Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Romney and the (R)etards lost big . . . [brace yourselves, this gonna hurt a little] . . . because most of US think Romney and the (R)etards suck. You were measured and came up light.
Big Deal. Get over it.
But we are gracious.
You do not have to pack bags and your gay little upside down flags, and go pouting off to . . . so where is the (R)etards are pouting off to anyway . . .
You can still live here, and the rest of US will just snicker a little.
Either way you cut it, whether Paul captured votes etc. Romney, again, was the wrong candidate spewing the wrong format while being the hypocrite. I never encountered a candidate who banks most if not all his money in offshore accounts. A candidate so arrogant that when the people demanded to see his taxes in "detail" not some GD summary, that was it for him. Let him go eat cake.
Imagine an R party where they would have gary johnson, Hunstman, and romney having a debate ? That would have been interesting 3 different types of conservatives with 3 different ideas on how to run things. Also for the Democrate side imagine Obama debating Jill stein I wonder how much she would destroy him.
As long as the Republican Party identifies more with Santorum and Gingrich than Ron Paul, then they will continue to lose.
That's hardly believable. Paul never captured much interest from most voters.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.