Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
.... but the republicans were willing to share the results,....
what results?
mccain never showed his birth certificate and romney, who had no official investigation, made available his contemporary state issued and certified COLB online....... exactly the same as obama ( the only 2 candidates to date to do so ).
I don't have time to read all those laws, let the law follow its course and verify Obama in the courts. Stop calling it a waste of time and start fearing it would be a massive embarrassment to the country we let a British national back at the helm of America.
..... let the law follow its course and verify Obama in the courts.
already happened. the GA ballot challenge. both the "2 US citizen parent" theory and the "kenyan birth" got presented to the court unchallenged ( the defense boycotted the proceedings )....... and both lost.
R Not that hard, Obama. Be challenged to your SSN origination dates, BOTH presented birth certificates, and then you can go on as POTUS.
But nooo, "tinfoil hats," "he's in thats all that matters," "waste of court resources better spent on banning guns."
Huh?
I'm not sure, because your post is really pretty much indecipherable and incoherent, but I think you're saying that President Obama can continue as POTUS *if* he provides his birth certificate and something about his Social Security number and if he doesn't ban guns?
Yes, Obama should at least be subpoenaed to one of these hearings. After which we, the citizens, do a class action lawsuit for the trillions he spent. We will recoup it from the British throne or just take Kenya. I'm not alone on this, visit any blog and they have the same thinking.
your graph has already been shot down in court. from the ankeny v daniels decision:
"Based upon the language of Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 and the guidance provided by Wong Kim Ark, we conclude that persons born within the borders of the United States are "natural born Citizens" for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents."
your graph has already been shot down in court. from the ankeny v daniels decision:
"Based upon the language of Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 and the guidance provided by Wong Kim Ark, we conclude that persons born within the borders of the United States are "natural born Citizens" for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents."
Nice try. I got it from a respectable blog. The first one I googled, in fact Ok, some misinformation is floating around out there, but it is not our job to prove Obama is not fit, that is for courts. Every trial gets shot down. The day REAL evidence gets called in, and O stands trial, we can all except the POTUS.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Ok, some misinformation is floating around out there, but it is not our job to prove Obama is not fit, that is for courts. Every trial gets shot down. The day REAL evidence gets called in, and O stands trial, we can all except the POTUS.
