Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-10-2013, 03:37 PM
 
1,523 posts, read 1,438,872 times
Reputation: 356

Advertisements

This is alarming. John Brennan requested that he wanted to be sworn in using the original draft of the Constitution, dating from 1787, which has George Washington’s personal handwriting and annotations on it. That means, when Brennan vowed to protect and defend the Constitution, he was swearing on one that did not include the First, Second Fourth, Fifth, or Sixth Amendments — or any of the other Amendments now included in our Constitution. The Bill of Rights did not become part of our Constitution until 1791, 4 years after the Constitution that Brennan took his oath on. Another thing that is troubling is that Brennan was allowed to use his uncovered hands to handle the document


Vice President Joe Biden swears in CIA Director John Brennan at the White House, March 8, 2013.


Brennan takes oath on draft Constitution—without Bill of Rights
Brennan takes oath on draft Constitution
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-10-2013, 04:01 PM
 
26,584 posts, read 14,454,648 times
Reputation: 7441
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Army Soldier View Post
Another thing that is troubling is that Brennan was allowed to use his uncovered hands to handle the document
look at your own photo there champ. brennan isn't touching the actual document.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-10-2013, 04:04 PM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,083,461 times
Reputation: 3954
And in the bizarro hallucinatory world of right wing crankery, this means what? That the Bill of Rights has magically disappeared?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-10-2013, 04:12 PM
 
Location: New London County, CT
8,949 posts, read 12,140,576 times
Reputation: 5145
Ummm..

How would the original draft of the Constitution include the Bill of Rights?!?! They were part of a compromise that got the Constitution passed. They weren't in the draft document...

Good grief.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-10-2013, 04:13 PM
 
Location: Texas State Fair
8,560 posts, read 11,217,763 times
Reputation: 4258
He was sworn in according to form. He has the same obligation as any other Director of the CIA.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-10-2013, 04:27 PM
 
32,516 posts, read 37,189,293 times
Reputation: 32581
Quote:
Originally Posted by HistorianDude View Post
That the Bill of Rights has magically disappeared?
Perhaps we should call Nicholas Cage.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-10-2013, 04:35 PM
 
2,635 posts, read 3,512,367 times
Reputation: 1686
... And, he didn't take the oath on a BIBLE. This must mean he's a Secular Humanist Agnostic Neo-Pagan Satanist National-Socialist Socialist.

To celebrate they probably sacrificed a goat and burned its blood.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-10-2013, 04:37 PM
 
13,694 posts, read 9,014,113 times
Reputation: 10416
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Army Soldier View Post
This is alarming. John Brennan requested that he wanted to be sworn in using the original draft of the Constitution, dating from 1787, which has George Washington’s personal handwriting and annotations on it. That means, when Brennan vowed to protect and defend the Constitution, he was swearing on one that did not include the First, Second Fourth, Fifth, or Sixth Amendments — or any of the other Amendments now included in our Constitution. The Bill of Rights did not become part of our Constitution until 1791, 4 years after the Constitution that Brennan took his oath on. Another thing that is troubling is that Brennan was allowed to use his uncovered hands to handle the document


Vice President Joe Biden swears in CIA Director John Brennan at the White House, March 8, 2013.


Brennan takes oath on draft Constitution—without Bill of Rights
Brennan takes oath on draft Constitution

I'm interested: is this YOUR interpretation of this event, or did you read it someone and repeat it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-10-2013, 04:43 PM
 
2,635 posts, read 3,512,367 times
Reputation: 1686
Quote:
Originally Posted by legalsea View Post
I'm interested: is this YOUR interpretation of this event, or did you read it someone and repeat it?
Copy-pasta from WND:
No Bible for Brennan swearing in

Old Army Soldier doesn't think, he bounces straight from the RWNJ Echo Chamber.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-10-2013, 04:50 PM
 
7,359 posts, read 5,465,596 times
Reputation: 3142
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Army Soldier View Post
This is alarming. John Brennan requested that he wanted to be sworn in using the original draft of the Constitution, dating from 1787, which has George Washington’s personal handwriting and annotations on it. That means, when Brennan vowed to protect and defend the Constitution, he was swearing on one that did not include the First, Second Fourth, Fifth, or Sixth Amendments — or any of the other Amendments now included in our Constitution. The Bill of Rights did not become part of our Constitution until 1791, 4 years after the Constitution that Brennan took his oath on. Another thing that is troubling is that Brennan was allowed to use his uncovered hands to handle the document


Vice President Joe Biden swears in CIA Director John Brennan at the White House, March 8, 2013.


Brennan takes oath on draft Constitution—without Bill of Rights
Brennan takes oath on draft Constitution
Whatever he put his hand on when he took the oath, he still took the oath to uphold the constitution. It wasn't an oath to defend what I've got my hand on, it was an oath to defend the constitution. What he's swearing on isn't relevant to that.

Besides which, the oath means nothing anyway. It's just a ceremony. I mean if Congress makes a law that the Supreme Court finds unconstitutional then do we prosecute everyone who voted for it? They aren't held to the oath anyway. Obama took an oath to the constitution and has violated it over and over again with his executive orders and threats to act if Congress doesn't and spending money on things the constitution doesn't authorize and such.

I think you're concerned about nothing here. I have no doubt that Brennan is going to break his oath. There has never been a Democrat in recent memory who hasn't. But I don't think the document he had his hand on when he took the oath is anything to get upset about.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:28 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top