Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 03-28-2013, 11:27 AM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,951,723 times
Reputation: 5661

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
oh, unless of course we're discussing the tax cuts by Clinton, right? Then of course magic fairies come down and make sure we have increased revenues from tax cuts..
Clinton is noted for RAISING taxes, which apart from Republican claims of disaster, coincided with the largest increase in GDP in history.

Quote:
Rep. Newt Gingrich (R-GA), February 2, 1993: We have all too many people in the Democratic administration who are talking about bigger Government, bigger bureaucracy, more programs, and higher taxes. I believe that that will in fact kill the current recovery and put us back in a recession. It might take 1 1/2 or 2 years, but it will happen. (Congressional Record, 1993, Thomas)

Rep. Bill Archer (R-TX), May 24, 1993: I would much rather be here today supporting the President and I would do so if his proposals could expect to increase jobs and the standard of living for Americans, but I believe his massive tax increases will do just the opposite. (Congressional Record, 1993, Thomas)

Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R-GA), July 13, 1993: Small businesses generate the bulk of this Nation’s new jobs. And they will be the hardest hit by the Clinton tax-and-spend budget. Because, when you raise taxes, you kill jobs. (Congressional Record, 1993, Thomas)

Rep. Christopher Cox (R-CA), May, 27, 1993: This is really the Dr. Kevorkian plan for our economy. It will kill jobs, kill businesses, and yes, kill even the higher tax revenues that these suicidal tax increasers hope to gain. (Congressional Record, 1993, Page: H2949)

 
Old 03-28-2013, 11:27 AM
Status: "everybody getting reported now.." (set 23 days ago)
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,556 posts, read 16,542,682 times
Reputation: 6041
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
Are you this dumb? Living in todays economy are are seriously asking the effects of a recession on revenues to the federal government?

Guess what numbskull, we arent in a current recession either, but yet revenues remain lower than they were a few years ago, dont they?
2009 Revenue 2.105 Trillion( last year of recession)
2010 Revenue 2.162 Trillion
2011 Revenue 2.303 Trillion ( 2012 numbers havent been finalized.)
2012 Revenue 2.468 Trillion

want to try again.
 
Old 03-28-2013, 11:30 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,118,301 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post
Clinton is noted for RAISING taxes, which apart from Republican claims of disaster, coincided with the largest increase in GDP in history.
Which totally flopped, THEN he cut taxes on 90% of busiensses and slashed capital gains rates from 28% to 20%.

Stop embarassing yourself
 
Old 03-28-2013, 11:31 AM
 
Location: Whoville....
25,386 posts, read 35,546,439 times
Reputation: 14692
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chicago60614 View Post
What about the right? They're not exactly doing anything either.

We need to raise our revenues (which are a smaller % of GDP by far than they've been since we even came up with our system) as well as cut spending.
The right isn't running the show. The left is.
 
Old 03-28-2013, 11:32 AM
Status: "everybody getting reported now.." (set 23 days ago)
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,556 posts, read 16,542,682 times
Reputation: 6041
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
Which totally flopped, THEN he cut taxes on 90% of busiensses and slashed capital gains rates from 28% to 20%.

Stop embarassing yourself
Which was still above the rate at which he started for the original tax increase. Which would mean there was still a net tax increase.
 
Old 03-28-2013, 11:33 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,118,301 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251 View Post
2009 Revenue 2.105 Trillion( last year of recession)
2010 Revenue 2.162 Trillion
2011 Revenue 2.303 Trillion ( 2012 numbers havent been finalized.)
2012 Revenue 2.468 Trillion

want to try again.
Which is still lower than 2007 revenues

Hell, you quoted them a few pages ago, now you're playing dumb again.
 
Old 03-28-2013, 11:35 AM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,951,723 times
Reputation: 5661
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
Which totally flopped, THEN he cut taxes on 90% of busiensses and slashed capital gains rates from 28% to 20%.

Stop embarassing yourself
Clinton's 1993 tax increase flopped? Do you just make up your facts?

...
 
Old 03-28-2013, 11:36 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,118,301 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251 View Post
Which was still above the rate at which he started for the original tax increase. Which would mean there was still a net tax increase.
 
Old 03-28-2013, 11:37 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,118,301 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post
Clinton's tax increases flopped? Do you just make up your facts?

...
GDP only grew 3.3%, and wages FELL after the tax increases.. Do people's income not matter to you, or are you all concerned with ONLY the federal government?
.

Last edited by CaseyB; 03-28-2013 at 03:22 PM.. Reason: name calling
 
Old 03-28-2013, 11:41 AM
Status: "everybody getting reported now.." (set 23 days ago)
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,556 posts, read 16,542,682 times
Reputation: 6041
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
Which is still lower than 2007 revenues

Hell, you quoted them a few pages ago, now you're playing dumb again.
December is the only month in 2007 that is included in the recession, the year you should be using is 2008 and 2009.

my point stands. Recessions didnt cause the dip in revenue tax cuts did.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:41 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top