Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I'm personally tired of the petty partisanship that makes up the bulk of our discourse these days. I prefer actual discussions of policies, and facts that actually lead to meaningful conversations about how to resolve our problems. Because we have very real problems, and we desperately need a government able and willing to address those problems. But instead, people like to attack Mrs Clinton and Mrs Obama for their looks. Because that's going to lead to a productive discourse.....in nutso-whacko land. In the real world, it's time for people to grow up. Instead of acting like 12-year-old boys mucking it up in the bathroom over how the new science teacher's glasses look.
And what's worse is that the thread is about Mr Sizemore's attempt to SELL his Hollywood tell-all. A book that has little to recommend it, so he's trying to drum up interest with salacious details that are probably pure fantasy.
Dang ! I missed this " go to" angle.
I think I have snow between the ears, given the piles along side my driveway are now, as of today, taller than I am.
Sure...go after Bill about sex again. Last time the GOP did this Clinton's approval rating went up 17 points. The time before that, it got him elected President. The time before that, it got him elected governor of AR.
I realize I have a math degree and all, but even pre-school pattern recognition of the "this is a circle, this is a square" level should be able to recognize that when you go after Bill Clinton for pulling mad strange, you do him and anyone connected with him a big, huge favor.
Word to the wise - drop the attacks on Bill. Go after "what difference does it make" and various other Hillary specific things AND NOT HER PERSONAL LIFE. Clintons always win when you attack them personally because the media loves them some Democrat royalty, and they are the 1st Family of Democrat politics, having supplanted the Kennedys.
Isn't trying to give amnesty to 20 million illegals enough of a losing strategy for 2016? Why do Republicans need to find more ways to lose to pile on to that? Are they really worried that amnesty alone won't lose them the election? Maybe if they replace ObamaCare with the xerox copy called BoehnerCare, and just make it more unpopular by giving a tax break or dodge to some big GOP donor...maybe that will for sure, no doubt, stop even worrying about even a remote chance of winning lock up the election for Hillary.
Only way I can explain them trying to redeem the one knock on Clinton, which was him bumping uglies with a chunkster. Great, erase everyone's one bad memory by scrubbing it with images of naked Elizabeth Hurley in her prime? Why not just make him a rock star, President of the UN General Assembly, give him a Nobel prize and have the Pope bless him as a saint as well? Is it me, or does it seem like every time the GOP does anything you could swear they are being commended to by Hillary's campaign manager?
So let me get this right, your taking a tabloid report from Tom Sizemore who is a known drug addict and woman beater and we don't even know if it was him and if he was serious if it was and even if it did happen WTF does that have to do with the pirce of eggs in China? Its like saying JFK screwed Nancy Reagan, who the F cares. If its true, and that is a big if than the only thing it means is Hillary stuck with her husband as he wiped his feet all over her, so if anything it make Hillary more sympathetic. Palin was sleeping with black guys and I don't hear you guys talking trash about her. LMFAO. Hypocrites.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.