Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
this is comical oldboy. you start a thread titled "What is a natural born citizen?" ( a major element in the birther debate), people from both sides of the political spectrum start discussing what is a natural born citizen and then you get bent that it pertains to birtherism. it's like starting a thread "Who Should Be Admitted Into Cooperstown?", linking to an article about hall-of-fame ticket prices...... then getting your panties in a bunch when the conversation becomes about baseball.
Here come da Judge with more of his leaner crap. I know that you don't want to here the man read a letter from a leaner from North Carolina. Why would you have to keep on about this since we both know that you are so superior in thinking to Rush Limbaugh. You must get all your Rush stuff from Stink prog.
He is "superior in thinking to Rush Limbaugh".
Dang, the 6-year old next door is. And so's his dog.
Chill, roysoldboy. You keep up this level of anger... you're going to bust a gusset.
When you throw in the 14th Amendment which was written at the end of the Civil War to make sure that all freed slaves were considered to be citizens and the Constitution applied to them you have overstepped your boundaries. That Amendment applies to exactly nobody alive in this country today. All those people it applied to have been dead for sometime. Maybe the next change we make in the Constitution should be to knock out this no longer needed amendment so people like you wouldn't be trying to apply it to people born after 1961.
The 14th Amendment does not apply to "people", Roy.
It applies to persons.
Corporations are persons.
The Supreme Court has not yet decided what exactly "alive" means.
The Court needs to read Ayn Rand's "We the living."
"We the Living is a complex and intriguing narrative that plays on the impressions of human will. The tale of three people - Kira, Andrei and Leo - seems to represent three different attitudes to oppression. Kira represents the ideal resolute who perseveres against all hurdles, while being realistic. Andrei, a man of impeccable character, is nevertheless ruined because of his affiliations to the wrong side of the political fence. Leo, an idealist, loses his energy very early in the struggle due to his uncompromising nature towards life. Ultimately, the author portrays a very dark scene where the role of the individual is diminished to such an extent where morality as a virtue ceases to exist and is replaced by a need for existence and individual assertion."
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
