Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
An allergic reaction to cigarettes is not being "easilly offended by most odors." But I get it, it's far easier to make stuff up then to respond to what someone actually said.
You could always get a job that doesn't hire smokers and all your little problems will be solved.
Please use some deodorant, you have BO really bad.
The Govt should pass some more laws against these bad smells.
and don't forget garlic and onions. No one should eat them if they have to go back to work. I use to work with a guy that smelled like that all the time.
and don't forget garlic and onions. No one should eat them if they have to go back to work. I use to work with a guy that smelled like that all the time.
These smells aren't filled with poisonous agents. Plus food is part of a necessary human function: eating.
When I was in the military, our company spent a great deal of time picking up cigarette butts on base. I grew to detest the job so much that I vowed never to put a cigarette butt on the ground again. That was 41 years ago, and to this day I still field strip my cigarette butts and keep the filter in my pocket if I cannot dispose of it properly at the time.
I support smokers rights. I support everyone rights. The people who don't support people's rights are the smokers who fill the air people are breathing with their toxic, carcinogenic stench, and the ground with their roaches.
Yes, the true disrespectors of rights in this debate are the smokers, who feel that they are the ONLY one with rights.
A vile, disgusting, rotten bunch of SOBs if ever there were any.
So let me ask you something, Mr or Ms. Tolerant, how do you feel about someone who reeks of marijuana? Is that okay with you Or are they a MORE "vile, disgusting, rotten bunch of SOs" than cigarette smokers?
I'm assuming most of the pro-smoking posts are by smokers. Could be wrong. If so though, I didn't realize this many people still smoked nowadays. Older folks still do but judging by this thread I feel like it's 1927 when people smoked cuz tobacco companies said they cured ailments.
So let me ask you something, Mr or Ms. Tolerant, how do you feel about someone who reeks of marijuana? Is that okay with you Or are they a MORE "vile, disgusting, rotten bunch of SOs" than cigarette smokers?
2nd hand pot smoke and its lingering effects have been shown in studies to cause health issues for non users. There are far less studies out on this though.
In any event, all smoking where a carcinogenic is released should be done in private to protect the rights of all.
Location: Somewhere gray and damp, close to the West Coast
20,955 posts, read 5,546,892 times
Reputation: 8559
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robin Rossi
I support smokers rights. I support everyone rights. The people who don't support people's rights are the smokers who fill the air people are breathing with their toxic, carcinogenic stench, and the ground with their roaches.
Yes, the true disrespectors of rights in this debate are the smokers, who feel that they are the ONLY one with rights.
A vile, disgusting, rotten bunch of SOBs if ever there were any.
Feel better now for spewing a little?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
