Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Media Matters analyzes the dominant American news sources including NBC, ABC, CBS, PBS, CNN, MSNBC, CNBC, and Fox News Channel. Its techniques include content analysis, fact checking, monitoring, and comparison of quotes or presentations from media figures to primary documents such as Pentagon or Government Accountability Office reports....Can you point out any misinformation published by Media Matters?
It would be nice if you deniers learned to think for yourselves, but I guess that is too much to expect.
Seriously? As political media attack dogs go, George Soros' pet project, Media Matters, has one of worst cases of leftist rabies imaginable.
Media Matters is entirely partisan propaganda. Anyone who thinks Media Matters is even remotely credible, has absolutely no credibility themselves, and is obviously a left-wing shill with a Marxist agenda.
Seriously? As political media attack dogs go, George Soros' pet project, Media Matters, has one of worst cases of leftist rabies imaginable.
Media Matters is entirely partisan propaganda. Anyone who thinks Media Matters is even remotely credible, has absolutely no credibility themselves, and is obviously a left-wing shill with a Marxist agenda.
Can you point out and prove any misinformation published by Media Matters? I didn't think so.
I look at the green energy failure of Spain. And in the US. And the forest of solar collectors in the Mojave desert. What an eyesore. Not to mention the thousands of birds killed by wind generators.
You should see this town in Minnesota called Manchester, it's a freaking nightmare of a hundred huge 200' tall windmills. It's soooo ugly, no one will want to move there
Can I just take this time to say one thing: does it matter?
If global warming is real, then the effort to replace fossil fuels (which is more or less the goal, as global warming is caused by higher carbon emissions) with clean, renewable energy was necessary.
If global warming is simply a misinterpretation of facts, we still benefit from the new energy source?
Here's a fact even the right wing can't deny: fossils fuels are limited. We're going to run out. What happens then? We'll need a new source of energy that is renewable, accessible, and ideally affordable. Realistically, that energy source needs to be capable of replacing the current one before our fossil fuels are depleted, and that's going to happen sooner than you'd think; possibly in YOUR life time, and if not, certainly in the life time of your children.
Every species goal is to survive. This means protecting the future, not just for us, but for our decedents. Do we really want to leave another issue we could be resolving now to future generations? I mean, seriously! It's time to act! We have so many sources of energy that are clean and completely renewable. Wind wont' stop blowing and the sun's got another 4 billion years. Oil has maybe 50.
Clean energy is the future, because eventually it will be the only option. No matter how fearful we are of change, it's won't stop. We need to be ready for the future before it hits. The list of problems in the world is a long one, why not make it one shorter? Find a new source of energy that is clean, affordable, and renewable so that we can have some level of stability in an unstable future.
Can I just take this time to say one thing: does it matter?
If global warming is real, then the effort to replace fossil fuels (which is more or less the goal, as global warming is caused by higher carbon emissions) with clean, renewable energy was necessary.
If global warming is simply a misinterpretation of facts, we still benefit from the new energy source?
Here's a fact even the right wing can't deny: fossils fuels are limited. We're going to run out. What happens then? We'll need a new source of energy that is renewable, accessible, and ideally affordable. Realistically, that energy source needs to be capable of replacing the current one before our fossil fuels are depleted, and that's going to happen sooner than you'd think; possibly in YOUR life time, and if not, certainly in the life time of your children.
Every species goal is to survive. This means protecting the future, not just for us, but for our decedents. Do we really want to leave another issue we could be resolving now to future generations? I mean, seriously! It's time to act! We have so many sources of energy that are clean and completely renewable. Wind wont' stop blowing and the sun's got another 4 billion years. Oil has maybe 50.
Clean energy is the future, because eventually it will be the only option. No matter how fearful we are of change, it's won't stop. We need to be ready for the future before it hits. The list of problems in the world is a long one, why not make it one shorter? Find a new source of energy that is clean, affordable, and renewable so that we can have some level of stability in an unstable future.
Here is a bit of reality that liberal freaks are incapable of comprehending: Before you can get rid of one source of energy, you need to replace it with another source of energy. Abolishing fossil fuels without any viable alternative energy source will only result in putting us back into the stone age living out of caves. Granted, that is the goal of liberal freaks, however, more sane minds would prefer a viable alternative first. Until that happens we are going to continue to consume fossils fuels at a prodigious rate. That is simply a fact of reality.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.