Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Seriously...you are one disgustingly low troll to be using isolated cases of psychotic violence as a political cudgel. You should be ashamed of yourself. Your comments have no place in adult conversation.
No need to make it personal, when you got nothing else....
Just don't reply.
The idea that recent mass shooters are mostly registered Democrats is a myth
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harrier
Paul Ciancia, the LAX shooter, is reportedly a registered Democrat.
If so, then he joins good company with other Democratshooters and bombers like Adam Lanza, James Holmes, Jared Loughner, Nidal Hasan, and Dzohkhar Tsarnaev.
Why is it that Democrats want to ban guns, but they are also the perpetuators of mass shootings?
Where is your evidence that they were all Democrats?
Based on the assertions of Roger Hedgecock a right-wing radio show host, the meme that the five worst recent mass shootings were committed by registered Democrats is making its way through e-mail chains and social media. Hedgecock asserts, without providing any evidence or sources, that the Ft. Hood shooter, the Virginia Tech shooter, the Aurora Theater shooter and Adam Lanza of Sandy Hook infamy were all “registered Democrats”
Seriously...you are one disgustingly low troll to be using isolated cases of psychotic violence as a political cudgel. You should be ashamed of yourself. Your comments have no place in adult conversation.
I agree, it's pretty low, and happens every time there is high profile murders.
Paul Ciancia, the LAX shooter, is reportedly a registered Democrat.
If so, then he joins good company with other Democrat shooters and bombers like Adam Lanza, James Holmes, Jared Loughner, Nidal Hasan, and Dzohkhar Tsarnaev.
Why is it that Democrats want to ban guns, but they are also the perpetuators of mass shootings?
Seems to me the ones culpable are listed above...
I don't want to ban guns for the record, nor am I registered with any political party. I imagine there are plenty of shooters of all political ilks. Maybe that is the problem. The shooters not their politics.
The problem is not the intended target, not the shooter's reasoning, nor the type of firearm used, it is the fact that someone has become so enraged or deranged...that he has decided to use his weapon against someone else.
I'm am not offering any fix or solution, I'm just restating the obvious.
I'd recommend you crawl back under the rock you emerged from. You're barely recognizable has human.
His question isn't interesting at all. It's the ravings of an angry man child that was never weened from the teet. You are following in those same footsteps. Mommy never taught you the proper way to behave. The bullies in the school yard tried I'm sure but even their pounding on your skull didn't work. You have the intelligence of something your father should have left in a Kleenex instead of inside your mother.
You are describing a lot of liberals on this forum.
Location: Georgia, on the Florida line, right above Tallahassee
10,471 posts, read 15,833,234 times
Reputation: 6438
I like threads that base the thread on stupid. THe thread can literally go anywhere. I'm sure he was thinking of his voting choices as he was shooting people. Because, hey, makes a lot of ...no.... not one lick of sense would that make.
The truth is ... was not a Democrat, or a Republican, or a Tea Party member. He shared elements of all of the above but refused to conform to the basic rules of society like every civilized political party does. One can always find commonalities between an extremist and political party. Hitler believed in a strong military and Republicans do as well but that does not mean the two should be compared seriously. In the same ..... should not be labeled a Democrat or Republican. He was someone who tried to establish his own rules and when he lost he resorted to violence. That puts him in a group that includes terrorists like Timothy McVeigh but not George Bush or Barack Obama.
I agree, it's pretty low, and happens every time there is high profile murders.
Citing the truth about a gunmans political affiliation hardly seems low compared to parading Sandy Hook parents around the country to try and fulfill a political agenda. I like to keep things in perspective. Call Harrier whatever you want, he told the truth. Perhaps those that get their panties in a wad..and lose emotional stability after the truth is presented to them should self examine themselves and say " What is it about Democrats and guns that dont do well..since most Democrats commit murder with guns in this nation". Most gun violence is gang related in this nation. Those people and their offspring arent voting for Romney I can assure you that!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The idea that recent mass shooters are mostly registered Democrats is a myth
