Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-25-2013, 04:32 PM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,725,169 times
Reputation: 20674

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by boner View Post
This is the perfect example of where we need govt to step in and provide subsidies, care and treatment for a vulnerable group. Taking over the entire medical insurance industry so you can parcel it out to lobbies and cronies is an unethical power grab
When did ( federal) government take over the entire medical insurance industry?

Each insurer currently and under ACA, be licensed by their state and follow the laws of their politically appointed state insurance commission. No two states have the same insurance laws. ACA has leveled the playing field somewhat in terms of maximum out of pocket, annual and lifetime caps , the inclusion of emergency treatment and 10 essential care items.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-25-2013, 04:32 PM
 
Location: Pluto's Home Town
9,982 posts, read 13,759,513 times
Reputation: 5691
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iamme73 View Post
Depend on charity and friends and family.

I think this is where I draw the line. As I reach the end of my 5th decade of life, I have been blessed with almost perfect health. I don't really deserve it. I drink and eat too much and exercise too little. But for the grace of God, I could be destitute from cancer of some other disease. I am healthy and pay into the pool each month, and I am thankful. I know others who have been struck down. I don't want those people to be financially devastated even as they are dealing with a horrible setback physically. I am glad to pay into a larger pool, so that if any of us get sticken, we can just get treated and try to pull our lives back together (assuming recovery is possible).

In my brother's case, he is now in the prime of life, and I would hate to think he (or anyone else like him) would have to go through the rest of his life uninsured and vulnerable to financial calamity from illness. This is a big friggin' deal for me. So, even though ObamaCare has its flaws (and we all know that more will emerge in the coming months), it addresses a huge hole in our system and will substantially improve the health and financial security of millions of Americans. It is a tax, but a morally defensible one, IMO.

I have not yet seen a single GOP alternative (other than ObamaCare, which is essentially a GOP idea) which would provide security for the vulnerable.

Last edited by Fiddlehead; 09-25-2013 at 04:52 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-25-2013, 04:33 PM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,725,169 times
Reputation: 20674
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aldous9 View Post
Tort reform might reduce costs(lots of studies say it wouldn't) but not enough to where a cancer survivor would get insured.

The buy across state lines argument is just a bunch of nonsense though. There is absolutely nothing preventing an insurance company from Texas getting licensed in California and doing business.
And they do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-25-2013, 04:38 PM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,725,169 times
Reputation: 20674
Quote:
Originally Posted by shooting4life View Post
Increase competition reduces prices. Plus when many people to to the dr they have no idea what it actually costs. This allows hospitals/dr to jack up the costs and the insurance company just pays then jacks up the rates. If people compared the price of services like everywhere else in life hospitals/dr would have to be competitive and reduce rates.
Most folk are not in a position to shop for a hospital like they shop for a vacation.

An outpatient surgery can turn into an O/N stay. An O/N stay can turn into 5 days if complications/infections present. The variables are endless.

Most healthcare policies provide for PPO. Not all hospitals are covered by all insurer's PPO.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-25-2013, 04:40 PM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,725,169 times
Reputation: 20674
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
Believe it or not, but GOP proposed a solution in the 1990s which was a counter proposal to Clinton HC plan. It has all main components of Obamacare in it, including the insurance mandates, and insurance exchanges. Basically it was Obamacare, under a different name. It was a Universal Health Care Plan "Basic Reforms to Expand Access to Health Insurance Coverage and to Ensure Universal Coverage".

If you read it, you will see where the ideas for Obamacare came from. They came from the GOP. As a matter of fact it was so similar people today would not be able to tell them apart.
ACA should have been called Plan B.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-25-2013, 04:44 PM
 
8,391 posts, read 6,295,442 times
Reputation: 2314
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiddlehead View Post
I think this is where I draw the line. As I reach the end of my 5th decade of life, I have been blessed with almost perfect health. I don't really deserve it. I drink and eat too much and exercise too little. But for the grace of God, I could be destitute from cancer of some other disease. I am healthy and pay into the pool each month. I know others who have been struck down. I don't want those people to be financially devastated even as they are dealing with a horrible setback physically. I am glad to pay into a larger pool, so that if any of us get sticken, we can just get treated and try to pull our lives back together (assuming recovery is possible).

In my brother's case, he is now in the prime of life, and I would hate to think he (or anyone else like him) would have to go through the rest of his life uninsured and vulnerable to financial calamity from illness. This is a big friggin' deal for me. So, even though ObamaCare has its flaws (and we all know that more will emerge in the coming months), it addresses a huge hole in our system and will substantially improve the health and financial security of millions of Americans. It is a tax, but a morally defensible one, IMO.

I have not yet seen a single GOP alternative (other than ObamaCare, which is essentially a GOP idea) which would provide security for the vulnerable.
I agree with you. I was just addressing the GOP alternative for cancer survivors who can't get health insurance is to depend on charity, family, and friends.

They have no plan that can help. They have not proposed a plan that could help.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-25-2013, 04:46 PM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,725,169 times
Reputation: 20674
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiddlehead View Post
I have not yet seen a single GOP alternative (other than ObamaCare, which is essentially a GOP idea) which would provide security for the vulnerable.
It's been 3.5 years since ACA became law.
If 1/10 th of the time, energy and money had been invested into improving ACA, instead of spreading misinformation to the masses who generally do not understand insurance, imagine the outcome.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-25-2013, 04:57 PM
 
Location: S.E. US
13,163 posts, read 1,692,498 times
Reputation: 5132
Quote:
Originally Posted by middle-aged mom View Post
It's been 3.5 years since ACA became law.
If 1/10 th of the time, energy and money had been invested into improving ACA, instead of spreading misinformation to the masses who generally do not understand insurance, imagine the outcome.
If it had been sold to us based on the truth, not wishful thinking and fictious numbers, it would never have passed.

We are just beginning to see what is in the law, and what it is really going to cost.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-25-2013, 05:00 PM
 
1,496 posts, read 1,855,173 times
Reputation: 1223
Quote:
Originally Posted by southward bound View Post
If it had been sold to us based on the truth, not wishful thinking and fictious numbers, it would never have passed.

We are just beginning to see what is in the law, and what it is really going to cost.
remember, ACA is a republican plan. It's the Romney plan. It's the plan that the Heritage Foundation proposed back in the 90's to counter Clinton's more progressive plan.

It's on you, if you've been bamboozled by politics. Don't feel bad. A lot of people (myself included) get bamboozled by politics.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-25-2013, 05:26 PM
 
Location: Pluto's Home Town
9,982 posts, read 13,759,513 times
Reputation: 5691
Quote:
Originally Posted by southward bound View Post
If it had been sold to us based on the truth, not wishful thinking and fictious numbers, it would never have passed.

We are just beginning to see what is in the law, and what it is really going to cost.

Here's the thing. Yes, it will cost something. No doubt about it. But the benefits for our general well-being as a country are worth it. I think focusing on the nickels and dimes of it unestimates its profound importance. We could well be discussing the costs of having a military, or an interstate highway system, or the internet, or the national parks. All those involved some investment upfront and recurring costs, but they yield (arguably) a net positive for our society as a whole. The benefit of providing health care to those who cannot get it cannot be done for free, but is a moral imperative, IMO.

I think the big showdown in the 1990s was because the insurance lobby used all its power to kill single payer. But the bottomline is that social justice and decency have to trump profit in issues of the general welfare of the citizenry. Our current system serves industry, but does not do a good job for people like my brother.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top