Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Charles Gillette, who was registering magazines, told the news station that he would have a problem with it if the state was trying to ban the magazines or firearms, but said “if they want to just know where they are, that’s fine with me.”
He really has no clue what is coming does he? Some people are just ignorant that way. It's too bad he's not smart enough to realize that "they have to know where they are" before they can effectively ban them.
What is your issue with this now? no one is grabbing the guns. They are registering them.
Nothing unconstitutional about it. It's a law in the state now. The "Sheeple" as you call them are simply complying with new state law. Big deal. It's a non-issue unless you want to make it one, which apparently you do.
What is your issue with this now? no one is grabbing the guns. They are registering them.
Nothing unconstitutional about it. It's a law in the state now. The "Sheeple" as you call them are simply complying with new state law. Big deal. It's a non-issue unless you want to make it one, which apparently you do.
Gun nuts have a problem with anything relating to guns. They'd prefer to be able to stand in the middle of the street shooting people with no consequences.
Exactly. President Obama has been perhaps the greatest gun salesman in our nation's history, and all without seizing a single firearm. The gun industry must love him.
What is your issue with this now? no one is grabbing the guns. They are registering them.
Nothing unconstitutional about it. It's a law in the state now. The "Sheeple" as you call them are simply complying with new state law. Big deal. It's a non-issue unless you want to make it one, which apparently you do.
And what is the sole purpose for a registration? To tax, or to take, that is it. Having the gun registered doesn't prevent the owner from shooting a school up with it, nor does it prevent the owner from illegally selling it to someone who wants to shoot a school up with it.
What is your issue with this now? no one is grabbing the guns. They are registering them.
Nothing unconstitutional about it. It's a law in the state now. The "Sheeple" as you call them are simply complying with new state law. Big deal. It's a non-issue unless you want to make it one, which apparently you do.
Maybe we should create a database of how you vote. I don't have a problem with you voting, I just need to know who you voted for. Let's pass a law. I'm sure you'll comply.
Gun nuts have a problem with anything relating to guns. They'd prefer to be able to stand in the middle of the street shooting people with no consequences.
Yep! You're right! That is exactly what I want to do....
Charles Gillette, who was registering magazines, told the news station that he would have a problem with it if the state was trying to ban the magazines or firearms, but said “if they want to just know where they are, that’s fine with me.”
He really has no clue what is coming does he? Some people are just ignorant that way. It's too bad he's not smart enough to realize that "they have to know where they are" before they can effectively ban them.
I find it hard to take anyone seriously who refers to humans as "sheeple".
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
, it is a big so what.
