Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-06-2013, 05:10 PM
 
Location: N/A
904 posts, read 687,866 times
Reputation: 209

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by jjrose View Post
AMENDMENT XIV

SECTION 1.

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

In this country, the constitution trumps your bible quotes.
No kidding. And i am pleased it does. Theocracies are not pleasant.

As well, it doesn't (Yet) Limit my choice to believe. Nor the right of the Creator to have the final say.
This existence is called temporal for a reason... it's temporary, and everyone gets graded.

 
Old 11-06-2013, 05:13 PM
 
Location: Middle of nowhere
24,260 posts, read 14,211,524 times
Reputation: 9895
Quote:
Originally Posted by NoOBama View Post
No kidding. And i am pleased it does. Theocracies are not pleasant.

As well, it doesn't (Yet) Limit my choice to believe. Nor the right of the Creator to have the final say.
This existence is called temporal for a reason... it's temporary, and everyone gets graded.
No one is telling you what to believe.
 
Old 11-06-2013, 05:14 PM
 
Location: N/A
904 posts, read 687,866 times
Reputation: 209
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjrose View Post
No one is telling you what to believe.
No one is keeping people from being together.
 
Old 11-06-2013, 05:15 PM
 
Location: Middle of nowhere
24,260 posts, read 14,211,524 times
Reputation: 9895
Quote:
Originally Posted by NoOBama View Post
No one is keeping people from being together.
Did you miss the part about equal protection of the law?
 
Old 11-06-2013, 05:16 PM
 
Location: N/A
904 posts, read 687,866 times
Reputation: 209
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjrose View Post
Did you miss the part about equal protection of the law?
Apparently the SCOTUS thinks differently.

You can interpret as you wish. It doesn't make it so.
 
Old 11-06-2013, 05:18 PM
 
Location: In a city
1,393 posts, read 3,174,164 times
Reputation: 782
Quote:
Originally Posted by SunnyKayak View Post
Awesome Step by Step , the day will come it when marriage equality is for everyone.
From your statement, then, you support polygamy, child brides, arranged marriages, and whatever floats your boat approach, right>
 
Old 11-06-2013, 05:21 PM
 
Location: N/A
904 posts, read 687,866 times
Reputation: 209
Quote:
Originally Posted by Froggie Legs View Post
From your statement, then, you support polygamy, child brides, arranged marriages, and whatever floats your boat approach, right>
WHat a bigot... you left out brother and sister.... first cousins.....brother and brother.....

Cat and dog...
 
Old 11-06-2013, 05:23 PM
 
Location: Middle of nowhere
24,260 posts, read 14,211,524 times
Reputation: 9895
Quote:
Originally Posted by NoOBama View Post
Apparently the SCOTUS thinks differently.

You can interpret as you wish. It doesn't make it so.
Again, please read up on what happened in the DOMA case. The USSC agreed with me.
 
Old 11-06-2013, 05:23 PM
 
Location: SoCal
5,899 posts, read 5,796,624 times
Reputation: 1930
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjrose View Post
1. I think at one time they could, but not anymore.

2. The advancements in genetics studies would crush that one, but I don't see a case making it to a court in the near future.
1. Well, considering that the U.S. Supreme Court previously had 8-1 rulings/decisions such as Buck v. Bell (1927), I wouldn't be too surprised by this.

2. Not if these individuals want to reproduce naturally. Also, this was a reponse to the genetic disorders part, and I don't think that it would apply to my point about pregnant women who want to give birth to defective children rather than to get abortions.
 
Old 11-06-2013, 05:24 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,187,290 times
Reputation: 7875
Quote:
Originally Posted by NoOBama View Post
Never go there... but it sure gets thrown into the public's face enough...

Even so far as trying to write hate laws, against freedom of belief, and expression.

One day the NSA will dumpster dive through all this drivel and try to incriminate those that disagree with gay choice.

Where's the equality in that?
What hate laws are being written? Also, when was the last time you had an anus thrown in your face?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top