Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-02-2013, 10:17 PM
 
Location: Portland, OR
8,802 posts, read 8,899,643 times
Reputation: 4512

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Winter_Sucks View Post
Did Reid say the law would be train wreck as is or a train wreck if not properly funded?
He said it would be a trainwreck if it's not properly funded, aka it's going to be a trainwreck because the GOP will make SURE it doesn't get a dime.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-02-2013, 10:27 PM
Status: "everybody getting reported now.." (set 24 days ago)
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,558 posts, read 16,548,014 times
Reputation: 6041
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
I dont support Romneycare either, but at least that was self funded and didnt cost trillions of dollars, and it didnt raise taxes, and isnt mandated on the citizens.

Oh thats right, you think their the same cause Obama said so.. yeah, I'm laughing at you again.

edit: Oh and I forgot, Romneycare actually increased the number of insured individuals, while Obamacare is supposed to lower it.. and STILL cost $1T+..

Yeah, you high 5 failure all the time
You must be talking about yourself in the bold.

There is the argument, that under Obamacare, about 1 million people will be kicked off their health insurance. Even if that was true, the provisions in Obamacare added 30 million people just last year alone.

30 -1 = + 29

the same inability to count seems to also follow you when it comes to cost. 1.1 trillion dollars is the cost of Obamacare to the system, but the old system cost 2.8 trillion.

2.8 -1.1 = 1.7 trillion dollars less the government is spending on healthcare.(over 10 years i believe).

by the way, the same people who wrote Romneycare, helped to write Obamacare, and in his own words

http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/20...ey-adviser.php

"its the same F#^@5#$2 Bill"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-02-2013, 10:28 PM
Status: "everybody getting reported now.." (set 24 days ago)
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,558 posts, read 16,548,014 times
Reputation: 6041
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
Why would you get on a train destined to wreck?
Why are you ok with some purposefully trying to wreck a train ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-02-2013, 10:30 PM
Status: "everybody getting reported now.." (set 24 days ago)
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,558 posts, read 16,548,014 times
Reputation: 6041
Quote:
Originally Posted by ALackOfCreativity View Post
This is wrong, the real reason is a lot more technical but I will try to explain.........
How is it wrong if that is what the CBO said in its report? If you want to claim there is more to it than that, then fine, but the CBO did give it as a reason.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2013, 12:11 AM
 
Location: somewhere in the woods
16,880 posts, read 15,201,197 times
Reputation: 5240
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marc Paolella View Post
Reid: Obamacare could be "train wreck" without more money - CBS News

It is going to be a disaster. Rationed medicine, doctor shortages, shut down of drug research, European medical mediocracy run amok. Y'all asked for it, and now you are going to get it. And y'all deserve it. For being stupid.


get rid of it before it becomes a real trainwreck.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2013, 12:52 AM
 
Location: Chesapeake Bay
6,046 posts, read 4,818,446 times
Reputation: 3544
And what do you propose to replace it with?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2013, 05:21 AM
 
46,289 posts, read 27,108,503 times
Reputation: 11129
Quote:
Originally Posted by crbcrbrgv View Post
I won't deflect. It hasn't been a disaster yet. Prove that it has been, please.

My insurance went up 9 percent this year due to "Obamacare".

No reason was ever given all those years it went up 10-13 a year.
Because it is not fully implimented, and yes righties on this board have discussed why insurance has gone up over the last 10 years, it's a natural cycle. We fully understand that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2013, 05:29 AM
 
46,289 posts, read 27,108,503 times
Reputation: 11129
Quote:
Originally Posted by crbcrbrgv View Post
I won't deflect. It hasn't been a disaster yet. Prove that it has been, please.

My insurance went up 9 percent this year due to "Obamacare".

No reason was ever given all those years it went up 10-13 a year.
However, lets everyone get past the petty BS that people are slinging....both left and right...

It was sold to Americans as going to lower your insurance by 3000% (or somthing like that), now, you can say it however you want to say it, but most people will believe that there insurance is going to go down by 3000%. No matter how you look at it. You can come with all the fancy names and provide all the fancy graphs you want, but most Americans won't/can't understand that.

Hell in an ABC poll 42% of Americans did not kow it was even law...

‘Obamacare’ Poll Finds 42% of Americans Unaware It’s Law - ABC News

So you people on the left, you can sit here and BS with yourself and some of you may know it better than others, but most of the people don't have a clue what is about to happen.

Now, you take 2 of the largest promoters of the bill and they are saying it's going to be a train wreck, what the hell are Americans supposed to think? Yea, you say well it's funding, most Americas were told it would not cost more than 1 trillion, most Americans won't/can't understand that...all they know now it is a train wreck...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2013, 05:36 AM
 
11,337 posts, read 11,043,693 times
Reputation: 14993
Harry Reid is not to blame. Obama is not to blame. The American People are to blame. They are the ones who elected and supported collectivistic politicians who think socialized European-style medical rationing is the answer to the problem of health care that is already overpriced because of government involvement and control.

The American People voted on self-destruction, and they are going to get exactly that.

"You're waiting for a train, a train that will take you far away. You know where you hope this train will take you, but you don't know for sure. But it doesn't matter." -Inception

"Train wreck" does not begin to describe what we are about to see as we take the finest health care system in the world and metaphorically send two airliners into it and watch it explode and burn and come crashing to the ground.

And when it doesn't work, and when you can't get a procedure before your are dead, and when you can't find a decent doctor, and when Capitalist drug companies stop taking risks because there is no payoff, you will all be screaming in protest. How did this happen?! Why can't I just have what I need?!

You think need is a basis for stealing from one to give to another? Well fine. Now you reap the rewards!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2013, 05:38 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,118,301 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251 View Post
You must be talking about yourself in the bold.

There is the argument, that under Obamacare, about 1 million people will be kicked off their health insurance. Even if that was true, the provisions in Obamacare added 30 million people just last year alone.
Thats just utter bull crap. There wasnt even 30 million people without insurance.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251 View Post
the same inability to count seems to also follow you when it comes to cost. 1.1 trillion dollars is the cost of Obamacare to the system, but the old system cost 2.8 trillion.

2.8 -1.1 = 1.7 trillion dollars less the government is spending on healthcare.(over 10 years i believe).
You are wrong again. The Obamacare cost, is in ADDITION to what was formerly being spent. In fact recent GAO estimates that Obamacare will add $6 TRILLION, (yes thats TRILLION) to the national debt
Shocking Report: Obamacare Adds $6.2 Trillion to Long-Term Deficit | Independent Journal Review
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251 View Post
by the way, the same people who wrote Romneycare, helped to write Obamacare, and in his own words

http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/11/obamacare-romneycare-are-the-same-****ing-bill-says-former-romney-adviser.php

"its the same F#^@5#$2 Bill"
Romney said he wasnt called, and the founders of that plan was Newt Gingrich, who also said they werent called. ONE person being consulted on a "committee", doesnt even come close to "the same people".. Obamacare is over 10,000 pages long, how longs Romneycare?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:27 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top