Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-04-2013, 12:43 PM
 
Location: FL
1,138 posts, read 3,349,017 times
Reputation: 792

Advertisements

Looks like a very expensive over and under Browning shotgun too! Wonder who paid for that?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-04-2013, 12:54 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles, California
4,373 posts, read 3,230,467 times
Reputation: 1041
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.XXX View Post
Obama's mentor Frank Marshall an avowed communist...I guarantee that if you were to give Obama sodium pentothal he would confess being a marxist.
Even if that were true, that doesn't make Obama a Communist or Marxist. As I said, you have no idea what those even are so you have no right in attempting to label anyone as a Communist or a Marxist.

It's cute to see you try time and time again though. So if we're going with your mentality, would that make a Republican in office a Fascist then? I mean if the shoe fits, right?


Quote:
Typical left...can't handle the truth...resort to playing race card...yawn.
Typical Left? Dude, I'm an Independent/Moderate or for sake of ease I'm a Centrist. Not liberal, not conservative. And I'm not playing the race card - where did I ever mention anything about race in my post?

I didn't, though nice try. Now go read up on what Marxism is and who Karl Marx was before you blindly throw your bigoted crap everywhere. Unless that's too much for your brain to handle?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2013, 12:54 PM
 
4,738 posts, read 4,436,809 times
Reputation: 2485
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.XXX View Post
All,

You better be careful not to upset our dear Marxist leader...otherwise hello "Gulags"

White House Warns: Don't Photoshop Obama Gun Pic
Hmm. . .you really need a history lesson. Try typing in marxist in Wikipedia.

Oh. . .oh i see, you know he isn't marxist. your just a 3rd grade level debater creating name "straw men" for your own trolling amusement

nevermind then


https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/i...OP58QXmQgQZ7WI

Last edited by CaseyB; 02-04-2013 at 01:31 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2013, 12:55 PM
 
28,164 posts, read 25,318,510 times
Reputation: 16665
Quote:
Originally Posted by ringwise View Post
Oh yea, here we go. Oversimplification, ala "granny will DIE if we cut spending" liberals, complete with eye rolls.

The Oval Office has to bend to security concerns. What sort of breach of security happens if you use an image put out by the WH?

Figures, liberals are defending the Idiot-in-Chief. As his record with the Courts has shown, he's pretty much wrong about EVERYTHING.
The fact of the matter is that nothing is without limits or rules and usually its for good reason. The reason I used the White House example is because it's just as immature and silly as some of the claims I've seen on this thread.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2013, 12:56 PM
 
Location: Staten Island, NY
6,476 posts, read 7,326,616 times
Reputation: 7026
Quote:
Originally Posted by thecoalman View Post
Matter of fact the link for the license is right there:

The WH needs a class on copyright law.
Constitutional Law first, then they can get around to Copyright Law.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2013, 12:56 PM
 
7,541 posts, read 6,274,533 times
Reputation: 1837
Quote:
Originally Posted by Memphis1979 View Post
Its saying you can do whatever you want for personal use, but like most private property, the NRA can't use it in a gun add without permission.

Overblown, half informed BS thread

I was like, did any one read the copyright notification? Its not for commercial use. Used in the Press; cool. Private use (where you aren't selling it, or using it to make money); cool.

but you can't use it to make money. So, no putting the image on shirts or coffee cups.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2013, 12:58 PM
 
7,541 posts, read 6,274,533 times
Reputation: 1837
Quote:
Originally Posted by AeroGuyDC View Post
Taxpayers funded the pictures.
No, they didn't.

Quote:
Taxpayers own the pictures.
No, they don't.

Quote:
The White House can say what it wants about not altering the pictures, but there is NO COPYRIGHT on government documents.
Actually yes, there is copyright on government documents. Ie a Government owning a patent or a trademark and actually owns a copyright.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2013, 01:09 PM
 
17,401 posts, read 11,982,916 times
Reputation: 16155
Quote:
Originally Posted by Magritte25 View Post
The fact of the matter is that nothing is without limits or rules and usually its for good reason. The reason I used the White House example is because it's just as immature and silly as some of the claims I've seen on this thread.
But the fact remains, the WH photos do not fall under copyright protected images. So, wanting it so, does not make it so. The fact of the matter is that there IS something without limits or rules, and that would be the images put out by the WH.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2013, 01:17 PM
 
23,838 posts, read 23,134,648 times
Reputation: 9409
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arus View Post
No, they didn't.



No, they don't.



Actually yes, there is copyright on government documents. Ie a Government owning a patent or a trademark and actually owns a copyright.
Yes, taxpayers did pay for the pictures. Yes, taxpayers do own the pictures.

Who the hell do you think pays for the Executive Branch, the White House photographer, etc?

Barack Obama?

Everything that makes its way to the National Archives is a taxpayer owned entity. That's why taxpayers get to go and look and use and research at the National Archives.

And for the love of God, who said anything about a patent????? White House pictures are not subject to any ****ing patent.

Let me guess....you're a raging liberal whose intent is to defend this President at all costs, facts be damned, right??!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2013, 01:22 PM
 
Location: Sango, TN
24,868 posts, read 24,399,838 times
Reputation: 8672
Quote:
Originally Posted by thecoalman View Post
This is not private property, it belongs to no one. It's a gift to the world from the American people is the best way to describe it. They can't state what they have in that disclaimer. As far as the NRA using it for political commentary, depends on how they used it.

Private photos of the president do not belong to Americans. Never has, never will, unless they donate them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:46 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top