Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-12-2014, 02:12 PM
 
Location: Arizona
2,559 posts, read 2,221,309 times
Reputation: 3922

Advertisements

Guns and marijuana - wonder what's next? A number of Law Enforcement officials in various states (mainly in the West, IIRC) have come out and said that they would refuse to enforce any gun laws that they deem unconstitutional.

Yahoo!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-12-2014, 02:15 PM
 
12,270 posts, read 11,337,216 times
Reputation: 8066
Nullification is the new "in" thing. What the hell,Obama and Holder do it, why shouldn't the rest of the country. We are headed for chaos.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2014, 02:18 PM
 
Location: texas
9,127 posts, read 7,948,601 times
Reputation: 2385
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slater View Post
Guns and marijuana - wonder what's next? A number of Law Enforcement officials in various states (mainly in the West, IIRC) have come out and said that they would refuse to enforce any gun laws that they deem unconstitutional.

Yahoo!
Not complying with a federal law does not make a State vs. Federal stand off. It just means local sheriffs will not enforce the federal law.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2014, 07:38 PM
 
Location: San Diego California
6,795 posts, read 7,292,547 times
Reputation: 5194
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dockside View Post
Nullification is the new "in" thing. What the hell,Obama and Holder do it, why shouldn't the rest of the country. We are headed for chaos.
Nullification is the duty of all citizen's and all states. It is not chaos, it is the natural evolution of a healthy republic in preventing the tyranny of government.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2014, 07:55 PM
 
Location: Wasilla, Alaska
17,823 posts, read 23,464,843 times
Reputation: 6541
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dockside View Post
Nullification is the new "in" thing. What the hell,Obama and Holder do it, why shouldn't the rest of the country. We are headed for chaos.
Chaos was two exits ago, we are rapidly approaching total insanity.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2014, 08:07 PM
 
Location: Wasilla, Alaska
17,823 posts, read 23,464,843 times
Reputation: 6541
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chimuelojones View Post
Not complying with a federal law does not make a State vs. Federal stand off. It just means local sheriffs will not enforce the federal law.
Alaska does not have Sheriffs. However, we do have our Alaska Firearms Freedom Act that was enacted into law in May, 2010, which nullifies all federal laws and regulations when it concerns firearms, firearm accessories, or ammunition manufactured, sold, and used wholly within the State of Alaska.

If Alaskans want to manufacture fully automatic machine guns, that the federal government knows nothing about, they can legally do so in Alaska.

Every firearm regulation imposed by the federal government does so solely on the premise that it has the constitutional authority under the Commerce Clause. Since the Commerce Clause only extends to interstate or international commerce, and not intrastate commerce, the federal government has absolutely no say in the matter.

Alaska is one of eight States that have enacted similar laws. The Wyoming version of the Firearms Freedom Act goes so far as to allow for the arrest and detention of federal officers attempting to enforce federal gun control laws in the State of Wyoming.

This has more to do with States exerting their constitutional authority under the Tenth Amendment, and not about nullification. The federal government, when left unchallenged, usurps the constitutional authority of the States whenever they can. Like they have already done with education, social programs, and health care insurance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2014, 08:10 PM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,663,022 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slater View Post
Guns and marijuana - wonder what's next? A number of Law Enforcement officials in various states (mainly in the West, IIRC) have come out and said that they would refuse to enforce any gun laws that they deem unconstitutional.

Yahoo!


It has mainly been the only constitutionally recognized law enforcement. The elected Sheriffs, not the hired guns to protect the elite, called police.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2014, 08:39 PM
 
Location: Missouri
4,272 posts, read 3,790,095 times
Reputation: 1937
The judicial branch is the constitutionally authorized branch to INTERPRET the constitution, not the executive branch.

So, how is it appropriate for law enforcement to deem a law unconstitutional? Sheriffs should do their job and leave the interpreting to the courts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2014, 11:33 PM
 
Location: somewhere in the woods
16,880 posts, read 15,207,835 times
Reputation: 5240
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dockside View Post
Nullification is the new "in" thing. What the hell,Obama and Holder do it, why shouldn't the rest of the country. We are headed for chaos.

sooner than most of the sheep think or believe.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2014, 11:39 PM
 
Location: Wasilla, Alaska
17,823 posts, read 23,464,843 times
Reputation: 6541
Quote:
Originally Posted by geofra View Post
The judicial branch is the constitutionally authorized branch to INTERPRET the constitution, not the executive branch.

So, how is it appropriate for law enforcement to deem a law unconstitutional? Sheriffs should do their job and leave the interpreting to the courts.
Not true. No where within the US Constitution will you find any authorization for any branch of government to interpret the US Constitution. That is authority the Supreme Court granted themselves in Marbury v. Madison (1803). Additionally, the President has also taken on the authority to interpret the US Constitution since President Monroe through Signing Statements. Naturally, when Congress enacts legislation into law they are also assuming the authority to interpret the US Constitution. As a result, all branches of government are performing their own interpretations of the US Constitution, and they do not always agree with each other.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:11 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top