Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-18-2012, 11:51 AM
 
5,787 posts, read 4,718,922 times
Reputation: 853

Advertisements

It would have been cheaper to just give them money directly.....

Obama

Quote:
Sure enough, the “Seventh Quarterly Report” on the economic impact of the “stimulus,” released on Friday, July 1, provides further evidence that President Obama’s economic “stimulus” did very little, if anything, to stimulate the economy, and a whole lot to stimulate the debt.

The report was written by the White House’s Council of Economic Advisors, a group of three economists who were all handpicked by Obama, and it chronicles the alleged success of the “stimulus” in adding or saving jobs. The council reports that, using “mainstream estimates of economic multipliers for the effects of fiscal stimulus” (which it describes as a “natural way to estimate the effects of” the legislation), the “stimulus” has added or saved just under 2.4 million jobs — whether private or public — at a cost (to date) of $666 billion. That’s a cost to taxpayers of $278,000 per job.



In other words, the government could simply have cut a $100,000 check to everyone whose employment was allegedly made possible by the “stimulus,” and taxpayers would have come out $427 billion ahead.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-18-2012, 11:54 AM
 
Location: Pa
20,300 posts, read 22,231,983 times
Reputation: 6553
Obama is gambler. A bad one at that. To make matters worse he gambles with our money.
He talks about investing in the future. I would like to see where his personal investments are placed and what percentage is in green energy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2012, 11:58 AM
 
5,787 posts, read 4,718,922 times
Reputation: 853
I'm wondering what the Liberals here will say to dispute Obama's own economists????
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2012, 12:09 PM
 
5,787 posts, read 4,718,922 times
Reputation: 853
It kind of looks like Liberals want this thread to go away ASAP.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2012, 12:29 PM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
20,054 posts, read 18,293,964 times
Reputation: 3826
Bush's fault.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2012, 08:30 AM
 
5,787 posts, read 4,718,922 times
Reputation: 853
Looks like Liberals want to ignore this story of "success"?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2012, 12:38 PM
 
5,787 posts, read 4,718,922 times
Reputation: 853
Liberals =
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2012, 12:55 PM
 
12,265 posts, read 6,478,891 times
Reputation: 9440
The people who got those jobs were then able to spend money and create more jobs. Where has any manufacturing plant opened in this country without some sort of give away from the taxpayers. When the Saturn plant opened in Tennessee a few decades ago GM received about $250,000 in taxpayer freebies. When Comcast built it`s headquarters in Philadelphia the Pa. taxpayers had to ante up $30 million. Did you whine when KBR was awarded $80 million JUST IN BONUSES for work that electrocuted our soldiers in Iraq? I`m sure you were ok with that. A different administration ya know.
KBR Got Bonuses for Work that Killed Soldiers | The Nation
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2012, 12:56 PM
 
20,728 posts, read 19,377,191 times
Reputation: 8293
Quote:
Originally Posted by jt800 View Post
It kind of looks like Liberals want this thread to go away ASAP.
I am not a liberal but its using dollar accounting methods which in a macro economy are kind of BS to say the least. Why talk about pink unicorn nonsense?


A good libertarian can usually make the typical republican look like an idiot so its not good to be too cocky when prevailing against liberals whose heads are stuffed with fluff.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2012, 12:58 PM
 
5,787 posts, read 4,718,922 times
Reputation: 853
Quote:
Originally Posted by gwynedd1 View Post
I am not a liberal but its using dollar accounting methods which in a macro economy are kind of BS to say the least. Why talk about pink unicorn nonsense?
Sometimes the point of things fly right over some people's heads....

In other words, the government could simply have cut a $100,000 check to everyone whose employment was allegedly made possible by the “stimulus,” and taxpayers would have come out $427 billion ahead.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:20 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top