Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-26-2013, 11:35 PM
 
Location: CHicago, United States
6,933 posts, read 8,495,383 times
Reputation: 3510

Advertisements

Quote:
On sequestration, the GOP is the adult in the room


Hardly. The GOP, the current leadership if the GOP, promotes Anti-American proposals. They're the American Taliban. Domestic terrorists.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-26-2013, 11:59 PM
 
10,553 posts, read 9,651,677 times
Reputation: 4784
Ben Bernake warned Congress today that the sequester spending cuts "would threaten an already challenged economic expansion," and added that, "The Congress and the administration should consider replacing the sharp, frontloaded spending cuts required by the sequestration, with policies that reduce the federal deficit more gradually in the near term but more substantially in the longer run."


Bernanke says Fed stimulus benefits clear, downplays risks | Reuters
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2013, 12:45 AM
 
3,040 posts, read 2,579,429 times
Reputation: 665
Quote:
Originally Posted by gomexico View Post

Hardly. The GOP, the current leadership if the GOP, promotes Anti-American proposals. They're the American Taliban. Domestic terrorists.
That would be the Democrats assaulting the constitution and stealing from the working folks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2013, 12:59 AM
 
Location: Portland, OR
8,802 posts, read 8,899,643 times
Reputation: 4512
Quote:
Originally Posted by ellemint View Post
Ben Bernake warned Congress today that the sequester spending cuts "would threaten an already challenged economic expansion," and added that, "The Congress and the administration should consider replacing the sharp, frontloaded spending cuts required by the sequestration, with policies that reduce the federal deficit more gradually in the near term but more substantially in the longer run."


Bernanke says Fed stimulus benefits clear, downplays risks | Reuters
Bernanke also said there was no housing bubble.

Bernanke: There's No Housing Bubble to Go Bust
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2013, 03:07 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,634,918 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post
Seems like there was a big employment drop when Harding cut spending:

Ya, like your chart shows, Harding took office in 1921.

Unemployment soon started dropping, within the year.
More revenue was generated for the government in taxes, too.

The other 1/2 of that ticket, Coolidge....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2013, 03:48 AM
 
1,458 posts, read 1,398,723 times
Reputation: 787
Quote:
Originally Posted by ellemint View Post
Quote:
"The budget deficit isn’t our biggest problem, by a long shot. Furthermore, it’s a problem that is already, to a large degree, solved. The medium-term budget outlook isn’t great, but it’s not terrible either — and the long-term outlook gets much more attention than it should."

Exactly. And Krugman also refers to a study by the non-partisan CBO budget office showing that:

"after taking into account the spending cuts agreed to in 2011, amounting to almost $1.5 trillion over the next decade; and the roughly $600 billion in tax increases on the affluent agreed to at the beginning of this year, it projects that the ratio of debt to G.D.P., the standard measure of America’s debt position, will be only modestly higher in 2022 than it is now.

The center calls for another $1.4 trillion in deficit reduction, which would completely stabilize the debt ratio; President Obama has called for roughly the same amount. Even without such actions, however, the budget outlook for the next 10 years doesn’t look at all alarming."


http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/18/op...t&emc=rss&_r=0

So, by 2022, the Ratio will be modestly higher? Kind of like paying the minimum on your credit cards.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2013, 04:01 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,634,918 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by gomexico View Post

Hardly. The GOP, the current leadership if the GOP, promotes Anti-American proposals. They're the American Taliban. Domestic terrorists.


George Washington was a domestic terrorist. I like the company!


LOL!

Hey Einstein....
How does if feel to be beat at your own game?
As a Conservative, the idea is to cut spending. Sure the majority of the GOP signed it. Why wouldn't they. Obama signed it, why??? He surely doesn't want to cut spending and he is the one squacking loud. The GOP is getting exactly what they wanted. A cut in additional Federal Government spending.

If you have not been paying attention, the GOP has been shouting cut spending at the top of their lungs. Well guess what. Obama has been trapped into doing just that!!

Hahahaha! How does it feel? LOL!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2013, 04:48 AM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,951,723 times
Reputation: 5661
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jean71 View Post
They are NOT cuts! Jeezus christ.

Its a budget reduction. We are still spending more than last year!

Why is that so hard to understand??
And revenues are higher than last year. Due to inflation and population growth, spending and revenues will normally be greater than the years past.

But I don't know how many times I have to repeat that it's foolhardy to cut sprinting in a weak economy. Class, pay attention.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2013, 04:52 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,634,918 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post
And revenues are higher than last year. Due to inflation and population growth, spending and revenues will normally be greater than the years past.

But I don't know how many times I have to repeat that it's foolhardy to cut sprinting in a weak economy. Class, pay attention.

Government creates inflation, to fool the ignorant into paying for their over spending.
Is this a perpetual motion machine, they created?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2013, 05:13 AM
 
Location: New Orleans, La. USA
6,354 posts, read 3,655,406 times
Reputation: 2522
Quote:
Originally Posted by VTHokieFan View Post
Cuts are needed to our federal spending. Democrats got their tax increases, now it's time to pay the piper on the other side of the aisle and stop the gravy train in DC.

While the Democrats look at this whole issue as a way to drum up support against the GOP citing polls and charts where blame would be cast, and posing wild and uninformed sensationalist end-of-world scenarios for sequestration effects, the GOP is (hopefully) standing firm regardless of what's popular and will see these cuts through.

Democrats, this is $85 billion out of $3+trillion in spending, quit complaining, quit whining, quit LYING, and grow up.
We need to stop republican tax cuts that created our deficits to start with.

Then we need to realize Fox news is telling its listeners 100's of lies.
Lies like "the democrats are the big spenders."

Then we need to stop republican trickle down economics, and raise billionaires tax rates above 17%.

Then we need to educate you, about how that gravy train keeps your family safe. That gravy train is paying your families unemployment benefits, Social Security, giving them insurance, giving them safe food, and welfare is stopping a whole bunch of poor people from doing crime.



But since your a Fox news follower, Fox news has already told you what needs to be done.
And what are you gonna do ??

Your gonna support tax cuts like these,
Romney's Economic Plan Includes $6.6 Trillion Tax Cut For The Rich And Corporations | ThinkProgress

And since your tax cuts decrease government revenues, the government will not have the money to fund government services for your family. So your gonna talk about needing to cut government spending.

Then your gonna talk about things like, CEO's "rights" to pay their workers low wages.
And then its more tax cuts for the rich, and then its more budget cuts.

Last edited by chad3; 02-27-2013 at 05:54 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:42 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top