Should we ban people? (extremist, racist, ideologies, parties)

[Harrier]

Originally Posted by iNviNciBL3

I don't know one Democrat/liberal that wants to ban guns.

Dianne Feinstein isn't a Democrat?

Assault Weapons - Issues - United States Senator Dianne Feinstein

Bans...firearms

[Mac_Muz]

Originally Posted by Seekingcreativity

I am SO on board with that!! Just keep a select few with great genes to procreate. The world will be at peace for all eternity

Until food making industrial machines break down

[Harrier]

Originally Posted by Don Draper

LMFAO, you want to control what women can do with their bodies?

No.

I support the right of women to choose to put drugs into their body.

[iNviNciBL3]

Originally Posted by Harrier

Dianne Feinstein isn't a Democrat?

Assault Weapons - Issues - United States Senator Dianne Feinstein

She wants to ban all guns?

I'm talking about completely banning all guns and abolishing the 2nd amendment, people keep crying "wah they are going to abolish the 2nd amendment and take my gun!"

[Seekingcreativity]

Originally Posted by Mac_Muz

Until food making industrial machines break down

We can handle all of that and then some

[Harrier]

Originally Posted by iNviNciBL3

She wants to ban all guns?

I'm talking about completely banning all guns and abolishing the 2nd amendment, people keep crying "wah they are going to abolish the 2nd amendment and take my gun!"

A well regulated militia, neccesary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

- 2nd Amendment to the United States Constitution

What part of "shall not be infringed" do you not understand?

[RaymondChandlerLives]

Guns don't kill people, bullets do.

[Harrier]

I find it interesting that the same people who complain that guns kill people seem to support those who wish to destroy human life in the womb.

If guns kill people than so do abortion doctors.

[Iamme73]

Originally Posted by Harrier

The core of conservatism is liberty.

You need to turn off Rachel Maddow.

While ideas corresponding to internal homogenization and nativism are to be found in all far-right groups, thereby constituting a minimal definition of far-right ideology, there are other ideological elements which are considered almost consensual, and are present in the majority of far-right groups or parties, although not in all of them, and not always as core principles. These can be divided into two groups. The first includes concepts that complement the rationale of internal homogenization through xenophobia, racism and exclusionism. Xenophobia involves behaviors and sentiments derived from fear, hate and hostility towards groups which are perceived as alien or strange, including people with alternative sexual preferences, styles of living and behavior;29 racism refers to the same sentiments, but based on racial grounds, such as belief in the national and moral significance of natural and hereditary differences between races, and the conviction that certain races are superior to others.

This part of the report from the west point paper on violent right wing groups. Those groups share many of the same core beliefs of far right wing conservatives. This isn't the only paper about right wing groups that defines it as nationalistic, intolerant, exclusionary, racist, and violent.

I know, I know West Point is a bastion of liberalism that's why the study was produce that's why the study of violent or conservative groups reveal the core ugly beliefs.

[jjrose]

Originally Posted by Harrier

I am a conservative with certain libertarian stances.

You keep on telling yourself that.