Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I guess your sarcasm meter is broken, unless it's just overpowered by your frothy gun grabbing ultra-liberal ideological never-surrender "I must always be right" way that you tend to have about things.
Regardless, you were wrong. Again. As usual.
Nope. Lots of gun types here bragging constantly about violence, revolution, etc etc. Not that any of us believe the keyboard cowboys, but it's fun to point out their hypocrisy.
Nope. Lots of gun types here bragging constantly about violence, revolution, etc etc. Not that any of us believe the keyboard cowboys, but it's fun to point out their hypocrisy.
Whats fascinating is that it doesn't exempt police officers. And yet the governor has specifically said that police officers are exempt.
Bloomberg apparently supported the act heavily.
LOL....some firearm manufacturers have refused to sell weapons to the NY police departments since it would be technically illegal to do so.
MANY of the counties have refused to implement or support the law, and it is currently being opposed in court.
Overall...this was a hasty response to the sandy shootings, and is a horrible idea.
I suspect a lot of people will be prepping weapons for long term storage, and burying them.
The only issue was retired police officers and they amended the law to allow them to retain their guns if certain criteria was met.
There is no issue with police departments acquiring guns and the counties are enforcing the legislation. The legislation was minimal and generally supported as sensible regulation.
The only issue was retired police officers and they amended the law to allow them to retain their guns if certain criteria was met.
There is no issue with police departments acquiring guns and the counties are enforcing the legislation. The legislation was minimal and generally supported as sensible regulation.
I assure you, theres some 50 cal weapons they can no longer purchase. Additionally two gun companies are looking at moving.
Seriously this is the sort of thing that doesn't help. You want to help avoid situations like sandy hook, etc? Fund mental health counseling. Taking peoples weapons away will not help.
If true this isn't worth the time, effort or cost it took to print the paper. Few if any will be turning in anything.
So much for the myth of the law abiding gun owner. If someone wants to own a high capacity weapon they need to move to a gun friendly state. Just like a marijuana afficianado is going to have issues if they choose to live in Oklahoma instead of Colorado.
I thought right wing gun nuts were all about states rights and a limited federal government.
So much for the myth of the law abiding gun owner. If someone wants to own a high capacity weapon they need to move to a gun friendly state. Just like a marijuana afficianado is going to have issues if they choose to live in Oklahoma instead of Colorado.
I thought right wing gun nuts were all about states rights and a limited federal government.
right wing gun nuts generally are all about constitutional rights too, so that's probably why there is resistance.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
