Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Of course he's a racist -- in his concurring opinion in Arizona v. United States, he used the fact that after the Civil War Southern states enacted laws prohibiting the internal migration of freed slaves as legal precedence for the Arizona law.
He's also a raging hypocrite, demanding originalism, then ruling that the word 'people' and 'persons' in the Constitution applies to corporations (yeah, the Founders meant that, Antonin... uh huh ). He arrogantly insists that only the law, not the effects of a potential judicial ruling, are relevant to a decision, then rails against the majority opinion in Lawrence v. Texas because... of the effects the ruling will have. Scalia and his (unfortunately young) clone, Alito, are repugnant.
I don't have much use for Clarence Thomas, but at least his rulings are internally consistent and logically coherent from one to the next.
Thanks for epitomizing the stance of the left. No quote, no link, no evidence just an accusation. Sentence first, verdict aftwards!" per Alice in Wonderland.
There should be some national standards for voting but other than that, forcing a handful of states to report any change of policies to the Fed is unnecessary. I'm not sure if it's "unconstitutional" but unnecessary.
There should be some national standards for voting but other than that, forcing a handful of states to report any change of policies to the Fed is unnecessary. I'm not sure if it's "unconstitutional" but unnecessary.
Status:
"everybody getting reported now.."
(set 24 days ago)
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,558 posts, read 16,548,014 times
Reputation: 6042
Quote:
Originally Posted by MiamiRob
The Voting Rights Act is a "perpetuation of Racial Entitlement"? This is a Justice of our Supreme Court?
This does not make him racist.
Alot of right wingers feel that it is no longer, my problem is they have no proof. Krystal Ball said that 81% of the voter rights complains that won their cases came from the states that are part of the Voter rights act, she mentioned the source, but i cant remember it.
The Voting Rights Act is a "perpetuation of Racial Entitlement"? This is a Justice of our Supreme Court?
Very likely he is. And it's clear by his record of comments, he's a hard core right wing partisan.
Objective legal scholars have noted how unprofessional his comments/actions have been that may give some the "impression" of him being biased. You don't do that when you are a SCOTUS Judge.
Quail hunting with Dick Cheney just as an example.
He's just getting senile and we'll be rid of this guy soon.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
). He arrogantly insists that only the law, not the effects of a potential judicial ruling, are relevant to a decision, then rails against the majority opinion in Lawrence v. Texas because... of the effects the ruling will have. Scalia and his (unfortunately young) clone, Alito, are repugnant.
