Christie Unloads On The Far Right Again, This Time The NRA (unemployment, Kerry)

[SourD]

Originally Posted by cecilsav

Obama had kids on stage who responded to a national tragedy. They showed some initiative and maturity. Was the NRA's message positive about kids?

You know who else used children for in their propaganda? Stalin, Hitler and just about every other power hungry dictator.

[Fox Terrier]

Originally Posted by SourD

You know who else used children for in their propaganda? Stalin, Hitler and just about every other power hungry dictator.

And the word 'Mao' can be made from the letters of Obama's name.

Now, THERE'S a real conspiracy!
It's the New World Order!
How much would you bet that the next president's name will contain the letters to make the word 'Castro'?

We're getting clooooossssseeeeerrrrr!

>>>>><<<<<

[LordBalfor]

Originally Posted by SourD

You know who else used children for in their propaganda? Stalin, Hitler and just about every other power hungry dictator.

You forgot the mention the first George Bush:

George H. W. Bush Address to Jr. High School Students - C-SPAN Video Library

And Ronald Reagan:


TRMS: 1988 President Ronald Reagan's "NEGRO" remarks to Junior High School students (09 08 2009) - YouTube

Ken

[EinsteinsGhost]

Originally Posted by RebelYell14

Christie is an idiot. Obama started this by trying to trash our constitution. Hell with him. He took the gloves off its game on.

Regulating armed people is not trashing the constitution, it is respecting it.

[jwm1964]

Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost

Regulating armed people is not trashing the constitution, it is respecting it.

Please explain your logic . . .

[EinsteinsGhost]

Originally Posted by jwm1964

Please explain your logic . . .

Second Amendment:
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

Not Second Amendment:
"Congress shall make no law against the right to keep and bear arms"

[jwm1964]

Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost

Second Amendment:
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

Not Second Amendment:
"Congress shall make no law against the right to keep and bear arms"

I'm not sure where that coincides with Federal legislation - doesn't it specify the state?

[LordBalfor]

Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost

Second Amendment:
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

Not Second Amendment:
"Congress shall make no law against the right to keep and bear arms"

Yeah, funny how the gun nuts always ignore the "well regulated militia" part of the Amendment.

Ken

[EinsteinsGhost]

Originally Posted by jwm1964

I'm not sure where that coincides with Federal legislation - doesn't it specify the state?

States' role is rather limited when it comes to the militia. And regardless of the roles defined for active militia (they don't need second amendment), states should take upon the responsibility to regulate sensibly rather than preach deregulation in which case, federal intervention is not unwarranted. This applies to EVERY thing. Articles of Confederation was killed in 1789.

[LauraC]

Guess he doesn't ever want to be President.