Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Are you willing to give up some constitutional rights to feel safe?
I would rather not have any security checks at airports and take my chances on the flight. 64 68.09%
I would be willing to submit to a search without probable cause so that my fight will be safer. 30 31.91%
Voters: 94. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-21-2013, 11:14 AM
 
Location: Midwest
38,496 posts, read 25,835,417 times
Reputation: 10789

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
No. The Constitution text says UNREASONABLE search. Pretty much everyone agrees the airport security is a reasonable search, not to mention it is also voluntary. You do not have to go to an airport. Do you really think we should allow people with guns and bombs into planes given the fact that such idiocy has already cost the lives of thousands of people. If you don't like it, then don't fly.
For a search to be "unreasonable," there must be lack of probable cause.

Quote:
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
So the question is; what is considered "probable cause?"

Quote:
A common definition is "a reasonable amount of suspicion, supported by circumstances sufficiently strong to justify a prudent and cautious person's belief that certain facts are probably true."
Probable cause - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Do you think that when you fly, there is reasonable suspicion that you are probably carrying a weapon to carry out a crime on the airplane?

Last edited by jojajn; 04-21-2013 at 11:22 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-21-2013, 11:14 AM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,088,210 times
Reputation: 3954
Where in the Constitution do we find the right to fly?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-21-2013, 11:14 AM
 
11,768 posts, read 10,269,301 times
Reputation: 3444
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay F View Post
Racial (and religious) profiling would be a lot more effective to stop terrorism than having the TSA throw away an innocent person's tube of toothpaste.
Or breast milk.

Quote:
Originally Posted by billydaman View Post
So Muslims and non-whites are the only people worthy of checking for nefarious intent? Do you not understand how prejudicial your comments come off as?
A 90 year old woman sure isn't worth searching.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-21-2013, 11:15 AM
 
11,768 posts, read 10,269,301 times
Reputation: 3444
Quote:
Originally Posted by HistorianDude View Post
Where in the Constitution do we find the right to fly?
We have a right to travel, but not necessarily to fly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-21-2013, 11:15 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,668,310 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by desertdetroiter View Post
I'm not willing to give up or compromise even one tiny bit if freedom in exchange for safety. I want the country to remain as free and open as it was intended to be.

If that means I get blown the hell up, then too bad for me. I'm not gonna live forever anyway. But I wanna die in a free America.
It is not just you, because about 300 other people would have to die with you. The society cannot sacrifice that many innocent lives just to appease your sensitivities.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-21-2013, 11:16 AM
 
14,917 posts, read 13,109,537 times
Reputation: 4828
I am absolutely willing to sacrifice freedom for safety. That's why I support congressional republicans who want to deny Dzhokhar Tsarnaev his constitutional rights by declaring him an enemy combatant.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-21-2013, 11:17 AM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,088,210 times
Reputation: 3954
Quote:
Originally Posted by lycos679 View Post
We have a right to travel, but not necessarily to fly.
Exactly.

Further, let's pretend we do have a right to fly. I would suggest that my right to fly must be balanced against your right to not be blown out of the sky by a bomb in my underwear.

Maybe?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-21-2013, 11:18 AM
 
Location: Florida
23,175 posts, read 26,214,723 times
Reputation: 27919
Like the practice of not paying kidnappers....ever....locked cockpits and the known practice of never giving in to highjackers....there would be little need for anything other than minimal security checks at airports
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-21-2013, 11:19 AM
 
Location: Midwest
38,496 posts, read 25,835,417 times
Reputation: 10789
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
No. The Constitution text says UNREASONABLE search. Pretty much everyone agrees the airport security is a reasonable search, not to mention it is also voluntary. You do not have to go to an airport. Do you really think we should allow people with guns and bombs into planes given the fact that such idiocy has already cost the lives of thousands of people. If you don't like it, then don't fly.
Therefore, we can put you on the record as choosing safety over liberty.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-21-2013, 11:20 AM
 
Location: A great city, by a Great Lake!
15,896 posts, read 11,996,826 times
Reputation: 7502
Quote:
Originally Posted by monkeywrenching View Post
that is why I drive instead of flying. I also tell the TSA vipr teams to get lost too.
the security checks at airports wont get any better until more people drive and less fly.
when the airlines really feel it in their pocketbook, then the TSA will end up going away, not until that happens will it change.
Given that I currently have no desire to travel overseas and there is more of this vast country that I want to see, I too would rather drive. That is all we did when going on vacation as a child, and so I've seen or passed through about 17 states. Besides, half the fun is getting there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top