Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Please tell me where it says hand guns will be banned.
Also tell me if you agree that stinger missiles and rocket launchers should be banned or not (as this bill proposes) ?
read the witches bill to get more insight. certain firearms that are considered pistols are named. also magazines are listed. reead up on the 2nd Amendment as well, stinger missles and rocket launchers are not for the individual citizen.
guess you didnt know that.
to me any laws at all against any Amendment in the Bill of Rights is unconstitutional.
read the witches bill to get more insight. certain firearms that are considered pistols are named. also magazines are listed. reead up on the 2nd Amendment as well, stinger missles and rocket launchers are not for the individual citizen.
guess you didnt know that.
to me any laws at all against any Amendment in the Bill of Rights is unconstitutional.
Banning handguns with more than 10 rounds? Yea I am all for it.
The Senator continues to point out that she witnessed two shootings in one incident as justification for the proposed legislation. What she does not say and nobody points out, is that the crime she witnessed was committed with a revolver, and the gunman simply reloaded and fired more rounds. Her proposed legislation is completely irrelevant to the crime she witnessed.
Banning handguns with more than 10 rounds? Yea I am all for it.
And, as in CA it does nothing about the current millions of hi cap mags already in existence. Or semi-auto rifles.
It's become a battle over an object. Even if passed it wouldn't prohibit me from buying a 10 round semi-auto. That gun would still accept my grandfathered hi-cap mags.
The Senator continues to point out that she witnessed two shootings in one incident as justification for the proposed legislation. What she does not say and nobody points out, is that the crime she witnessed was committed with a revolver, and the gunman simply reloaded and fired more rounds. Her proposed legislation is completely irrelevant to the crime she witnessed.
feinstein also forgets to add that she used to have one of the few CCW's in the whole san fransisco area.
Indeed; and she's now surrounded by people with "assault" weapons to keep her safe.
yep, if congress actually moves to ban misnamed lookalike assault rifles, then all politicians except for the potus does not get any kind of security for themselves. no government or private security. nothing, nada.
Good for her, but the power has to come from the Amer people. Congress is still too afraid of the gunners. What the gun industry knows is that the assault weapon ban impacted gun sales, that's what is most important to them. That is why the army of NRA operatives ^^, are working so hard to enlist more "soldiers" to to carry their nonsense message. They are losing that battle.
250,000 new members in a month is losing the battle?
As much as the cable media tries to persuade me, I do not see guns as a red vs blue issue. Too many people on both sides have guns for there to be meaningful change.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
