Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You can no longer protect and side with the communist, he is going down, and this time not just on his boy toys. He is and always has been, corrupt, an liar, and incompetent. His luck has run out. You better jump ship while you can because you who allowed him to get re-elected are now all seeing the truth and you are looking very foolish for protecting the commie. I hope they hang him at high noon in the public square. He is wasting the oxygen of good Americans. The sooner he is under the turf the better for us .. Love him while you can, if you refuse to see the truth...
Surrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrre Donn.
And Romney is going to win.
Personally, I hope they arrest you and lock you up forever for your treasonous statement.
Fail! Obama requested much more money for emabasy security than the GOP led House gave him. Obviously after we killed Bin Laden, there would be a uproar from those who followed him. That is just common sense.
Besides, I never heard Obama say, "Mission Accomplished!"
Cover up of what, lack of needed security because of funding cutbacks by the GOP led House?
Remember, Obama requested much more funding for embassy security.
In Obama's campaign speeches President Obama kept at it, saying that "al Qaeda is on its heels and Osama bin Laden is no more." The second half of the sentence is true. But the more we learn about what happened in Benghazi, the more the first sounds like fantasy, and the less Americans can trust this White House to tell them the truth.
In Obama's campaign speeches President Obama kept at it, saying that "al Qaeda is on its heels and Osama bin Laden is no more." The second half of the sentence is true. But the more we learn about what happened in Benghazi, the more the first sounds like fantasy, and the less Americans can trust this White House to tell them the truth.
Even as the White House strove last week to move beyond questions about the Benghazi attacks of Tuesday, September 11, 2012, fresh evidence emerged that senior Obama administration officials knowingly misled the country about what had happened in the days following the assaults.
The Weekly Standard has obtained a timeline briefed by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence detailing the heavy substantive revisions made to the CIA’s talking points, just six weeks before the 2012 presidential election, and additional information about why the changes were made and by whom.
What I find interesting about the "Benghazi Talking Points" as published in the Weekly Standard is how closely Susan Rice's comments on the 9/16/12 Sunday talk shows align with the original version 1 pre-edited CIA talking points.
From the CIA version 1:
-Spontaneous, inspired by the Cairo protests [which btw were at least in part inspired by the video].
-Mix crowd from many sectors of Libyan society.
-Islamic extremists in crowd with ties to Al-Qaeda in the crowd.
-Availability of heavy weapons in Libya contributed to the attack.
Susan Rice on "Face the Nation." But based on the best information we have to date, what our assessment is as of the present is in fact what began spontaneously in Benghazi as a reaction to what had transpired some hours earlier in Cairo where, of course, as you know, there was a violent protest outside of our embassy– –sparked by this hateful video. But soon after that spontaneous protest began outside of our consulate in Benghazi, we believe that it looks like extremist elements, individuals, joined in that– in that effort with heavy weapons of the sort that are, unfortunately, readily now available in Libya post-revolution. And that it spun from there into something much, much more violent.
Everything Obama says is a lot of bull to your side.
Have you noticed how Obama is staying silent? This is because he's smart. One thing Obama has done quite well over the years is provided conservatives rope, and why not? The GOP has been more than willing to hang themselves with it over and over again.
Washington Times, Jennifer Rubin from the Post, Sean Hannity and Rush do not a controversy make. They do, however detract from the investigation for when they open their mouths or write, more than half the country sits there and shakes their head.
Going on and on about funding or lack of is nothing but deflection.
Should Obama have paid for increased security at the Benghazi consulate himself?
I am guessing the GOP led witch hunt will come to an abrupt end when it ends with themselves to blame.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
