Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I don't know how military law works - was he considered a soldier during his Presidency? If so, then maybe you should write to the military and request he be treated as one.
Well, for your answer, I might suggest you look at how libs defend 0bama's 'military' experience when it's pointed out he has none. They get all het up about it.
There has been a rash of thread lately that claim that President Bush and Vice President Cheney are guilty of war crimes. The same partisanship behind such nonsense is also responsible for people on the left asserting that the charges against Clinton are not proven, and that he should be considered innocent until proven guilty. The same partisan hacks want to hang Bush and Cheney. Do you see how this works?
Tone down the rhetoric.
Has there been any attempt to try Bush and Cheney for those crimes?
There has been a rash of thread lately that claim that President Bush and Vice President Cheney are guilty of war crimes. The same partisanship behind such nonsense is also responsible for people on the left asserting that the charges against Clinton are not proven, and that he should be considered innocent until proven guilty. The same partisan hacks want to hang Bush and Cheney. Do you see how this works?
Tone down the rhetoric.
Ditto to all the Republicans who continuously show partisan bias... the rhetoric is stupid and divisive, no matter which side it is coming from IMO.
So, was that your whole point in starting this thread? If so, you are making a point that applies to all people regardless of their political persuasion.
It's called public urination or indecent exposure and will require you register as a sex offender. The catch 22 is somebody has to catch you in order to punish you. Some states are reviewing that piece of legislation and considering excluding it.
So you're saying it's a federal law? Do you have a cite? I still find it hard to believe such a things, ESPECIALLY a federal law. State statutes seem to have very specific criteria which have to be met before someone is classified as a sex offender.
Public urination is not a SEX crime. Again, do you have a cite for such law? Are you sure this is a federal statute? We don't seem to have such a law in Florida which determines if you're peeing in the bushes, along side a highway, but out of sight, that you're a "sex offender." Now, if it's public urination in on the sidewalk in front of a bunch of school children, I can see where that circumstance could and would very well land you in a LOT of trouble.
Extreme wishful thinking on your part. It's how libs roll.
Pot meet-- do I really need to say the rest?
Some libs may some dumb things sometimes, but rarely is it rhetoric. Most of the dumb things that some conservatives say is straight up rhetoric though.
By rhetoric, I mean baseless, substance-less, meaningless words that are just repeated over and over to appeal to emotion/whatever else. At least most libs that say dumb things come up with their own material.
Well, for your answer, I might suggest you look at how libs defend 0bama's 'military' experience when it's pointed out he has none. They get all het up about it.
I don't care what some "libs" on an Internet forum say, as I generally try to base my final judgments on FACTS - not this "I know you are but what am I" kind of childish nonsense.
So, according to the facts and laws, was he (Clinton) considered a military member subject to military laws? Please answer me directly and respectfully, instead of bringing up what the "libs" say or do.
Well, for your answer, I might suggest you look at how libs defend 0bama's 'military' experience when it's pointed out he has none. They get all het up about it.
Do we? I've never even heard of someone claiming he has military experience.
If making up liberal positions and then tearing them down is your idea of a good argument, wow.
I don't care what some "libs" on an Internet forum say, as I generally try to base my final judgments on FACTS - not this "I know you are but what am I" kind of childish nonsense.
So, according to the facts and laws, was he (Clinton) considered a military member subject to military laws? Please answer me directly and respectfully, instead of bringing up what the "libs" say or do.
So you're saying it's a federal law? Do you have a cite? I still find it hard to believe such a things, ESPECIALLY a federal law. State statutes seem to have very specific criteria which have to be met before someone is classified as a sex offender.
Public urination is not a SEX crime. Again, do you have a cite for such law? Are you sure this is a federal statute? We don't seem to have such a law in Florida which determines if you're peeing in the bushes, along side a highway, but out of sight, that you're a "sex offender." Now, if it's public urination in on the sidewalk in front of a bunch of school children, I can see where that circumstance could and would very well land you in a LOT of trouble.
The person in question never said that it was a federal statute. Stop attacking straw men.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
