate communism... You seem to embrace it...
I'm a real American. I don't hate communism. I see it as no threat at all. In fact, I think it's because I'm a real American that I know that communism is not a threat at all to this country. Now, fascism? That probably is a real threat.
Presidents rise and fall based on the economy as it was during their tenure, regardless of how little direct control they have over it.
I certainly agree with that statement.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wynternight
That's the pickle Obama needs to be kicked in, not birther crap or photos of Muslim outer space.
Obama's spent his whole term blaming Bush for the economy, that ship sailed a long time ago, now it's time to blame Obama, what being good for the goose and all that.
How about using a four month old stock photo and pretending as if it were recently taken, in order to underscore the duplicity, dishonesty, and lack of character this man has?
How about using a four month old stock photo and pretending as if it were recently taken, in order to underscore the duplicity, dishonesty, and lack of character this man has?
I'll admit the pic was tacky and focused in Obama rather then Neil Armstrong, but the insanity comes in with people trying to make a crescent moon and star out to be some kind of overt Muslim image. Come on, seriously?
It doesn't matter how old the photo is. Nobody says it was a new photo, or taken for this occasion. The point is he glorified himself when he shouldn't have.
Good God. I'm so glad life isn't that hard for me to figure out. I get so bloody sick and tired of people who can't think.
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,330 posts, read 54,400,252 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dale Cooper
/sigh.
Another explanation:
It doesn't matter how old the photo is. Nobody says it was a new photo, or taken for this occasion. The point is he glorified himself when he shouldn't have.
Good God. I'm so glad life isn't that hard for me to figure out.
WHERE did HE use this photo in anything to do with Neil Armstrong?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
