Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-10-2013, 03:11 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles County, CA
29,094 posts, read 26,021,470 times
Reputation: 6128

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by css9450 View Post
Actually it is. You're the one who claimed its a choice.

Remember saying that?
Since the alternative to it being a choice is a biological causation, one first must establish the biological causation in order for choice to be ruled out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-10-2013, 11:21 PM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,496,494 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by css9450 View Post
LOL You still think its a choice? Oh how quaint! Hey look its 1950 all over again.
how quaint you say its not a choice....

well then....

you say its not a choice...so we will say your statment is FACT then..its not a choice

then it must be something they are born with..like having 6 toes, or being albino, or having autism

since the pattern is neurologic (ie thoughts and actions) it certainly could be listed as a defect or mis-wiring just like aspergers or autism

if we agree that it is something they are 'born with' ......then its is an ABNORMALITY. then why not just define it as what it is...a BIRTH DEFECT,,,a DISABILITY...a NEUROLOGICAL CONDITION..a GENETIC ABNORMALITY.....just like downs syndrome, or autism, or aspergers

if it is not a choice (freewill, and the freedom to choose), and its something you are born with,,,,then it MUST be a defect from the norm
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2013, 11:38 PM
 
554 posts, read 608,985 times
Reputation: 696
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harrier View Post
Do you have evidence to demonstrate that it is genetic?

Where is the "gay gene"?
There's plenty of evidence that homosexuality is predominantly determined by biology. I'll give you one example: twin studies.

You can research other evidence on your own.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2013, 11:43 PM
 
Location: The Cascade Foothills
10,942 posts, read 10,259,187 times
Reputation: 6476
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
how quaint you say its not a choice....

well then....

you say its not a choice...so we will say your statment is FACT then..its not a choice

then it must be something they are born with..like having 6 toes, or being albino, or having autism

since the pattern is neurologic (ie thoughts and actions) it certainly could be listed as a defect or mis-wiring just like aspergers or autism

if we agree that it is something they are 'born with' ......then its is an ABNORMALITY. then why not just define it as what it is...a BIRTH DEFECT,,,a DISABILITY...a NEUROLOGICAL CONDITION..a GENETIC ABNORMALITY.....just like downs syndrome, or autism, or aspergers

if it is not a choice (freewill, and the freedom to choose), and its something you are born with,,,,then it MUST be a defect from the norm
Why does it have to be considered a "defect?" Why does someone who is different from YOU have to be considered (by you) to be defective?

It could be like being born left handed or with red hair or with blue eyes. Not defective, just different from you (unless you are a blue eyed red head who is left handed).

It is what it is.

Anyway, who cares?

People are people, and even if it is a choice (which I don't think it is), why can't we just accept people for their choices and for who they are? As long as those choices aren't hurting you (and, no, letting gays participate in Scouts is NOT going to hurt you, anymore than your next door neighbors, Jane and Joan, getting married will), then what's the big deal?

Why don't you all just friggin' focus your energies on something that matters? Spend your time and your money trying to fix real problems instead of trying to dictate to others who they should love.

(And for the record, I found your post to be very offensive, not that I think you care. That's one thing we can all count on with people like you - total lack of compassion and empathy for others you deem to be "different.")
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-11-2013, 12:12 AM
 
554 posts, read 608,985 times
Reputation: 696
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cinebar View Post
Why does it have to be considered a "defect?" Why does someone who is different from YOU have to be considered (by you) to be defective?

It could be like being born left handed or with red hair or with blue eyes. Not defective, just different from you (unless you are a blue eyed red head who is left handed).

It is what it is.

Anyway, who cares?

People are people, and even if it is a choice (which I don't think it is), why can't we just accept people for their choices and for who they are? As long as those choices aren't hurting you (and, no, letting gays participate in Scouts is NOT going to hurt you, anymore than your next door neighbors, Jane and Joan, getting married will), then what's the big deal?

Why don't you all just friggin' focus your energies on something that matters? Spend your time and your money trying to fix real problems instead of trying to dictate to others who they should love.

(And for the record, I found your post to be very offensive, not that I think you care. That's one thing we can all count on with people like you - total lack of compassion and empathy for others you deem to be "different.")
They (the homophobes) will never, ever answer that seminal question, "what business is it of yours ?"

Who someone is sleeping with, sexing with, cohabiting with, and/or marrying ... it doesn't affect them in any way possible. But they can't get it out of their minds. It offends their circumscribed moral universe.

Fortunately, their views are not carrying the day. I laugh at them. I pity them. Their lives must be so empty and without meaning.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-11-2013, 05:31 AM
 
Location: "Chicago"
1,866 posts, read 2,851,571 times
Reputation: 870
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
if we agree that it is something they are 'born with' ......then its is an ABNORMALITY. then why not just define it as what it is...a BIRTH DEFECT,,,a DISABILITY...a NEUROLOGICAL CONDITION..a GENETIC ABNORMALITY.....just like downs syndrome, or autism, or aspergers
You're being rather extreme, but just for the benefit of the doubt, I'll humor you.

Those with Downs syndrome, autism or aspergers can serve in the boy scouts, can they not? They can get married too. Why not gay people? No one is going to catch gayness from a gay kid in the scouts or from a gay scoutmaster.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-11-2013, 08:06 AM
 
Location: Columbia, SC
37,219 posts, read 19,225,735 times
Reputation: 14919
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gurbie View Post
Rick Perry told a Boy Scouts of America convention that he hopes the organization will continue to ban membership of gay scouts and scout masters. Perry says he hopes the BSA will uphold its "traditional values", and that scouting is "no place to learn about sexuality"

Gov. Perry: Boy Scouts should keep no-gay policy

I hate to keep whacking you good people of Texas over the head with an inflatable mallet... But you elected this guy governor HOW MANY TIMES???
I wish Perry would quit screwing around and come out of the closet. It's not like he's fooling anybody...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2013, 09:31 AM
 
2 posts, read 1,318 times
Reputation: 10
Why do you think gays would be more trustworthy as scoutmasters than they are as priests? Scouting is about SCOUTING. Any attempt to make scouting a sexual platform of any sort, should bring immediate dismissal, either of a scoutleader or of a scout.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2013, 09:49 AM
 
2 posts, read 1,318 times
Reputation: 10
Nice tactics of predatory gay political groups to make recognizing the reality of concern of children a matter of discrimination. It is NOT a rumor that too many gay men see boys as sexual prey. To paint innocuous images of adult gays, male and female, embracing and in no way intrinsically different from heterosexual couples is to create an umbrella for a very diverse group. There are gay groups which prey specifically on very small boys, infancy onward. Just as there are relatively few females who prey sexually on children compared to males, so two males in a couple would not augur well for children on a massive scale.There are gays who like to kill boys, there are gay groups which exist solely for the purpose of defusing societys' protections of children under 10, 12, 16 etc. from sexual depredation. They all try to fit, for political purposes, into the sweet, innocuous image of m-m, w-w, gazing
with total concentration into each other eyes. However there are gay groups which advocate
gays setting themselves up as couples to become legally entitled to adopt boys. Under the broad umbrella such of political correctness, there would be little or no protection for the children, boys, such sexual predators legally obtain. Gay predator groups already know this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2013, 10:20 AM
 
7,359 posts, read 5,466,305 times
Reputation: 3142
Quote:
Originally Posted by EHunter7 View Post
Why do you think gays would be more trustworthy as scoutmasters than they are as priests? Scouting is about SCOUTING. Any attempt to make scouting a sexual platform of any sort, should bring immediate dismissal, either of a scoutleader or of a scout.
I think gays would be exactly as trustworthy as scoutmasters as they are as priests, which is to say the same as straight people. Being gay does not make you less trustworthy and no more priests molest kids than the general population does. It's just that more attention gets paid to it because they are priests.

I see no reason the boy scouts shouldn't accept gay scouts and scoutmasters, and also no reason they should be forced to if they don't want to.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:39 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top