Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
So what about teenagers? Although it's nice in theory, in practicality it doesn't work so well. Today you need more education and experience before you can afford a kid when compared to 100 years ago. Without abortion we will need public funding one way or another.
What about teenagers? Teenagers should not be having sex. No one should until they are mature enough to shoulder the responsibilities - and that is best done within the framework of marriage.
Why can't young people enjoy their youth while they have it - and leave adult things like sexual intercourse for later once they find a lifelong mate?
Once again - where did I ever mention religion - let alone a church?
The second you mentioned being against abortion I knew you were a Bible banger. I'm surprised. Are you an atheist? If you are, you'll have no problem saying that God is dead. Say it. I'll put money on it you won't.
What about teenagers? Teenagers should not be having sex. No one should until they are mature enough to shoulder the responsibilities - and that is best done within the framework of marriage.
Why can't young people enjoy their youth while they have it - and leave adult things like sexual intercourse for later once they find a lifelong mate?
Teenagers are going to have sex, there is no stopping that. While it might not be ideal it is going to continue. There is no way to convince people to wait until they are 25/28 to have sex.
If you don't like the way things are done here, feel free to move elsewhere. I can google some flights for you. In fact, I'm d*mned good at making flight arrangements. May I suggest Somalia. Excellent country - no Medicaid and almost no govt, in case you're one of those, "there's too much government" nutjobs.
Actually I'm making do quite well ..... most states Medicaid doesn't paqy for elective abortions, Federal dollars don't pay for them at all. We may just have our first abortion free state soon, and a couple of others are coming along nicely.
Actually I'm making do quite well ..... most states Medicaid doesn't paqy for elective abortions, Federal dollars don't pay for them at all. We may just have our first abortion free state soon, and a couple of others are coming along nicely.
See, that's what pisses me off about you people. You have no problem with shoving your disgusting religion down other people's throats, do you?
Actually I'm making do quite well ..... most states Medicaid doesn't paqy for elective abortions, Federal dollars don't pay for them at all. We may just have our first abortion free state soon, and a couple of others are coming along nicely.
Those people will just travel to other states for the procedure, or Mexico, possibly Canada.
Is it or is it not possible that a pregnancy will result if a man and a woman engage in intercourse?
If your answer is yes - then the knowledge that this may occur, coupled with the willful decision to engage in such activity, is enough to prove that a possible pregnancy was planned.
Abortion just allows such decisions to be made with zero responsibility.
Engaging in activity that may result in a pregnancy and wanting a child should not be mutually exclusive.
No.....just because you have sex does not mean a pregnancy was planned.
Anymore than your decision to use a set of stairs means you planned to fall and break your leg.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.