Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-22-2013, 11:41 AM
 
Location: Florida
23,173 posts, read 26,202,662 times
Reputation: 27914

Advertisements

From another board that does not deal at all in politics....
"Hi guys, I know most of you are in America but is there anyone from England that can give me advice please. I am trying to get to the bottom of my internal pains, which I believe could be intercostal neuralgia (I have bullous emphysema and A1AD) after alot of research I found out that lung disease can cause your intercostal nerves to give out sharp stabbing pains between your ribs etc as well as dull aching pains in your thoracic/abdominal area, I am trying to get referred to a neurologist to see what they suggest but my Doctor and specialist plus the useless registrar won't refer me! My Doctor wants to put me on Amitriptyline without knowing for sure, I keep phoning the hospital to speak to my specialist but I only get phoned back by the registrar who can't answer any of my questions. When the registrar phoned me back last night he said they are putting me in for a CT scan (which I myself had to push for) but he couldn't tell me when that would be and told me I could only speak to my specialist after I'd had the CT scan, but my Doctor said I would have to wait 5-6 weeks for a CT scan.
I am at the end of my tether here, they say you should see your Doctor and tell them about any new pains and they will help but what are you meant to do if you aren't allowed to speak to anyone and nobody listens to you?? It seems to be the age old problem that if you have a terminal illness that can't be fixed then they don't bother trying to help you :0( "
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-22-2013, 11:44 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,495,743 times
Reputation: 27720
Well folks we have Vermont going down that very path.
They have to provide a 3 year budget though that shows it being paid for and not going into debt.
They are also still debating how this will be paid for but most likely increased payroll taxes.

Medicare/medicaid in Vermont isn't being touched.
They are going to take all the Fed money they get and add their own to cover the cost.
It's been a few years in planning and will be a few more until full implementation.
And the state is getting directly involved in provider costs/payments..something Obamacare is not involved in.

Then it will be a few more for studies and cost comparisons.
I'd venture it will be a good 10 years before anyone can say whether it worked or not.

Something like this could NEVER be accomplished at the Fed level people.
If you want single payer then it's your state you need to talk to.

Unified Green Mountain Care | Vermont Health Care Reform
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2013, 11:50 AM
 
Location: The High Plains
525 posts, read 508,658 times
Reputation: 244
Listed below is the complete World Health Report for 2000. This is widely regarded as one of the most comprehensive study of healthcare systems ever conducted. It compares treatment times, expense per citizen as a percentage of GDP, household contributions to health, out of pocket cost, life expectancy, mortality from cancers/cardiovascular disease, equality of treatment across income levels, infant mortality, adminstrative cost, bureucratic waste, physicians per patient, nurses per patient, perscriptions unfilled, and a plethora of others.

France is number one........The USA is number 36.

http://www.who.int/whr/2000/en/whr00_en.pdf
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2013, 11:53 AM
 
8,630 posts, read 9,139,445 times
Reputation: 5990
Quote:
Originally Posted by old_cold View Post
From another board that does not deal at all in politics....
"Hi guys, I know most of you are in America but is there anyone from England that can give me advice please. I am trying to get to the bottom of my internal pains, which I believe could be intercostal neuralgia (I have bullous emphysema and A1AD) after alot of research I found out that lung disease can cause your intercostal nerves to give out sharp stabbing pains between your ribs etc as well as dull aching pains in your thoracic/abdominal area, I am trying to get referred to a neurologist to see what they suggest but my Doctor and specialist plus the useless registrar won't refer me! My Doctor wants to put me on Amitriptyline without knowing for sure, I keep phoning the hospital to speak to my specialist but I only get phoned back by the registrar who can't answer any of my questions. When the registrar phoned me back last night he said they are putting me in for a CT scan (which I myself had to push for) but he couldn't tell me when that would be and told me I could only speak to my specialist after I'd had the CT scan, but my Doctor said I would have to wait 5-6 weeks for a CT scan.
I am at the end of my tether here, they say you should see your Doctor and tell them about any new pains and they will help but what are you meant to do if you aren't allowed to speak to anyone and nobody listens to you?? It seems to be the age old problem that if you have a terminal illness that can't be fixed then they don't bother trying to help you :0( "
Sounds like here in the States. Ever had an HMO? Have you ever had a relatively rare disease here in the States where doctors bounce a patient from one to the other while the patient suffers from a lack of treatment? Have you ever had to ditch your insurance and pay out of pocket because the insurance company deemed you did not need this treatment or those particular medicines while still paying a premium? No
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2013, 11:55 AM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,488,320 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by AZcardinal402 View Post
8. Cost savings. A single payer system would produce the savings needed to cover everyone, largely by using existing resources without the waste. Taiwan, shifting from a U.S. healthcare model, adopted a single-payer system in 1995, boosting health coverage from 57% to 97% with little if any increase in overall healthcare spending.
way wrong


1. we(the USA) have a population of 320 million

2. with less than 100 million tax payers


we would be ok with singlepayer (as long as its not the typical governmental CRAPcare)...except for the COST..something liberals NEVER WANT TO ADMIT TO

1. mediCARE is not singlepayer...it is a 80/20 insurance

2. the closest thing to singlepayer is medicAID

fact to cover all 320 million people at 80/20 would cost about 3 trillion a year...to cover all at 100% would cost about 6 trillion

number of tax FILERS 130 million...number with a POSITIVE TAX LIABILITY about 65 million

6 trillion divided by 130 million is......46k.

do you ( a taxpayer) have 46 THOUSAND DOLLARS laying around YEARLY.....I think not

even at the 3 trillion mark...that is over 23 thousand a year


singlepayer is ABUSE of the taxpayer


singlepayer would cost 3 - 6 trillion ANNUALLY (remember the federal government ALREADY SPENDS 1 trillion a year between medicare/medicaid/ and the VA)...meanwhile our national revenue(personal income/ coprprate income/ and excise taxes) is only 2.5 trillion


you do the math... the taxpayer cant afford it


singlepayer...would cost 3 to 6 trillion in the USA to cover the 320 million people...depending on the EXTENT of the coverage (ie 3 trillion for a 80/20 policy with many things not covered...or 6 trillion with a 100% (medicaid type) coverage minus cosmetic)

we have 120 million tax FILERS
of those 120 million tax FILERS nearly 50% dont have a positive tax liability (pay taxes)

3 trillion divided by (the full filers) 120 million is 25k
6 trillion divided by 120 million is 50k

3 trillion divided by 65 million (high estimeate of actual tax payers) is 46k
6 trillion divided by 65 million is 90k

can the average tax payer afford 25k - 90k in taxes ANNUALLY????

oh and btw the average health insurance premium is nearly 20k also...most workers only pay 25% while their EMPLOYER pays the other 75%...under singlepayer..no more employer chipping in...its ALL on the taxpayer
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2013, 11:58 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,495,743 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by AZcardinal402 View Post
Listed below is the complete World Health Report for 2000. This is widely regarded as one of the most comprehensive study of healthcare systems ever conducted. It compares treatment times, expense per citizen as a percentage of GDP, household contributions to health, out of pocket cost, life expectancy, mortality from cancers/cardiovascular disease, equality of treatment across income levels, infant mortality, adminstrative cost, bureucratic waste, physicians per patient, nurses per patient, perscriptions unfilled, and a plethora of others.

France is number one........The USA is number 36.

http://www.who.int/whr/2000/en/whr00_en.pdf
I see posts like these and ask.."how do they pay for it".

5.25% of your paycheck/any capital gains just for healthcare
3.95% of your pension check just for healthcare.

People pay out of pocket and get reimbursed 75% by the government.
The 25% can be somewhat recovered by having private health insurance.

There ya go. Back to raising FICA just like I said after you posted about Austria and I came back with how they paid for it.

It's all done through high payroll tax deduction..8% in Austria and 5.25/4.00% in France.
Raise the employee FICA to 15-20% here and you too can have this wonderful healthcare system.
Oh and also have the government get directly involved with costs/reimbursements otherwise it won't work.

Health care in France - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2013, 12:00 PM
 
Location: The High Plains
525 posts, read 508,658 times
Reputation: 244
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
I see posts like these and ask.."how do they pay for it".

5.25% of your paycheck/any capital gains just for healthcare
3.95% of your pension check just for healthcare.

People pay out of pocket and get reimbursed 75% by the government.
The 25% can be somewhat recovered by having private health insurance.

There ya go. Back to raising FICA just like I said after you posted about Austria and I came back with how they paid for it.

It's all done through high payroll tax deduction..8% in Austria and 5.25/4.00% in France.
Raise the employee FICA to 15-20% here and you too can have this wonderful healthcare system.
Oh and also have the government get directly involved with costs/reimbursements otherwise it won't work.

Health care in France - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I'm not denying that the tax wedge in these countries is higher than ours. But the metrics indicate they get better service because of it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2013, 12:01 PM
 
Location: On the Group W bench
5,563 posts, read 4,263,400 times
Reputation: 2127
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmking View Post
Sounds like here in the States. Ever had an HMO? Have you ever had a relatively rare disease here in the States where doctors bounce a patient from one to the other while the patient suffers from a lack of treatment? Have you ever had to ditch your insurance and pay out of pocket because the insurance company deemed you did not need this treatment or those particular medicines while still paying a premium? No
And of course as long as we're tossing around individual anecdotes:

When I visited some old UK friends last year, the wife had just completed comprehensive treatment for breast cancer. She is thankfully in remission. National Health covered EVERYTHING, from initial diagnosis to meds to surgery to chemo … you name it. Her life was saved, period, at a cost which she could never have borne on her own.

The husband, while I was there, was suffering some kind of painful repetitive motion injury in his hand, probably related to work. He saw a doctor immediately and was given a choice of 2 specialists to see next. He chose the one who could see him within the week.

Like I said, individual anecdotes. I doubt that any system is perfect, and that poster's local health service seems to have problems. But I also believe that the Brits would NEVER give up their National Health on the whole.

Why doesn't someone ask that British poster if she'd rather live here and have NO options, or wrestle with whatever problems her individual community seems to have with helping her?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2013, 12:02 PM
 
9,470 posts, read 6,969,876 times
Reputation: 2177
Quote:
Originally Posted by weltschmerz View Post
Baloney. People with urgent issues don't wait in line. The lines are for elective procedures.
The number of Canadians who go to the US is less than one half of one percent, and many of those are elderly snowbirds who are already in the US for the winter and get sick.
It's the definition of "elective" that is the devil.

A broken vein or artery in Canada is not "emergency".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2013, 12:02 PM
 
Location: On the Group W bench
5,563 posts, read 4,263,400 times
Reputation: 2127
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
I see posts like these and ask.."how do they pay for it".

5.25% of your paycheck/any capital gains just for healthcare
3.95% of your pension check just for healthcare.

People pay out of pocket and get reimbursed 75% by the government.
The 25% can be somewhat recovered by having private health insurance.

There ya go. Back to raising FICA just like I said after you posted about Austria and I came back with how they paid for it.

It's all done through high payroll tax deduction..8% in Austria and 5.25/4.00% in France.
Raise the employee FICA to 15-20% here and you too can have this wonderful healthcare system.
Oh and also have the government get directly involved with costs/reimbursements otherwise it won't work.

Health care in France - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
And I'd STILL love to get back the $563.52 I pay every month into my health insurance -- and have no deductibles.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:47 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top