Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-30-2013, 12:32 PM
 
1,724 posts, read 1,471,430 times
Reputation: 780

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
the 6 trillion in debt is from spending

lower revenue.....not really

revenue:

...........2003: 1.8 tril
...........2004: 1.9 trill
...........2005: 2.2 tril
...........2006: 2.4 trill
...........2007: 2.6 tril (peak)
...........2008: 2.5 trill
...........2009: 2.1 tril
...........2010: 2.2 tril
...........2011: 2.3 trillion
...........2012: 2.5 tril



so where is the lower revenue causing 6 trillion in debt???
On average tax receipts increased by 26% from Clinton to Bush. They have increased under 1% from Bush to Obama. Receipts were heavily depressed for years.
Historical Federal Receipt and Outlay Summary

Federal tax receipts are only barely above pre-recession levels.

Last edited by A Common Anomaly; 01-30-2013 at 12:44 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-30-2013, 12:32 PM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,951,723 times
Reputation: 5661
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
the 6 trillion in debt is from spending

lower revenue.....not really

revenue:

...........2003: 1.8 tril
...........2004: 1.9 trill
...........2005: 2.2 tril
...........2006: 2.4 trill
...........2007: 2.6 tril (peak)
...........2008: 2.5 trill
...........2009: 2.1 tril
...........2010: 2.2 tril
...........2011: 2.3 trillion
...........2012: 2.5 tril



so where is the lower revenue causing 6 trillion in debt???
You are mixing up debt and deficits. Deficits are the diff between spending and revenue on an annual basis. Debt is an accumulation of annual deficits and surpluses.

By your own figures, revenue dropped from 2.6 trillion in 2007 to 2.1 trillion in 2009. $500 billion is not significant to a $1.2 trillion deficit? Remember, the federal deficit was already $458.55 billion in 2008, before Obama was President. Subtract $500 billion in revenue from that and the deficit is already at a trillion dollars. Add a few hundred billion for stimulus and that's the deficit for 2009.

2013 revenue is expected to be $2,901.96 trillion. That's why the 2013 deficit is expected to fall by over $400 billion. The narrative that our deficits have exploded because Pres. Obama went on a spending spree is a zombie lie.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2013, 12:39 PM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,748,172 times
Reputation: 20674
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
I was just using Greece as the poster child. I did say austerity doesn't work like spending doesn't work.

Iceland is the only one who truly recovered. 4 years and they now have a surplus.
Compare that to 4 years of austerity or 4 years of spending. These have resulted in just more debt.
Iceland has a population of about 320,000 and is not far removed from a fish based economy.

Iceland also has a Nordic Welfare System and Universal Health Care for all.

What they don't have is defence, a military or crime.

Iceland's population is about 200K short of the least populated U.S. state and we sure don't rely on fish for the economy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2013, 12:39 PM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,488,320 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post
You are mixing up debt and deficits. Deficits are the diff between spending and revenue on an annual basis. Debt is an accumulation of annual deficits and surpluses.

By your own figures, revenue dropped from 2.6 trillion in 2007 to 2.1 trillion in 2009. $500 billion is not significant to a $1.2 trillion deficit? Remember, the federal deficit was already $458.55 billion in 2008, before Obama was President. Subtract $500 billion in revenue from that and the deficit is already at a trillion dollars. Add a few hundred billion for stimulus and that's the deficit for 2009.
I am not mixing up anything...you are just spinning


REVENUE for 2012..... 2.5 trillion.......spending for 2012 3.8 trillion....deficit.....1.3 trillion....total debt at the end of 2012(dec31) 16.4 trillion

fact bush spend quite heavily...and obusha has spent even more

fact debt when bush took over 5.87 trillion...when he was done...10.6 trillion (just under 5 trillion)almost double.....and now obusha has nearly doubled it again..adding 6 trillion in 4 years...with 4 more to go..........................is that your idea of utopia....22 trillion dollars of debt by 2016???????
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2013, 12:40 PM
 
Location: South Dakota
2,608 posts, read 2,097,333 times
Reputation: 769
Thats pretty sad considering all the people that accelerated income and purchases last year to avoid the 0bama tax hikes...

Now that were all hunkered down things will only get worse from here...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2013, 12:43 PM
 
1,724 posts, read 1,471,430 times
Reputation: 780
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
Not the way the economy is measured. They all do a great job but you can not grow an economy by hiring more of the above.
Wrong. State and local austerity measurements have been a drag on the economy.
Calculated Risk: GDP and Employment drag from State and Local Governments
Calculated Risk: Public and Private Sector Payroll Jobs: Bush and Obama
Three years into recovery, just how much has state and local austerity hurt job growth? | Economic Policy Institute

Investing into education, health care, public safety, and infrastructure not only improves the quality of lives of people, but it helps economic growth.

This idea that public teachers, health workers, cops, roads, bridges, etc. harms the economy or does nothing is nonsense. It is not based on any reasoning at all - it pure unsubstantiated, sophomoric opinion.

Quote:
Come on, not even you believe this. It's all on the news. The plan the Dem's are currently promoting is to not make the agreed to cuts and address the deficit with new taxes.
I seriously believe that you should move to Somalia if you want a stateless society. You are the one claiming that public employment is parasitic.

Quote:
There is nothing free.
And? I never said otherwise. Either you are going to start adding something of value to this conversation or it is over.

Last edited by A Common Anomaly; 01-30-2013 at 12:52 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2013, 12:44 PM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,488,320 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post
2013 revenue is expected to be $2,901.96 trillion. That's why the 2013 deficit is expected to fall by over $400 billion. The narrative that our deficits have exploded because Pres. Obama went on a spending spree is a zombie lie.
1. yes the """EXPECTED""" revenue is supposed to about 2.9 trillion.....I am sure we will see the usualy """UNEXPECTED""'

the economy just shrank...ss overdepelted (puts out more than bringing in)...medicare/medicad hitting 900 billion,,, unemployment extended again....you really think the deficit will fall??? if so I have a bridge to sell you


defict wont fall until spending is curtailed
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2013, 12:44 PM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,951,723 times
Reputation: 5661
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
I am not mixing up anything...you are just spinning


REVENUE for 2012..... 2.5 trillion.......spending for 2012 3.8 trillion....deficit.....1.3 trillion....total debt at the end of 2012(dec31) 16.4 trillion

fact bush spend quite heavily...and obusha has spent even more

fact debt when bush took over 5.87 trillion...when he was done...10.6 trillion (just under 5 trillion)almost double.....and now obusha has nearly doubled it again..adding 6 trillion in 4 years...with 4 more to go..........................is that your idea of utopia....22 trillion dollars of debt by 2016???????
The 2009, $1.3 trillion deficit you attribute to Pres. Obama. however, that was Bush's budget and two weeks before Mr. Obama was inaugurated the CBO was already projecting that deficit.

Quote:
CBO projects record $1.2 trillion deficit - Jan. 7, 2009
That revenue decline, in turn, is the biggest reason for the worsening outlook over the next decade, said Diane Lim Rogers, chief economist at the Concord Coalition, a deficit watchdog group. "The revenue effect is huge."
Tell me, how did Obama cause the 2009 deficit when it was projected two weeks before he was President?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2013, 12:44 PM
 
14,292 posts, read 9,678,440 times
Reputation: 4254
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post
The narrative that our deficits have exploded because Pres. Obama went on a spending spree is a zombie lie.
So federal spending has not been at historical highs under Obama?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2013, 12:45 PM
 
17,401 posts, read 11,978,162 times
Reputation: 16155
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boss View Post
Its amazing how people do not understand that Gov't spending in the private sector helps create private sector Jobs. Watch and learn
With all the spending going on, why isn't the unemployment rate lower? Oh yeah, cause it's a bunch of bull.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:13 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top