Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-21-2013, 12:24 PM
 
79,914 posts, read 44,174,531 times
Reputation: 17209

Advertisements

He will be out way before then. He is eligible for parole in around 5 years as I understand it. (8 years with time already served).

When the many lawsuits make it through the courts showing how many unconstitutional activities the government has been involved in get ruled on there will be no will to keep him in prison.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-21-2013, 12:24 PM
 
13,511 posts, read 19,272,815 times
Reputation: 16580
Quote:
Originally Posted by Workin_Hard View Post
Not long enough, and he certainly deserves to be locked up for every day of that time. If he were to get out in 10 years, that would amount to nothing more than a slap on his limp wrist for what he did.
I'd sure love to hear what you feel "he did".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2013, 12:32 PM
 
Location: South Portland, ME
893 posts, read 1,206,917 times
Reputation: 902
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
That sounds about right. The sentence had to be harsh enough to remind people of the seriousness of such crimes.

And what crime exactly did he commit? Alerting everyone that OTHER PEOPLE were committing crimes.

So it's a crime to report a crime? But it's not a crime to commit the original crime that got reported. Got it... great logic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2013, 12:34 PM
 
Location: South Portland, ME
893 posts, read 1,206,917 times
Reputation: 902
Quote:
Originally Posted by kidkaos2 View Post
I don't know whether you mean wow as in not enough or wow as in too much.

Personally I don't believe he ever deserves to be a free man again. Whistle blowers release information about criminal activity. He isn't a whistle blower. He released thousands of documents that served no legitimate purpose to be leaked.
He showed us a video of pilots shooting at innocent/unarmed reporters... how is that not "whistle blowing"?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2013, 12:51 PM
 
Location: San Francisco, CA
15,088 posts, read 13,445,686 times
Reputation: 14266
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoulesMSU View Post
He showed us a video of pilots shooting at innocent/unarmed reporters... how is that not "whistle blowing"?
Here's the difference:

If Bradley Manning had released only those select classified documents that blew the whistle on unethical activity, he might have been a hero with justice on his side.

Instead, Bradley Manning chose to dump over 700,000 classified documents out on the internet for anyone to go through, most of which he surely didn't know the possible implications of.

That's not heroic, patriotic activity; it's reckless disregard for the sworn secrecy that is obviously critical to the function of any military / intelligence organization.

We can't just condone people with access to top intelligence just dumping troves of intel out on the internet anytime they get a bee in their bonnet, and that's why he got what he deserved.

Quote:
Originally Posted by purehuman View Post
So if they "served no legitimate purpose to be leaked"....why is he in jail?..also who would decide if they were "legitimate" to be "leaked"?...Pretty sad when people don't want to know the truth, and society punishes or outright kills those who do...
He means there was no legit purpose for leaking them, not that the documents had no legit purpose. Obviously, intelligence orgs are the ones who decide what is and is not classified. It is sheer lunacy to think that you can live safely in the modern world under a model where there is no military / national intelligence and everything is open to the public. Do you really think we can just put all our missile launch codes, SEAL team member names, and aircraft carrier destination orders online for everyone to stare at?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2013, 01:33 PM
 
79,914 posts, read 44,174,531 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by ambient View Post
He means there was no legit purpose for leaking them, not that the documents had no legit purpose. Obviously, intelligence orgs are the ones who decide what is and is not classified. It is sheer lunacy to think that you can live safely in the modern world under a model where there is no military / national intelligence and everything is open to the public. Do you really think we can just put all our missile launch codes, SEAL team member names, and aircraft carrier destination orders online for everyone to stare at?
America: Do you spy on us?

Government: No, we do not.

Washington Post: According to our research you do.

Government: Well, O.K. but not on purpose.

Washington Post: you've been caught misleading judges and running counter to the laws over and over according to the record.

Government: Vacation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2013, 01:34 PM
 
Location: SW MO
23,593 posts, read 37,466,118 times
Reputation: 29337
Quote:
Originally Posted by ambient View Post
Here's the difference:

If Bradley Manning had released only those select classified documents that blew the whistle on unethical activity, he might have been a hero with justice on his side.

Instead, Bradley Manning chose to dump over 700,000 classified documents out on the internet for anyone to go through, most of which he surely didn't know the possible implications of.

That's not heroic, patriotic activity; it's reckless disregard for the sworn secrecy that is obviously critical to the function of any military / intelligence organization.

We can't just condone people with access to top intelligence just dumping troves of intel out on the internet anytime they get a bee in their bonnet, and that's why he got what he deserved.


He means there was no legit purpose for leaking them, not that the documents had no legit purpose. Obviously, intelligence orgs are the ones who decide what is and is not classified. It is sheer lunacy to think that you can live safely in the modern world under a model where there is no military / national intelligence and everything is open to the public. Do you really think we can just put all our missile launch codes, SEAL team member names, and aircraft carrier destination orders online for everyone to stare at?
Now cut that out! You're making sense. Clearly you have an unfair advantage over Manning's supporters. You possess critical thinking skills.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2013, 01:47 PM
 
5,261 posts, read 4,154,407 times
Reputation: 2264
Quote:
Originally Posted by ambient View Post
Here's the difference:

If Bradley Manning had released only those select classified documents that blew the whistle on unethical activity, he might have been a hero with justice on his side.

Instead, Bradley Manning chose to dump over 700,000 classified documents out on the internet for anyone to go through, most of which he surely didn't know the possible implications of.

That's not heroic, patriotic activity; it's reckless disregard for the sworn secrecy that is obviously critical to the function of any military / intelligence organization.

We can't just condone people with access to top intelligence just dumping troves of intel out on the internet anytime they get a bee in their bonnet, and that's why he got what he deserved.


He means there was no legit purpose for leaking them, not that the documents had no legit purpose. Obviously, intelligence orgs are the ones who decide what is and is not classified. It is sheer lunacy to think that you can live safely in the modern world under a model where there is no military / national intelligence and everything is open to the public. Do you really think we can just put all our missile launch codes, SEAL team member names, and aircraft carrier destination orders online for everyone to stare at?
Who has said that the state should be allowed no ability to conduct covert operations, must reveal everything to the public or have no military. I must have missed that. More than anything, I think it was dumb to release everything, because it allows the fascists to obscure the important information that should have been leaked.

Now, the remaining question is whether Manning should spend a decade in prison for this. You can probably guess my opinion. As many have already pointed out, the purveyors of the murder and torture that he did expose, largely remain without prosecution. What a fascinating statement about this stupid country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2013, 01:51 PM
 
Location: SW MO
23,593 posts, read 37,466,118 times
Reputation: 29337
Quote:
Originally Posted by cometclear View Post
Who has said that the state should be allowed no ability to conduct covert operations, must reveal everything to the public or have no military. I must have missed that. More than anything, I think it was dumb to release everything, because it allows the fascists to obscure the important information that should have been leaked.

Now, the remaining question is whether Manning should spend a decade in prison for this. You can probably guess my opinion. As many have already pointed out, the purveyors of the murder and torture that he did expose, largely remain without prosecution. What a fascinating statement about this stupid country.
Does that mean we can count on you unassing the AO sometime in the near future?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2013, 01:59 PM
 
5,261 posts, read 4,154,407 times
Reputation: 2264
Quote:
Originally Posted by Curmudgeon View Post
Does that mean we can count on you unassing the AO sometime in the near future?
I'm opposed to both assing and unassing, so no.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top