Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-16-2012, 08:55 PM
 
Location: South Dakota
2,608 posts, read 2,104,095 times
Reputation: 769

Advertisements

A BB gun could be defined as an "Assault weapon"

0bama says "cheap guns" are the problem in Chicago

How could anyone that owns a gun vote for this Jerk???
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-16-2012, 09:04 PM
 
Location: Central Ohio
10,834 posts, read 14,978,614 times
Reputation: 16604
The problem with Chicago is not its guns but sons of Obama.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-16-2012, 09:06 PM
 
Location: North of Canada, but not the Arctic
21,307 posts, read 19,935,250 times
Reputation: 25925
If they banned Democrats from owning guns, crime would greatly drop.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-16-2012, 09:08 PM
 
Location: Metro Detroit, Michigan
29,959 posts, read 25,085,073 times
Reputation: 28685
The problem is not with the guns... The problem is they are all too often in the wrong hands. Sure, let's do like Chicago, where the only folks with guns are the criminals, who probably wouldn't be allowed to own a gun in any city due to lengthy criminal records.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2012, 07:43 AM
 
687 posts, read 1,382,655 times
Reputation: 563
Air guns, because they use compressed air and not an explosive to expel a projectile, do not constitute firearms under Federal law. I find it amusing that people keep claiming Obama is trying to ban guns despite the total lack of any action over the past 4 years, while Romney actually signed into law an assault weapons ban when he was governor.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2012, 08:05 AM
 
Location: San Diego
990 posts, read 942,206 times
Reputation: 870
Quote:
Originally Posted by Earlyretired View Post
A BB gun could be defined as an "Assault weapon"

0bama says "cheap guns" are the problem in Chicago

How could anyone that owns a gun vote for this Jerk???
He supports the 2nd amendment

He said "cheap guns" because those are the kinds of LEGAL firearms which are being used in the inner-cities to murder people. Assault weapons and cheap handguns are not the same thing.

He's not going to take away your guns.

Gun voters are definitely the worst. They literally base everything on some tinfoil hat conspiracy that the government will send a militia to their house to steal their guns. It's completely insane and utterly moronic.

And Romney's position on guns has dramatically shifted just so he could get the NRA's endorsement. He was very anti-gun before and I think if he was elected that he'd be more willing to ban guns than Obama because he's actually done it before!

Here's an article showing how his position on gun control changes depending on who he is talking to.
Since you probably wont click the link, here's the highlight:
"I don’t line up with the NRA." — 1994, to reporters at a campaign stop. During his 1994 Senate campaign, Romney came out in support of the Brady Bill and a ban on certain types of assault weapons.


One-issue voters are bad enough, but the ignorant ones are even worse. Before you base your entire vote on something, shouldn't you make sure that you're actually right in your assessment of the one issue that matters to you?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2012, 08:09 AM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,906,464 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by Earlyretired View Post
A BB gun could be defined as an "Assault weapon"

0bama says "cheap guns" are the problem in Chicago

How could anyone that owns a gun vote for this Jerk???
I am going to. Because I would rather be a jerk to the idiots who are being themselves.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2012, 08:13 AM
 
Location: Area 51.5
13,887 posts, read 13,716,373 times
Reputation: 9177
Quote:
Originally Posted by nicet4 View Post
The problem with Chicago is not its guns but sons of Obama.
Yes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2012, 08:21 AM
 
Location: Old Bellevue, WA
18,782 posts, read 17,417,572 times
Reputation: 7990
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fundman View Post
Air guns, because they use compressed air and not an explosive to expel a projectile, do not constitute firearms under Federal law. I find it amusing that people keep claiming Obama is trying to ban guns despite the total lack of any action over the past 4 years, while Romney actually signed into law an assault weapons ban when he was governor.
Congrats, you are maybe the 100th person to post this meme on CD.

It's pretty simple if you weigh everything in context. Obama was on record as favoring a ban on all semi-autos (not just so-called "assault weapons") as IL state senator. He has never said that he changed his mind on that. He hasn't acted as president because he couldn't afford to politically. He told Sarah Brady that he was working "under the radar" on gun control. He remains committed to a generally collectivist outlook which spawned the idea that guns can be reserved to the collective (police & military).

Romney has a problematic past but has moved to the right, to individualism, on a whole range of issues, which to me makes his evolution on the gun issue credible. While Obama brought in Joe Biden, a leader on the pro-gun-control side, Romney brought in Ryan, a stalwart supporter of gun rights.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2012, 08:22 AM
 
Location: Londonderry, NH
41,458 posts, read 59,950,086 times
Reputation: 24865
I am an NRA member and after reading a couple of interesting article on GUNS in the latest issue of American Rifleman I threw it away as the rest of the magazine was a deliberately lying piece of pure propaganda. Everything they attributed to Romney was the exact opposite of what the man DID in Massachusetts when he was governor.

A vote for Romney is a vote to lose your rights to own ANY firearms. Plutocrats like Romney have a built in fear of armed peasants and to him anyone not born to money are peasants to be owned and exploited.

President Obama is a constitutional scholar and would not attempt to deny our right to keep firearms as protected by the 2nd amendment.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:08 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top