Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-24-2013, 08:32 AM
 
2,836 posts, read 3,496,479 times
Reputation: 1406

Advertisements

The size of the Supreme Court is nine justices, whose salaries may not be diminished under the Constitution; and such staff personnel as the court may hire each judicial term.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-24-2013, 08:33 AM
 
33,387 posts, read 34,847,766 times
Reputation: 20030
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wendell Phillips View Post
I'm sure that the justices of the Supreme Court will be waiting with bated breath for your "brilliant" amicus brief that corrects the errors of their thinking.
in other words you have no argument for increasing the size of the scotus, so you resort to impuning my character. got it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2013, 08:37 AM
 
2,836 posts, read 3,496,479 times
Reputation: 1406
You have no grounds to criticize the decisions of the Supreme Court, which is the final arbiter of the Constitution, and is binding as law. To put it simply for you: as a matter of law, the Constitution says what the Supreme Court says it says. Get used to it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2013, 08:37 AM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,080,363 times
Reputation: 3954
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nodpete View Post
The only thing lacking in this Supreme Court is brainpower , this sorry collection of judges should never hear a case, let alone have the power to make laws. I know, I know, only Congress can make laws, but when these idiots (mostly Roberts) decided that forcing people to buy health insurance was a "Tax" , they made it a law.
Well there you go. There's your problem right there. When you write, "I know, I know, only Congress can make laws" you are only actually saying "I know, I know... essentially nothing about who can or cannot make laws."

Under our Constitution there are four different sources of law.

1) At the base is Constitutional law from which all other laws derive and to which all other laws must conform.

2) Next comes "statutory law" which is created by the legislature under the authority of Article I of the Constitution. When in conflict, all statutory law must concede to Constitutional law.

3) Next comes "regulatory law" which is created by the executive branch under the authority of Article II of the Constitution. When in conflict, all regulatory law must concede to statutory and Constitutional law.

4) Finally comes the "common law" which is created by the judicial branch under the authority of Article III of the Constitution. When in conflict, all common law must concede to regulatory, statutory and Constitutional law.

All three branches of government make law.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2013, 08:58 AM
 
45,227 posts, read 26,450,499 times
Reputation: 24985
Supreme court - politicians wearing robes, the number of justices is irrelevant as they almost without exception weigh in on the side of government.
Funny that a so called conservative justice cast the deciding vote for obabamcare.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2013, 09:12 AM
 
4,512 posts, read 5,055,664 times
Reputation: 13406
Quote:
Originally Posted by HistorianDude View Post
Well there you go. There's your problem right there. When you write, "I know, I know, only Congress can make laws" you are only actually saying "I know, I know... essentially nothing about who can or cannot make laws."

Under our Constitution there are four different sources of law.

1) At the base is Constitutional law from which all other laws derive and to which all other laws must conform.

2) Next comes "statutory law" which is created by the legislature under the authority of Article I of the Constitution. When in conflict, all statutory law must concede to Constitutional law.

3) Next comes "regulatory law" which is created by the executive branch under the authority of Article II of the Constitution. When in conflict, all regulatory law must concede to statutory and Constitutional law.

4) Finally comes the "common law" which is created by the judicial branch under the authority of Article III of the Constitution. When in conflict, all common law must concede to regulatory, statutory and Constitutional law.

All three branches of government make law.
Your right about what you say, BUT- the SC does not "make laws" it interprets them to be constitutional or not, it does not initiate any laws. The executive branch cannot make any law, it can write or request (for a lack of a better term) a law, but ONLY congress can make it a law.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2013, 09:23 AM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,080,363 times
Reputation: 3954
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nodpete View Post
Your right about what you say, BUT- the SC does not "make laws" it interprets them to be constitutional or not, it does not initiate any laws.
Those are two different things, and the Supreme Court does both at different times. You need to look up "common law." It not only is law that is absolutely "initiated" by the courts, but we inherited a vast amount of our law from courts that weren't even American, and the Constitution itself is derived mostly from the English common law that pre-existed the formation of our nation.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nodpete
The executive branch cannot make any law, it can write or request (for a lack of a better term) a law, but ONLY congress can make it a law.
Again, nonsense. Have you never heard of a federal rule or regulation? Have you never heard of an executive order? Those are not statutes, but it would not serve you well to labor under the misconception that they were not laws.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2013, 09:28 AM
 
4,512 posts, read 5,055,664 times
Reputation: 13406
Man, I'm glad I never had to sit through your classes ! All you're doing is nit-picking the definition of the word law.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2013, 09:36 AM
 
13,303 posts, read 7,872,015 times
Reputation: 2144
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nodpete View Post
Your right about what you say, BUT- the SC does not "make laws" it interprets them to be constitutional or not, it does not initiate any laws. The executive branch cannot make any law, it can write or request (for a lack of a better term) a law, but ONLY congress can make it a law.
It can rule that the second amendment is unconstitutional!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2013, 09:41 AM
 
14,917 posts, read 13,103,566 times
Reputation: 4828
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbohm View Post
the scotus, which deals only with constitutionality of the laws brought before them.
The Supreme Court does not sit only to deal with the constitutionality of the laws brought before it. Interpreting the Constitution is an ancillary function of the SC. The SC is like any other court in the US - it simply decides cases. It chooses only the most important cases, and by virtue of being the highest (federal) court in the land, its holdings often do decide issues of constitutionality.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:19 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top