Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-21-2012, 01:58 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,747,599 times
Reputation: 35920

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by TrapperJohn View Post
Link?
Here ya go!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qWJTUAezxAI
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-21-2012, 02:01 PM
 
Location: The Brat Stop
8,347 posts, read 7,240,412 times
Reputation: 2279
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katiana View Post
Clearly, the RW is very concerned about possible new controls on guns. It's funny to watch, really.
Are you kidding Kat? I thought they were after our cars?
I'm going to go hide mine in a snow bank somewhere they won't be able to find it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-21-2012, 02:04 PM
 
Location: Whoville....
25,386 posts, read 35,537,397 times
Reputation: 14692
Quote:
Originally Posted by chielgirl View Post
Are you saying that the objective of a car is to kill?
That's the sole reason for guns, they're killing machines.

Another idiot thread.
So are cars. The day my father handed me the keys to the car for the first time, he told me to remember that 2000 pounds of metal is a lethal weapon and he was right.

And the purpose of guns is protection or hunting for food. BTW, I am not a gun fan but I know that the pupose is to protect or hunt. Yes, you can kill with a gun but you can kill with a car too. I could plow my car through the front window of a restaurant and take out a few people.

You can just as easily say "Cars don't kill, people kill" as you can "Guns don't kill, people kill". If we had outlawed cars at the beginning of the year, how many people would be alive today?

Life involves risk.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-21-2012, 02:53 PM
 
10,553 posts, read 9,649,020 times
Reputation: 4784
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ivorytickler View Post
So are cars. The day my father handed me the keys to the car for the first time, he told me to remember that 2000 pounds of metal is a lethal weapon and he was right.

And the purpose of guns is protection or hunting for food. BTW, I am not a gun fan but I know that the pupose is to protect or hunt. Yes, you can kill with a gun but you can kill with a car too. I could plow my car through the front window of a restaurant and take out a few people.

You can just as easily say "Cars don't kill, people kill" as you can "Guns don't kill, people kill". If we had outlawed cars at the beginning of the year, how many people would be alive today?

Life involves risk.
Cars are not designed for the sole purpose of killing. Guns are.

Besides "in the United States, only motor vehicle crashes and cancer claim more lives among children 5–14 years old than do firearms."

http://www.policyarchive.org/handle/...eams/96411.pdf
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-21-2012, 03:03 PM
 
3,614 posts, read 3,502,493 times
Reputation: 911
Quote:
Originally Posted by ellemint View Post
Cars are not designed for the sole purpose of killing. Guns are.

Besides "in the United States, only motor vehicle crashes and cancer claim more lives among children 5–14 years old than do firearms."

http://www.policyarchive.org/handle/...eams/96411.pdf
What would those rates be?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-21-2012, 03:11 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,747,599 times
Reputation: 35920
Quote:
Originally Posted by Konraden View Post
What would those rates be?
They've been posted before (by me, for one). Do a search.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-21-2012, 03:11 PM
 
10,553 posts, read 9,649,020 times
Reputation: 4784
Quote:
Originally Posted by Konraden View Post
What would those rates be?

http://www.cdc.gov/safechild/images/...hoodinjury.pdf

"Overall, before a child in the United States reaches 15 years of age, he or she is 5 times more likely than a child in the rest of the industrialized world to be murdered, 2 times as likely to commit suicide and 12 times more likely to die a firearm-related death."

http://www.policyarchive.org/handle/...eams/96411.pdf
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-21-2012, 03:37 PM
 
Location: Pacific NW
9,437 posts, read 7,368,395 times
Reputation: 7979
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayland Woman View Post
Guns are manufactured and sold with one purpose in mind: to kill. Cars are manufactured and sold with one purpose in mind: to get people from point A to point B. If you can't understand the difference then you're not smart enough to be trusted owning a gun. Maybe an IQ test should be required to own a gun if the OP's logic is typical of gun owners.
Another lib with absolutely no idea what you're talking about. You're clearly beyond help.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TriMT7 View Post
My car is not a weapon.

Though, like anything really, it CAN be a weapon.


However, since the ownership of my car is regulated on so many fronts - from licensure, to registration, to banning certain types of vehicles, to inspection in many states - perhaps the OP can get behind more regulation?

After all, the 2nd Amendment protects a WELL REGULATED militia. Not grown man-children who play with guns to make them feel like men.

And another who doesn't know what they're talking about, either in regards to cars or guns. Ownership of a car isn't regulated at all. Anyone with cash can go and buy one and drive it all they want on private property without any licensing, insurance or registration.

You would think if someone were going to try and quote the 2nd amendment they might have some clue what it actually says, but as usual the gun banners get it wrong. Do you know what an independent clause is? You should have learned it in grade school.

"the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

That should be clear enough for anyone.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-21-2012, 03:46 PM
 
Location: Pacific NW
9,437 posts, read 7,368,395 times
Reputation: 7979
Quote:
Originally Posted by EdwardA View Post
The main purpose of cars are to transport people over distances in a short period of time. The only purpose of the Bushmaster rifle to kill as many people as possible. Is that the goal of society?
And yet cars still kill more people than guns.

More wet dreams from a gun grabber, all you can think about is killing. The only purpose of a Bushmaster is to fire a projectile - period no more no less. What people use it for is something else, the VAST majority of them are used for fun target shooting.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-21-2012, 03:48 PM
 
Location: Pacific NW
9,437 posts, read 7,368,395 times
Reputation: 7979
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deezus View Post
No one really wants to ban all guns either. People are just discussing the possibility of more regulations--just as we have regulations for cars, such as driving tests, DUI laws, speed limits, manufactuer safety regulations, seat-belts, stop lights and so on...
That is a complete bald face lie. Every single thread about guns here has at least one person calling for a complete ban on guns.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top