Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
In 1776 the average man in colonial America could own the same gun that a soldier in the army carried.
What has changed between then and now that don't have that right? It seems to be clearly spelled out in the 2nd Ammendment.
Keep in mind too, that in the only case to directly address the 2nd amendment (US v. Miller), the Supreme Court ruled that the reason Miller's shotgun was NOT protected by the 2nd amendment, was because it was NOT similar to weapons used in the military!
So the liberals with their incessant "assault weapons bans" are repeatedly violating, not just the 2nd amendment, but also the Supreme Court's clear ruling.
I don't think any reasonable person wants to deny you the ability to have a weapon or weapons in your home to defend your family if need be.
I think you're wrong. By trying to ban certain guns they great;y reduce the ability of some people to defend themselves. People of limited physical strength have fewer options for effective gun choices.
Didn't Adam Lanza's mother have a bunch of guns to protect her?
And your point is?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
