Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-08-2014, 03:43 PM
 
13,303 posts, read 7,870,141 times
Reputation: 2144

Advertisements

Just curious as to whether there is less or more hype in the process.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-08-2014, 04:02 PM
 
9,659 posts, read 10,227,349 times
Reputation: 3225
It is the board of directors that decide the CEO, not the employees.

That said, the process for deciding presidential candidates would be more similar to how a CEO is elected. Yet the presidential elections would be as if the employees decided on a CEO out of candidates appointed by a board of directors.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-08-2014, 04:05 PM
 
4,512 posts, read 5,054,158 times
Reputation: 13403
The main difference is that a CEO has some idea of how to do the job, an elected official doesn't !
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-08-2014, 04:07 PM
 
9,659 posts, read 10,227,349 times
Reputation: 3225
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nodpete View Post
The main difference is that a CEO has some idea of how to do the job, an elected official doesn't !
An elected official does his job real well, getting re-elected every year.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-08-2014, 04:10 PM
 
13,303 posts, read 7,870,141 times
Reputation: 2144
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheHurricaneKid View Post
An elected official does his job real well, getting re-elected every year.
By the board whom the CEO bribes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-08-2014, 04:11 PM
 
Location: Stasis
15,823 posts, read 12,465,032 times
Reputation: 8599
CEOs are appointed to look after the economic interests of the shareholders not the not the workers. That is why they can get performance bonuses when laying off workers is best for the shareholders. Often there are competing candidates with different visions and solutions and the board must decide which direction to go. There can be much back room intrigue and the loser usually has to retire or leave (with a nice bonus). The 'hype" is from the media and shareholders watching but the process and decisions are all behind the closed doors of the board room.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-08-2014, 04:14 PM
 
8,016 posts, read 5,859,543 times
Reputation: 9682
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nodpete View Post
The main difference is that a CEO has some idea of how to do the job, an elected official doesn't !
So true!

And even more important, if a CEO increases their company's debt too much, sometimes the company doesn't survive. The elected official, however, never has to worry about the taxpayers surviving.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-08-2014, 04:14 PM
 
Location: Florida
23,795 posts, read 13,261,787 times
Reputation: 19952
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nodpete View Post
The main difference is that a CEO has some idea of how to do the job, an elected official doesn't !
Actually it is more like CEOs know how to convince the Board of Directors that he/she knows how to do the job. As almost anyone who has worked in large companies are aware, many CEOs have no idea how to run a company, but get paid 204 times what their employees make. Think Gerald Levin, Carly Fiorina, Bob Nardelli, Johnathan Schwarz, Dennis Kozlowski, etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-08-2014, 04:17 PM
 
Location: Florida
23,795 posts, read 13,261,787 times
Reputation: 19952
Quote:
Originally Posted by ntwrkguy1 View Post
So true!

And even more important, if a CEO increases their company's debt too much, sometimes the company doesn't survive. The elected official, however, never has to worry about the taxpayers surviving.
But they have to worry about being reelected. CEOs get to walk away with a golden parachute after they drive the company into the ditch. CEOs usually are not punished for ruining the company--they are rewarded.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-08-2014, 04:31 PM
 
9,659 posts, read 10,227,349 times
Reputation: 3225
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enigma777 View Post
But they have to worry about being reelected. CEOs get to walk away with a golden parachute after they drive the company into the ditch. CEOs usually are not punished for ruining the company--they are rewarded.
After their political career is over, politicians can go into a nice position with the companies they supported.

That said, not all CEOs are the head of a rich company.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top