Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-18-2012, 01:34 PM
 
Location: In the heights
37,156 posts, read 39,430,503 times
Reputation: 21253

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by southward bound View Post
Let me get this straight. The left is saying that it's OK that democrats don't pay their taxes, and they use the excuse that there are some on the right aren't paying their taxes either. So, on the whole, it's OK all around.

Except for Joe the constituent, of course.
Who on the left is claiming this is fine? Also, those are back taxes distributed over a huge group of people all with possibly varying reasons that could be actually contested or what have you. It's still bad, but there isn't the kind of individual granularity or magnitude there was for someone who was running for POTUS. It's bad in all directions and partially why that bill doing audits of sort on government employees was put in place so there is recourse for the IRS to both publicize and go after anyone who is delinquent. It's akin to making it so everyone in federal employee gets an audit of sorts.

Quote:
Originally Posted by NCN View Post
Who pays these aides? If it is a government job they should be fired for having unpaid taxes.

I am wondering if there is a record of this somewhere. How do you discover that someone does not pay the IRS? If there is a record and this is public knowledge this needs to be brought before congress. Things like this need to be stopped and certainly a law put forth that would prevent them from getting any more of public money when they don't pay up themselves.
The aides are paid to do a job and might not necessarily be loyal to a party (like an IT guy working for a branch or some such is not necessarily going to be a member of the party). The reason why we know about this stuff was actually part of a bill that was passed purposely to actually do a government self-check by doing a sort of audit on all federal employees. Now let's get them backtaxes and get some real necessary work funded. M I RITE?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-18-2012, 02:56 PM
 
Location: Southern California
15,080 posts, read 20,479,858 times
Reputation: 10343
Quote:
Originally Posted by roysoldboy View Post
Although ABC brought up this part in January the media forgot to mention it ever again when Obama went after Romney for his returns. It is very interesting to see how other employees of the federal government owe so much. For instance, 413 people in the EPA owe over $19 million. That figures out to over $46K for each person, on the average.

You see this is why Democrats are so eager to raise taxes, they don’t pay them anyway!


36 Obama aides owe $833,970 in back taxes – media silent : Fire Andrea Mitchell!
What does this have to do with Obama himself? He's not responsible for their tax obligations.

[shrug]
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2012, 03:27 PM
 
Location: Dallas
31,292 posts, read 20,749,540 times
Reputation: 9330
Quote:
Originally Posted by MIKEETC View Post
What does this have to do with Obama himself? He's not responsible for their tax obligations.

[shrug]
But he is responsible for the type of person he requires his staff to hire. He could easily tell his staff to not hire anyone who is a tax cheat.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2012, 03:41 PM
 
Location: Redondo Beach, CA
7,835 posts, read 8,442,041 times
Reputation: 8564
Quote:
Originally Posted by theS5 View Post

Don't waste your keystrokes. It has been medically proven that Liberals have an area of the brain that is impenetrable to any form of logic, reason, common sense or anything anti-Obama.
Internal Revenue Manual - 5.19.18 Federal Employee/Retiree Delinquency Initiative (FERDI)
"The Federal Employee/Retiree Delinquency Initiative (FERDI) program was developed in 1993 to promote federal tax compliance among current and retired federal employees. The program incorporates the purpose and intent of Office of Government Ethics regulation 5 C.F.R.2635.809, which addresses the responsibility of federal employees to "satisfy in good faith their obligations as citizens, including all just financial obligations, especially those such as federal, state or local taxes that are imposed by law."
So these reports have been issued since the Clinton administration, inclusive of all 8 years of the Bush administration, and suddenly these delinquencies are Obama's fault, or the exclusive domain of people in the Obama administration?

Do you have any idea how utterly ridiculous that is?

So yeah, some of us have a real problem with the invention of fake outrages to pin on President Obama by people who are simply anti-Obama and not pro-facts or common sense.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2012, 03:54 PM
 
Location: Area 51.5
13,887 posts, read 13,676,249 times
Reputation: 9174
Only a complete moron would equate not paying taxes to not showing tax returns to the public.

No surprise there.

IQ: Pretty close to 0.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2012, 03:56 PM
 
27,149 posts, read 15,327,118 times
Reputation: 12074
Quote:
Originally Posted by OyCrumbler View Post
Who on the left is claiming this is fine? Also, those are back taxes distributed over a huge group of people all with possibly varying reasons that could be actually contested or what have you. It's still bad, but there isn't the kind of individual granularity or magnitude there was for someone who was running for POTUS. It's bad in all directions and partially why that bill doing audits of sort on government employees was put in place so there is recourse for the IRS to both publicize and go after anyone who is delinquent. It's akin to making it so everyone in federal employee gets an audit of sorts.



The aides are paid to do a job and might not necessarily be loyal to a party (like an IT guy working for a branch or some such is not necessarily going to be a member of the party). The reason why we know about this stuff was actually part of a bill that was passed purposely to actually do a government self-check by doing a sort of audit on all federal employees. Now let's get them backtaxes and get some real necessary work funded. M I RITE?


It's really not a huge group of people but the amount sure is significant for a group that small.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2012, 03:59 PM
 
Location: Southern California
15,080 posts, read 20,479,858 times
Reputation: 10343
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadking2003 View Post
But he is responsible for the type of person he requires his staff to hire. He could easily tell his staff to not hire anyone who is a tax cheat.
And they would know this how?

[]
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2012, 04:01 PM
 
Location: Dallas
31,292 posts, read 20,749,540 times
Reputation: 9330
Quote:
Originally Posted by MIKEETC View Post
And they would know this how?

[]

The IRS has computers with this info. Government, meet government. Duh!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2012, 04:04 PM
 
Location: Dallas
31,292 posts, read 20,749,540 times
Reputation: 9330
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jill61 View Post

So yeah, some of us have a real problem with the invention of fake outrages to pin on President Obama by people who are simply anti-Obama and not pro-facts or common sense.
And some of us have a real problem with people defending tax cheats just because it's not a new phenomena.

And some people are just pro Obama and not pro facts or common sense.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2012, 04:08 PM
Status: "119 N/A" (set 27 days ago)
 
12,964 posts, read 13,681,864 times
Reputation: 9695
Owing back taxes and being delinquent are not the same. They could be sending the IRS a monthly check as many people do. Many Jobs for the state and federal government require tax compliance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:38 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top