Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-18-2013, 12:01 PM
 
Location: Land of Thought and Flow
8,323 posts, read 15,174,301 times
Reputation: 4957

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by mintgum84 View Post
Good.

False advertising is illegal.
Pretty much this.

They weren't forced to pay out because their chicken was prepared according to Islamic Law. They were forced to pay out because they falsely advertised their product.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-18-2013, 12:03 PM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,956,603 times
Reputation: 5661
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mathguy View Post
Your thread title is wrong.

In fact, you usually screw it up with stuff you have an agenda about.

"Ted Kazynski arrested for mailing packages" would be right up your alley.
You are on the ball.

First, McDonald's wasn't "forced" it was a mutual agreement.
Second, the McDonald's restaurant claimed their chicken was prepared according to Islamic law and it wasn't. Seems open and shut to me.

If a restaurant advertised it was kosher and it was not, guests would be entitled to sue.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-18-2013, 12:04 PM
 
Location: North America
19,784 posts, read 15,119,250 times
Reputation: 8527
Quote:
Originally Posted by gallowsCalibrator View Post
Pretty much this.

They weren't forced to pay out because their chicken was prepared according to Islamic Law. They were forced to pay out because they falsely advertised their product.

You know you're just confusing the islamophobes, right?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-18-2013, 12:09 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,135,461 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by no1brownsfan View Post
Anyone who is smart enough knows that McDonald's has it's own brand. In knowing this, why wouldn't he look for a restaurant that may provide this option? If I'm McDonald's Corp, I'd fight this tooth and nail!
Well if McDonalds advertised it, then they clearly are wrong..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-18-2013, 12:11 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,135,461 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by gallowsCalibrator View Post
Pretty much this.

They weren't forced to pay out because their chicken was prepared according to Islamic Law. They were forced to pay out because they falsely advertised their product.
I'm unaware of laws in this country which mandates truth in advertising...

We dont live in Canada where they exist..

And for the record, McDonalds was wrong, but there is no truth in advertising in america, leading your synopsis completely false.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-18-2013, 12:13 PM
 
Location: NJ/NY
10,655 posts, read 18,668,752 times
Reputation: 2829
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
I'm unaware of laws in this country which mandates truth in advertising...

We dont live in Canada where they exist..

And for the record, McDonalds was wrong, but there is no truth in advertising in america, leading your synopsis completely false.
They can be sued for damages for it in civil court (and were)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_a...ng_regulations

Quote:
Advertising is regulated by the authority of the Federal Trade Commission, a United States administrative agency, to prohibit "unfair and deceptive acts or practices in commerce."[13] While it makes laymen's sense to assume that being deceptive is being unfair, deceptiveness in practice has been treated separately by the FTC, leaving unfairness to refer only to other types.[14] All commercial acts may be deceptive, not just advertising, but noncommercial activity such as advertising for political candidates is not subject to prosecution under the FTC Act. The 50 states have similar statutes, which generally are very similar to that of the FTC and in many cases copied so closely that they are known as "Little FTC Acts." While the terms "false" and "deceptive" are essentially the same for most, being deceptive is not the same as producing deception. What is illegal is the potential to deceive, which is interpreted to occur when consumers see the advertising to be stating to them, explicitly or implicitly, a claim that they may not realize is false and material. The latter means that the claim, if relied on for making a purchasing decision, is likely to be harmful by adversely affecting that decision. If an ad is implicitly false, evidence must be obtained for what consumers saw the ad saying, and for the materiality of that, and for the true facts about the advertised item, but no evidence is required that actual deception occurred, or that reliance occurred, or that the advertiser intended to deceive or knew that the claim was false.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-18-2013, 12:13 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,135,461 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by mintgum84 View Post
Good.

False advertising is illegal.
So when the local hotdog show advertises, "World famous hotdogs", they are breaking the law?

What law would that be?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-18-2013, 12:14 PM
 
78,437 posts, read 60,640,522 times
Reputation: 49743
Let's see, what are some other titles the OP would create.....

"Geoffrey Dahmer arrested for not using Heinz Ketchup. John Kerry grows his police state."

"JFK ducks while riding in Texas parade, exposing his wife to gunfire."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-18-2013, 12:14 PM
 
Location: My beloved Bluegrass
20,126 posts, read 16,170,612 times
Reputation: 28335
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cnote11 View Post
You obviously do not know anything about Dearborn. It is a city with one of the highest populations of Arabs in the United States. McDonald's is obviously trying to cash in on the demographic and in doing so they falsely advertised that their sandwiches made at this branch were to the Islamic standard (Halal). Except this wasn't true, hence why they were sued and the Muslim community of Dearborn won the case.
The correct thing happened.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-18-2013, 12:15 PM
 
Location: Staten Island, NY
6,476 posts, read 7,326,616 times
Reputation: 7026
Quote:
Originally Posted by gallowsCalibrator View Post
Pretty much this.

They weren't forced to pay out because their chicken was prepared according to Islamic Law. They were forced to pay out because they falsely advertised their product.
Bingo!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:38 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top