Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Two men cannot make a baby. Two Women cannot make a baby.
Thats true, but I'm adopted, my brothers adopted, my sisters adopted, my kids are adopted, my cousins are adopted, so what do you have against adoption and whats it have to do with the thread?
Well to claim you dont need someone of the opposite sex to have a baby, isnt really honest, but its completely unrelated to the thread anyways, since one doesnt ahve to be married to have a baby, or adopt fro that matter.
Well to claim you dont need someone of the opposite sex to have a baby, isnt really honest, but its completely unrelated to the thread anyways, since one doesnt ahve to be married to have a baby, or adopt fro that matter.
Yes, exactly. And obviously we're not naive about the logistics, but trust me, she is OUR baby, for all intents and purposes.
One lady in my birth group is older and had to use donor eggs. You want to go tell her it's not her baby?
So, all people incapable of reproducing should be banned from getting married. I can, and have, had children so I should be allowed to get married.
No, because at least a woman who cannot bear children and a man fit the definition of marriage and fit the definition of parents within the western family ideal
No, because at least a woman who cannot bear children and a man fit the definition of marriage and fit the definition of parents within the western family ideal
Well ideals change and definitions change. Those who don't adapt to change, get left behind.
In order to make a baby you need a sperm and an egg. A male and a female needs to be involved in order to create an egg and a sperm.We can all agree about that.
Now, how this sperm and egg meet up is not only by male and females having sex. It can be done in other ways.
So a baby can be created in more than one way. So a homosexual couple does not personally have to be involved sexually with the opposite sex in order to have a child - And that's the whole point we are all trying to get across.
Yes, exactly. And obviously we're not naive about the logistics, but trust me, she is OUR baby, for all intents and purposes.
One lady in my birth group is older and had to use donor eggs. You want to go tell her it's not her baby?
Clearly you havent read my postings because I for one, havent suggested they arent your babies.. Being adopted, (by a single female 25 years ago at that), and adopted two children now as a single father, I'd be a complete idiot to suggest that children arent yours if you havent given birth to them.
No, because at least a woman who cannot bear children and a man fit the definition of marriage and fit the definition of parents within the western family ideal
Western family ideal? So children can't be raised by single parents? There is no western family ideal. Children should be raised in healthy happy families.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
