Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 06-26-2013, 04:56 PM
 
Location: Old Bellevue, WA
18,782 posts, read 17,369,310 times
Reputation: 7990

Advertisements

There's furious effort by the left to recast the public image of Pres. Ronald Reagan. This April, 2013 column by lefty pundit David Sirota typifies it.

The Reagan Revolution is over - Salon.com

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sirota
Reagan today looks like an admirable moderate in comparison to the wildly unpopular fringe conservative elements that run today’s GOP.
It's no secret why the left wants this recasting. Reagan is probably now the most popular ex-prez of the past century. Sirota himself quotes a poll that found Reagan would beat Obama in almost every age, income, gender, and ethnic group.

I just finished reading "The Age of Reagan" by Steven F. Hayward (very good book, btw). If you read it, a very different picture emerges than the revisionism we're getting from the left. Here are 5 things that these lefties have forgotten, and would doubtless like everyone else to forget as well.

1) Reagan in 1980 inherited a GOP that was centrist-left. This meant that Reagan had to bring in many 'Nixon-Ford retreads' because there weren't enough "movement conservatives with sufficient expertise or experience for appointment to senior positions" (Hayes, p. 42). Thus Reagan brought in people like Richard Darman, George Shultz, James Baker, and GHW Bush, were decidedly not true believer conservatives. This was ok with Reagan, anyway. He wanted a WH that could engage in heated internal debate, and test all ideas by fire.

2)In the same vein Reagan faced opposition to proposed tax cuts not just from Tip O'Neil and the Democrats, but from his own party. When the Kemp-Roth tax cut proposal was killed in 1981, it died not at the hands of dems, but by Senate Budget Committee chair Pete Domenici (R, AZ) and Finance committee chair Bob Dole (R, KS).

3)Reagan had to go against the grain for all 8 years of his presidency. Steve Hayes opens his book with an account of the "tear down this wall, Mr. Gorbachev" speech.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hayes
"Virtually the entire foreign policy apparatus of the U.S. government...tried to stop Ronald Reagan from saying 'Tear down this wall'....The State Department and the NSC persisted up to the last minute trying to derail it.
A similar story happened surrounding the 'evil empire' speech, and the whole idea of SDI. In every case Reagan was virtually a lone voice, and in every case he was vindicated by history.

4)Ronald Reagan had to deal with a Democrat-controlled house for all 8 of his years. In spite of that, he did achieve one remarkable result. Economist Stephen Slivinski, calculated 'Real annual growth rate of federal spending, minus defense, homeland security, and entitlements,' for presidents from LBJ to W Bush. Under Reagan, there was actually a 1.4% reduction in federal spending, thus stipulated. There was positive growth in spending under all the others. The biggest number was a 6.4% increase, under Nixon/Ford.

5)Reagan redefined/transformed the national discourse. In 1976, Reagan had to fend off attacks that he was an 'arch-conservative,' 'ultra-conservative,' etc. By 1988, as Hayes recounts, Dems were running away from liberalism like Tirunesh Dibaba in the Olympics 5000 meter race.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hayes
The L-word, as it came to be called, was for all practical purposes banned at the [dem] convention podium. An aide to Senator Bentsen [D, TX] admitted as much, telling Fred Barnes that "Democrats have finally learned that you can be a liberal, but you can't say you're a liberal."
And Bill Schneider of CNN said in 1988, "Why as liberalism become such a scare word? The reason is that Reagan has changed the shape of American politics."

The idea that Reagan was a moderate, would be a moderate by today's standards, and was anything less than a true believer ideologue for individualism, is absurd. He was a persuaded right wing, individualist, pro-liberty believer, and that is his legacy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-26-2013, 05:33 PM
 
Location: Wasilla, Alaska
17,823 posts, read 23,462,250 times
Reputation: 6541
Well said. I voted for Reagan, both times, and I remember very well how the liberal freaks labeled him as an ultra-conservative that was destined to start WW III during the 1980 election.

I disagree with Bill Schneider's comment. Liberalism became a "scare word" during the 1960s under LBJ and the irresponsible tax and spend warmongering policies of the Democrats. Nixon beat Humphrey, and Wallace, in 1968 primarily on the promise that he would end the Vietnam war.

It should also be noted that Reagan and Tip O'Neil worked out a deal that would allow Democrats to increase spending on social programs, while giving Reagan the increases in defense spending that he wanted. That is why the National Debt increased by $3 trillion during Reagan's two terms.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2013, 06:31 PM
 
11,086 posts, read 8,549,057 times
Reputation: 6392
Leftists hate Reagan because he brought down the Soviet Union.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2013, 06:33 PM
 
Location: Austin
295 posts, read 359,035 times
Reputation: 345
Reagan wouldn't even win the nomination of the modern GOP.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2013, 06:51 PM
 
29,939 posts, read 39,477,016 times
Reputation: 4799
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marshall Gibson LP View Post
Reagan wouldn't even win the nomination of the modern GOP.
Don't hurt yourself with all that deep thought going on over there!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2013, 06:51 PM
 
Location: #
9,598 posts, read 16,571,410 times
Reputation: 6324
I'm a liberal, and I am 100 percent for anyone and everyone remembering everything about Ronald Reagan.

Take that however you may.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2013, 06:57 PM
 
Location: Portland, OR
8,802 posts, read 8,902,028 times
Reputation: 4512
Quote:
Originally Posted by crbcrbrgv View Post
I'm a liberal, and I am 100 percent for anyone and everyone remembering everything about Ronald Reagan.

Take that however you may.
What a robust analysis
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2013, 10:22 PM
 
Location: Old Bellevue, WA
18,782 posts, read 17,369,310 times
Reputation: 7990
Quote:
Originally Posted by crbcrbrgv View Post
I'm a liberal, and I am 100 percent for anyone and everyone remembering everything about Ronald Reagan.

Take that however you may.
ok. I'll take it as meaning that you're in 100% agreement with me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2013, 10:26 PM
 
Location: Deep Dirty South
5,189 posts, read 5,338,397 times
Reputation: 3863
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goinback2011 View Post
Leftists hate Reagan because he brought down the Soviet Union.
Oh yes, who can ever forget that heroic image of Saint Reagan waving his magic wand and single-handedly destroying the Soviet Union.

Were you even alive for these events?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marshall Gibson LP View Post
Reagan wouldn't even win the nomination of the modern GOP.
Seriously. His tax structure alone would have him branded as a leftist pinko socialist by the current Republican Party, even if he had an R after his name. They would have called him a RINO.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:01 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top