Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-15-2013, 07:49 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,061 posts, read 44,866,510 times
Reputation: 13718

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by samiwas1 View Post
Yes, I've seen your graphic posted a dozen times in this thread. It should also be pointed out that while the lower 80%'s share of income has been going down year after year, the top 20% has seen only growth in their income.
THIS is why:
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Let's look at who PAYS local, state, and federal taxes, and who TAKES that money in the form of government benefits, services, and programs:

http://i993.photobucket.com/albums/a...g/spending.jpg

Or, if you prefer, a more recent analysis from the Chairman of the Economics Department at Harvard University:
Quote:
"Because transfer payments are, in effect, the opposite of taxes, it makes sense to look not just at taxes paid, but at taxes paid minus transfers received. For 2009, the most recent year available, here are taxes less transfers as a percentage of market income (income that households earned from their work and savings):

Bottom quintile: -301 percent
Second quintile: -42 percent
Middle quintile: -5 percent
Fourth quintile: 10 percent
Highest quintile: 22 percent
Top one percent: 28 percent

The negative 301 percent means that a typical family in the bottom quintile receives about $3 in transfer payments for every dollar earned.

The most surprising fact to me was that the effective tax rate is negative for the middle quintile. According to the CBO data, this number was +14 percent in 1979 (when the data begin) and remained positive through 2007. It was negative 0.5 percent in 2008, and negative 5 percent in 2009. That is, the middle class, having long been a net contributor to the funding of government, is now a net recipient of government largess."
Harvard University's Greg Mankiw: Most Americans Are Making A Profit Off Of Government

CBO report cited:
CBO | The Distribution of Household Income and Federal Taxes
60% are TAKING more than they contribute, making them a net drain on society. The 4th highest quintile are moderate contributors. But the top 20% is the demographic that's largely funding the federal government and all of its programs, and the top 1% even more so.

How do you not understand that under such a tax and government services and benefits structure, a very strong incentive exists for the government to promote as wide of an income gap as possible?

Last edited by CaseyB; 11-18-2013 at 11:09 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-15-2013, 08:56 AM
 
Location: Ohio
24,621 posts, read 19,177,123 times
Reputation: 21743
Quote:
Originally Posted by bUU View Post
In other words, you had no legitimate reply to moral repudiation ....
Morality is irrelevant.

It's Economics, not Philosophy.

Stating the obvious....

Mircea
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2013, 09:18 AM
 
14,292 posts, read 9,683,781 times
Reputation: 4254
Quote:
Originally Posted by greywar View Post
huh...those posts aren't nearly as interesting when you remove the cut/paste pasta.

OK heres the reality that should disturb you then. that top 1 percent shouldered 1 trillion dollars in taxes.....at a effective rate of 20.6% (and the top 400 of that 1%? Their effective rate was 16.6%)

In other words the top 1% pull in approx 5 trillion dollars.....
I don't always have hours of chat time to spend with you, so when I have to cut and run, all you get is a parting gift and maybe a web link to read.

The truly wealthy pay a 16% tax rate because they do not earn an "income" hence they never pay income taxes. So you guys can call for raising income taxes on "the rich" all you like, meanwhile the Warren Buffett, Wall Street fat cats of the world get cozy with the likes of Obama and make a killing off the fed essentially pumping $85 billion a month into their bank accounts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2013, 09:26 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,061 posts, read 44,866,510 times
Reputation: 13718
Quote:
Originally Posted by bUU View Post
In other words, you had no legitimate reply to moral repudiation of the perspectives you prefer
How is it moral to live off of the fruits of someone else's labor? That's called slavery.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2013, 09:27 AM
 
14,292 posts, read 9,683,781 times
Reputation: 4254
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
THIS is why:
60% are TAKING more than they contribute, making them a net drain on society. The 4th highest quintile are moderate contributors. But the top 20% is the demographic that's largely funding the federal government and all of its programs, and the top 1% even more so.

How do you not understand that under such a tax and government services and benefits structure, a very strong incentive exists for the government to promote as wide of an income gap as possible?
Because many people ignorant, not "informed," or they are just partisan political hacks and just repeat the talking points of their masters.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2013, 09:28 AM
 
Location: Ohio
24,621 posts, read 19,177,123 times
Reputation: 21743
Quote:
Originally Posted by michiganmoon View Post
A Model T with zero modern features in 1913 cost $550 or $13K in 2013...

A Hummer fully loaded with XM radio, power steering etc costs $54K...

We are being ripped off, we are being destroyed...look at that massive inflation!!! It costs so much more to get the exact same product - a automobile!!!

You are not being "ripped off" unless you believe America is the only country on Earth.


Quote:
Originally Posted by hnsq View Post
If you buy a $2,000 TV with a credit card and can't afford it, is that Best Buy's fault?
Yes, [but Bestbuy now] apparently [but Bestbuy now] subliminal [but Bestbuy now] messaging [but Bestbuy now] works [but Bestbuy now].

Quote:
Originally Posted by BoomBen View Post
OWS accomplished nothing.
That's not entirely true....they wasted a lot of tax-payer dollars and destroyed a lot of property.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gtownoe View Post
First off neither party is doing much for the poor and underpriveleged so that's a wash.
They do more than enough for the "underprivileged."

It is not the fault of government that the "underprivileged" refuse to take advantage of the opportunities handed to them on a silver platter.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gtownoe View Post
But what are Republicans doing to help the poor in this country?
They do more than enough for the "underprivileged."

Again, it is not the fault of Republicans that the "underprivileged" refuse to take advantage of the opportunities handed to them on a silver platter.

Being underprivileged is a choice, not a condition.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grizzmeister View Post
This is a fantastic video!
It was easy to debunk, since he lies and bases everything on fallacies.

Quote:
Originally Posted by greywar View Post
I had different words for that.

Horrifying, disgusting, perturbing, rage inducing, etc. But yeah. Its a excellent video to show people and help them understand whats been happening. Then they too can feel the same feelings of....rage, horror, and disgust as I do.
I also thought someone using fallacies and lies to make a video was "Horrifying, disgusting, perturbing, rage inducing, etc."

When you grow up you will understand that wealth is a choice....you can choose to create wealth, or not.

Reality is real...


Mircea
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2013, 09:37 AM
 
Location: Ohio
24,621 posts, read 19,177,123 times
Reputation: 21743
Quote:
Originally Posted by greywar View Post
I always love this bit, its SO compelling, so completely correct.....and sooo...misleading.
That would be a most excellent way of summarizing your position.....wealth is a choice....people choose to build wealth, or not.

Quote:
Originally Posted by greywar View Post
A bit of research shows that yes...as a % of disposable income thats correct....for us as a society. congratulations on demonstrating a awesome way to lie with statistics.
Disposable income is also a personal choice. You can choose to increase or decrease your disposable income at will, regardless of your income level.

Quote:
Originally Posted by greywar View Post
Well...one of us does, the rest are paying 66% of their income.
By choice.....you make bad choices and then demonize those who make good choices.....that's real smart.

Noting....

Mircea
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2013, 09:49 AM
 
8,560 posts, read 6,411,358 times
Reputation: 1173
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mircea View Post
That would be a most excellent way of summarizing your position.....wealth is a choice....people choose to build wealth, or not.



Disposable income is also a personal choice. You can choose to increase or decrease your disposable income at will, regardless of your income level.



By choice.....you make bad choices and then demonize those who make good choices.....that's real smart.

Noting....

Mircea
Well, I disagree with this. In order for what you say to be true people would have to have complete control over ALL circumstances in their lives. That's just not possible. WE cannot really control much at all, and when we do, we have control only for a short time. For example, being in the wrong place at the wrong time. The illusion of controlling all circumstances is so intoxicating. The ONLY thing one can somewhat control is what goes on in your head, your own thoughts. Also, what is a "good" choice anyway? If you make a "good choice" to do something that results in your making lots of money, gaining wealth, but ultimately leads to death or horrific injuries, was that really a good choice? Also, for example, how would someone who has an IQ of, say, 65, make "good" financial choices?

Okay. I'm preparing for the blast.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2013, 11:29 AM
 
5,633 posts, read 5,362,539 times
Reputation: 3855
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
THIS is why:
60% are TAKING more than they contribute, making them a net drain on society. The 4th highest quintile are moderate contributors. But the top 20% is the demographic that's largely funding the federal government and all of its programs, and the top 1% even more so.

How do you not understand that under such a tax and government services and benefits structure, a very strong incentive exists for the government to promote as wide of an income gap as possible?
That is your conclusion, not fact. And what you think is right, not fact. And if that is what you think, go ahead, I can't help you. I think it's absolutely asinine.

I never claimed that a lot of people didn't take more than they contribute, or that many contribute more than they receive. That's obvious. A lot of people also make a lot more than they contribute, but I wouldn't expect you to say anything about that. That's a fact of every single thing you do in life.

That being said, I've offered my opinion on how to make things better. So now, let's hear yours. And I mean specifics, not "we need to change taxes and junk". And if your solution is tax breaks for the wealthy, then please don't even bother.

Quote:
Originally Posted by OICU812 View Post
Because many people ignorant, not "informed," or they are just partisan political hacks and just repeat the talking points of their masters.
Of course, but what about the liberal posters?

You can't tell me that most of the right wing chatter on here is not just repeated talking points.

Quote:
Originally Posted by OICU812 View Post
The truly wealthy pay a 16% tax rate because they do not earn an "income" hence they never pay income taxes. So you guys can call for raising income taxes on "the rich" all you like, meanwhile the Warren Buffett, Wall Street fat cats of the world get cozy with the likes of Obama and make a killing off the fed essentially pumping $85 billion a month into their bank accounts.
This is why investment income should be treated as normal income. You did little to nothing to earn it, why should you get a break on it?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mircea View Post
It is not the fault of government that the "underprivileged" refuse to take advantage of the opportunities handed to them on a silver platter.
So if every unemployed and low-skill worker took advantage of every opportunity and all became smart enough to become doctors and lawyers and accountants...then what? What would happen? I hear this talking point (hey, OICU812...check it out) trotted out time and time again, but with no answer for what an entire country of people who took every opportunity would mean.

Quote:
It was easy to debunk, since he lies and bases everything on fallacies.
Such as? You need to at least say what you mean and not just throw out talking points (OICU812, see what I'm talking about).

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mircea View Post
That would be a most excellent way of summarizing your position.....wealth is a choice....people choose to build wealth, or not.

Disposable income is also a personal choice. You can choose to increase or decrease your disposable income at will, regardless of your income level.
I'm sure that's pretty easy to say if you've never been in that position.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2013, 11:56 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,061 posts, read 44,866,510 times
Reputation: 13718
Quote:
Originally Posted by samiwas1 View Post
That is your conclusion, not fact.
Actually, those ARE the facts. Published by the CBO.

60% are TAKING more than they contribute, making them a net drain on society. The 4th highest quintile are moderate contributors. But the top 20% is the demographic that's largely funding the federal government and all of its programs, and the top 1% even more so.
Quote:
And if your solution is tax breaks for the wealthy, then please don't even bother.
Are you under the impression that the European social democracy countries' regressive tax systems don't work?

Those European countries have the social programs leftists 'claim' they want, including national healthcare, and they have MUCH more income equality. Are you now saying you would rather stick with our progressive tax system and that you DON'T want European-style social programs and income equality anymore?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:02 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top