Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 04-19-2013, 08:23 AM
 
2,682 posts, read 4,481,853 times
Reputation: 1343

Advertisements

I've read the comments on some other threads and the only questions I have is for those that strongly oppose SSM, what is your biggest reason as to why? I'm trying to figure out from the comments, but aside from religion, none of the other arguments make any sense. And the religious argument doesn't make sense either, not everyone is religious and it's not fair to impose one's beliefs on everyone else.

Here is my stance. I am not religious, I am gay, I would like to marry my GF but mostly for the tax and other benefits (not that we would break up otherwise, but I just don't need a piece of paper to prove anything, but I would like for her to have legal standing in the case that something happens to me). I would be OK with just a civil union recognized by the federal government. We wouldn't get married in a church anyway. I do understand that some gays are religious and would like to be "married." Also, if we allow straights to marry but gays to only have a civil union it is blatant descrimination and opens up the door to more descrimination. So, as much as people say "why don't gays just be OK with a civil union" they just don't understand that we would still be separate from everyone else and this would cause some people to feel like second class citizens. And the argument that gays already do have all the rights to marriage is asinine - we don't have the right to marry the person that we love. Would those of you that feel this way tell your gay friend/family member to go marry someone they don't love because they can? Or do all of you live in Mississippi.

So as much as I would like to urge the gay community to just forgo the "marriage" and settle for a civil union so we can get this matter cleared up faster, I can't.

But, I am interested to hear from those completely oppposed, why they are so opposed. Don't say things like gays already can get married, but tell me why you think your argument has any merit - as I mentioned above, we have the right to marry someone we don't love and if you use this argument, you are saying that is OK. Is it OK? Why?

 
Old 04-19-2013, 08:26 AM
 
Location: Central Ohio
10,834 posts, read 14,940,293 times
Reputation: 16587
Marriage is between a man and a woman.
 
Old 04-19-2013, 08:27 AM
 
Location: Dublin, CA
3,807 posts, read 4,277,042 times
Reputation: 3984
Uh, what is SSM???
 
Old 04-19-2013, 08:28 AM
 
1,350 posts, read 2,300,978 times
Reputation: 960
People need to get the bleep out of their people's lives.

And your interpretation of Bible is a book for you, you don't force that on the rest of America.
 
Old 04-19-2013, 08:29 AM
 
2,682 posts, read 4,481,853 times
Reputation: 1343
Quote:
Originally Posted by nicet4 View Post
Marriage is between a man and a woman.
OK, but as a species we evolve...why can't the definition be changed?
 
Old 04-19-2013, 08:29 AM
 
14,292 posts, read 9,682,360 times
Reputation: 4254
Because SSM is fundamentally different from traditional marriage.
 
Old 04-19-2013, 08:30 AM
 
25,849 posts, read 16,537,070 times
Reputation: 16027
I also oppose cats in the house.
 
Old 04-19-2013, 08:31 AM
 
14,292 posts, read 9,682,360 times
Reputation: 4254
Quote:
Originally Posted by katestar View Post
OK, but as a species we evolve...why can't the definition be changed?
It's not the definition, is the fundamental purpose and function behind marriage that people are trying to change.
 
Old 04-19-2013, 08:32 AM
 
2,682 posts, read 4,481,853 times
Reputation: 1343
Quote:
Originally Posted by OICU812 View Post
Because SSM is fundamentally different from traditional marriage.
According to whom?
 
Old 04-19-2013, 08:32 AM
 
Location: Middle of nowhere
24,260 posts, read 14,214,925 times
Reputation: 9895
Quote:
Originally Posted by OICU812 View Post
Because SSM is fundamentally different from traditional marriage.
How so?

The only difference I see is the genitalia of the people involved.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:04 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top