Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-08-2013, 11:12 AM
 
315 posts, read 256,266 times
Reputation: 135

Advertisements

The logic is that if it saves one child ban mags to 10 rounds. So once you ban them what do you want done with the 10 round mags? Bust them back to 5 round then 1 round? Where does it end if not an out right ban on all guns?

I wish many liberal politicians would just admit that they want all guns banned.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-08-2013, 11:24 AM
 
3,740 posts, read 3,073,028 times
Reputation: 895
Quote:
Originally Posted by sharkhunter View Post
The logic is that if it saves one child ban mags to 10 rounds. So once you ban them what do you want done with the 10 round mags? Bust them back to 5 round then 1 round? Where does it end if not an out right ban on all guns?

I wish many liberal politicians would just admit that they want all guns banned.
That is the history of sword-control, lance control, bow and arrow control, gun-control. It is all about CONTROL (of YOU).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2013, 11:44 AM
 
415 posts, read 764,961 times
Reputation: 547
I could see Looong lines of Criminals getting in single file order to turn them...Ahh what a win this will be...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2013, 11:53 AM
 
Location: Prepperland
19,029 posts, read 14,216,690 times
Reputation: 16752
The one sided argument "if it will save ONE LIFE..." is never answered with "but what if thousands suffer and die for that one life?"
How many disarmed, underarmed, and out of ammo victims have to suffer and die?

How many strong, violent, ruthless thugs will be rewarded by such legislation?
BECAUSE
The ONLY beneficiaries of disarmament, even partial disarmament, are the predators.

So whose side are you really on, when you vote to throw the weak and helpless to the "wolves?"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2013, 12:44 PM
 
Location: Charlotte
602 posts, read 574,512 times
Reputation: 272
Well, as Rep. Diana DeGette (D-CO) says the mags arent a big deal because if they ban them now they will eventually all be used up

She also thought it was cool to tell a senior citizen that was asking her a question that he'd "probably be dead anyway"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2013, 12:45 PM
 
6,137 posts, read 4,863,777 times
Reputation: 1517
We could probably save many more thousands of lives by tossing the 4th amendment.

The "if it saves one life" argument is completely bogus.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2013, 12:48 PM
 
977 posts, read 764,016 times
Reputation: 118
Quote:
Originally Posted by sharkhunter View Post
The logic is that if it saves one child ban mags to 10 rounds. So once you ban them what do you want done with the 10 round mags? Bust them back to 5 round then 1 round? Where does it end if not an out right ban on all guns?

I wish many liberal politicians would just admit that they want all guns banned.
Don't do it Shark. Don't let the *******s get you off message. This is what they do. They incrementally take away your rights if you're not paying attention. Give them nothing. The message is and always will be that people kill. Not guns.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2013, 12:50 PM
 
6,137 posts, read 4,863,777 times
Reputation: 1517
Quote:
Originally Posted by sharkhunter View Post
I wish many liberal politicians would just admit that they want all guns banned.
I wish one liberal would explain where they come down on this. Of course they all love the NY 7 round law, haven't seen one of them argue against it. Surely they'd draw the line at 6 rounds, 5 rounds, 4 rounds... right?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2013, 12:51 PM
 
29,407 posts, read 22,017,439 times
Reputation: 5455
How many lives would banning nine round clips save? All the rest?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2013, 01:37 PM
 
3,740 posts, read 3,073,028 times
Reputation: 895
Quote:
Originally Posted by PolymerMan View Post
Well, as Rep. Diana DeGette (D-CO) says the mags arent a big deal because if they ban them now they will eventually all be used up

She also thought it was cool to tell a senior citizen that was asking her a question that he'd "probably be dead anyway"
How does one use(d) up a magazine. They are reuseable.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:51 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top