Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
"-From a man who thought it reasonable to keep and trade slaves and allow only white men who owned land free and clear the right to vote."
Certainly sounds like this is what you are saying.
he quotes the part that has been interprated as being an individual right. Not all agree.
I am aware that SCOTUS has recently affirmed the invididual right. Many of us think those cases were wrongly decided (and I think this quote, altogether, provides support to the notion that Madison thought of it largely as a collective right) However what SCOTUS has said is the law - and so neither congress nor the states may ban all guns, or may ban handguns altogether, etc. As per the recent cases. However I do not expect that SCOTUS will overturn any of the forms of gun control that are being discussed seriously now at a national level.
I believe this to be irony. You don't agree with SCOTUS in this case (which is fine), but I'm willing to bet there isn't a conservative out there who would call this decision "activist" like they've called most "left-leaning" decisions over the past eighty years. Roe v. Wade? Activist! Heller v. DC? Doing their Job!
Well in the liberal world "real danger of public injury from individuals" means "disarm everyone."
No. Just in the paranoid delusions of a far right winger.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.