Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-31-2012, 12:35 PM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,640,534 times
Reputation: 14806

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by jt800 View Post
Ummmm....and the Joint Chiefs of Staff directly report to President Obama.
I think I'd rather believe the Joint Chiefs of Staff, than some hack writing an opinon piece in the paper.

Like I said, you look like a fool believing everything you find in the internet.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-31-2012, 12:52 PM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
10,581 posts, read 9,785,325 times
Reputation: 4174
Quote:
Originally Posted by jt800 View Post
Actually, that's not true.

An ILLEGAL direct order can be ignored.

Not that it applies in this case, but that's the facts of the matter when it comes to disobeying a direct order.
How can an order to simply stand down (if that's what it was) be illegal?

Keep in mind that every major deployed U.S. aircraft carrier (including the Stennis) carries nuclear weapons in a reinforced, secure hold, with only one door that is guarded 24/7 by Marines with live weapons. And of course has aircraft capable of carrying those nuclear weapons.

The idea of an admiral at sea who might disobey orders (especially an order to NOT fire), is not to be tolerated.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-31-2012, 12:56 PM
 
Location: The Woods
18,358 posts, read 26,499,682 times
Reputation: 11351
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
I think I'd rather believe the Joint Chiefs of Staff, than some hack writing an opinon piece in the paper.

Like I said, you look like a fool believing everything you find in the internet.
In a case like this, they're the last people I'd trust.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-31-2012, 01:15 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles County, CA
29,094 posts, read 26,013,345 times
Reputation: 6128
Quote:
Originally Posted by softblueyz View Post

The administration is committing suicide, giving ammo to be used against them at future hearings and possibly a trial.
Let's use it against them at the polls first.

Vote them out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-31-2012, 01:17 PM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,640,534 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by arctichomesteader View Post
In a case like this, they're the last people I'd trust.
Whatever gets you through the night bubba.

You can't trust the military, can't trust your neighbor, can't trust anyone but opinon pieces in the paper. Good luck with that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-31-2012, 03:45 PM
 
Location: Ohio
24,621 posts, read 19,170,143 times
Reputation: 21738
Quote:
Originally Posted by Little-Acorn View Post
I've been trying to find where the Stennis group was when the attack on our consulate in Libya occurred.
Why would you want to do that?

US 7th Fleet would be a giant humungous clue.

If you absolutely must know, Stennis was anchored just outside of San Diego on August 31, 2012. Do the math.

For the record, Stennis was in the 7th Fleet operational area on or about September 10. Now I wasn't in the navy, but I'm fairly certainly Rear Admiral Goucette would have assumed duties as Mid-East Strike Force commander at that time, especially since the Enterprise was cruising just south off the coast of Yemen (getting ready to enter the Red Sea) and had been officially relieved and is in-transit to return home to be decommissioned (December 1).

The point being Enterprise was no longer on combat status the minute she left the Persian Gulf.

Thanks to the marvels of modern technology, you don't have to actually be somewhere to command forces there -- you can be somewhere else.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Little-Acorn View Post
Keep in mind that every major deployed U.S. aircraft carrier (including the Stennis) carries nuclear weapons in a reinforced, secure hold, with only one door that is guarded 24/7 by Marines with live weapons. And of course has aircraft capable of carrying those nuclear weapons.
Nuclear weapons were removed from all US naval vessels in 1991 by order of President George H Bush.

That includes US carriers.

It would take about 3 days to hot ship a warhead from Yorktown Naval Weapons Station or from whatever that place is on the West Coast (I forget and I'm too tired to think) to any carrier or CGN.

Technically...

Mircea

Quote:
Originally Posted by jt800 View Post
Actually, that's not true.

An ILLEGAL direct order can be ignored.
Yes, but that is limited to certain special circumstances, usually the violation of an order, a law or a treaty, or an action that would be prejudicial and discredit the US or armed services.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Little-Acorn View Post
How can an order to simply stand down (if that's what it was) be illegal?
One of the few possible scenarios I can think of would involve a nuclear warhead.

Militarily...

Mircea
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-31-2012, 03:53 PM
 
Location: 44.9800° N, 93.2636° W
2,654 posts, read 5,762,576 times
Reputation: 888
Benghazi isnt going to swing the election. I mean, its fine to pretend that you're furious about this...but just an FYI, this isnt going to change anything.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-31-2012, 04:59 PM
 
Location: Wisconsin
37,972 posts, read 22,157,422 times
Reputation: 13803
Quote:
Originally Posted by jt800 View Post
Africom commanding officer U.S. General Carter Ham, who made the decision to assist diplomatic and intelligence assets on the ground, has been arrested and will likely be retired or worse, while those who ordered the removal of embassy security details and ordered U.S. forces to stand-down are left to go on about their business and likely risk more American lives in the future.

TRR: Is a General losing his job over Benghazi? - Washington Times

"Rogue" U.S. General Carter Ham Arrested for Activating Special Forces Teams; Ignoring Libya Stand-Down Order
A lot of coincidental general grade, military personnel shifts going on, and they all have Benghazi in common. Things are really starting to stink.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-31-2012, 05:31 PM
 
24,415 posts, read 23,070,474 times
Reputation: 15019
Fired for doing his job. No wonder rank and file troops can't stand Obama.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-31-2012, 06:10 PM
 
30,065 posts, read 18,670,668 times
Reputation: 20885
Quote:
Originally Posted by jt800 View Post
Africom commanding officer U.S. General Carter Ham, who made the decision to assist diplomatic and intelligence assets on the ground, has been arrested and will likely be retired or worse, while those who ordered the removal of embassy security details and ordered U.S. forces to stand-down are left to go on about their business and likely risk more American lives in the future.

TRR: Is a General losing his job over Benghazi? - Washington Times

"Rogue" U.S. General Carter Ham Arrested for Activating Special Forces Teams; Ignoring Libya Stand-Down Order
Free the general and put Obama in jail.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:53 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top